Living with the HTC EVO 4G
0. phoneArena posted on 26 Jul 2010, 08:19
Let me start by saying this: I was happy with my Hero. It was rooted, I had been running Eclair for months and thanks to the many great chefs out there ...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. remixfa posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:47 0 0
Glad your enjoying it. I really thought for a hot minute about jumping to sprint to get the phone. I wouldnt bash blur so much though. People that actually use blur for more than a test or review generally really like it. Like anything it has its ups and downs. The whole motorola lockdown is a killer for me, though. I wont touch a phone that has been locked down to keep the mod community out. Not after owning a cliq and going through that hassle first hand. I have the Galaxy S/vibrant. Touchwiz 3 isnt anything to write home about. I Keep one widget up to demo to customers, but the rest i use market apps for. But for its speed and the utter beauty of the screen, nothing can compare. Even putting it up against regular AMOLED devices like the HD2 makes them look bland. Putting it up against a TFT screen like the evo makes it look like the difference between the newest LCD HDtvs and those old dial turning tvs. Not having a flash kinda sucks for a high end phone, but its lowlight shooting capabilities work quite nice, especially for wider shots where the flash just wont work.
19. herbiederb posted on 26 Jul 2010, 17:31 0 0
Both HD2 and EVO have TFT screens. I have both and theyre both good in the sunlight. HTC/EVO/HD2 FTW!
42. remixfa posted on 28 Jul 2010, 19:47 0 1
herbie, the HD2 has an AMOLED screen, not TFT. Thats one of the few actual differences between the evo and the HD2 besides OS.
46. steveymacjr (unregistered) posted on 06 Aug 2010, 17:13 0 0
Um, correction, the HD2 doesn't have an AMOLED screen... This link here:http://www.phonearena.com/html
s/HTC-HD2-US-phone-pa_4345.html shows the HD2 to have a TFT screen...
3. scottmbolt (unregistered) posted on 26 Jul 2010, 10:49 0 0
iFail = A smart phone for dumb people EVO = An ultra smart phone for smart people!
4. sprintguy09 posted on 26 Jul 2010, 11:08 0 0
After seeing the epic 4g preview on youtube it stole me away from the evo it just that much faster
5. Richcop posted on 26 Jul 2010, 11:15 0 0
Nice article. I feel the same way about the EVO. I would not change it for anything. I also have 3 spare batteries and usually get 9-20 hours out of a charge with pretty heavy use.
6. PapaJay224 posted on 26 Jul 2010, 11:16 0 0
I really hate Sprint, its against my competitive nature to like them, as well as listening to a Key Note from Dan Hesse is like nails on a chalk board. BUT with that being said, I am happy to see people are enjoying Android phones more and more and getting away from the, need I mention "look at me phone". (the phone in which we do not speak). Im happy Sprint, Verizon, T-Mo, and yes even At&t are supplying the world with these device's. A serious Hats off to Google, a once known search engine and now cell phone connoisseur.
9. DonLouie posted on 26 Jul 2010, 12:42 0 0
I don't see why any type of hate for Sprint is needed just to be competitive but to each their own.
16. remixfa posted on 26 Jul 2010, 16:30 0 0
more than likely it means he works at a competitor like VZW or Tmo. My guess. Besides, competition drives deep feelings. :)
7. SellPhones82 posted on 26 Jul 2010, 11:47 0 0
A few questions for the editor that may help me decide between the Evo and Epic, were you able to notice the 30 FPS cap on the Evo? Also have you had a chance to use any of the Galaxy S line to compare the experience with the Evo?
8. sprintguy09 posted on 26 Jul 2010, 12:19 0 0
Have you seen any of the youtube vids of the epic yet if not check them out it will make your mind up for you
10. SellPhones82 posted on 26 Jul 2010, 12:43 0 0
Yeah...those vids are why I'm leaning towords the Epic and have not bought an Evo yet. Though I've seen a lot of comments regarding lag on the Galaxy S which most say is due to TouchWiz 3.0. So as long as I can load a vanilla Eclair or Froyo ROM is should be set.
11. sprintguy09 posted on 26 Jul 2010, 14:15 0 0
Yea I hurd about the lag also but from the vids it looks like on the sprint version they have fixed that but I like the sense Ui on the htc so im kinda iffy about the samsung touchwiz
17. remixfa posted on 26 Jul 2010, 16:36 0 0
fiddling with sense and touchwiz.. sence is nicer. Touchwiz on the galaxy series is made colorful to accentuate that beautiful screen. Otherwise, its not that great. Im waiting for Cyanogen or someone else to come out with a great mod for it. All lag is produced by the shoddy touchwiz overlays. I have a galaxy S. There is no phone as powerful. Every bench shows the Galaxy series obliterates the competition in pretty much everything. screen, horsepower, polygon pushing, battery power, touch accuracy... its not a competition. Put em side by side and it makes an EVO screen look soo old and bland its not funny. Of course, it does that next to any cell phone, not just the evo.. lol.
33. de 2 philly posted on 27 Jul 2010, 12:43 0 0
Unfortunately the Galaxy S series dont have as nice of cameras, 4G or kickstand... horsepower may be more, but doesnt have as many options... well until the EPIC comes out.
43. remixfa posted on 28 Jul 2010, 19:59 0 0
sprints 4g is a max of 12mb/s with a realsitic around 7s... in a very limited area. The Tmobile's max is around 21mb/s hspa+ with a real world average of about 14. The Vibrant may not get higher than 7.2 because it lakes HSPA+ capabilities, but my real world is about 4-5mb/s. The tmobile HSPA footprint is much larger and spreading faster than Sprints Wimax. Soo.. for the 85% of sprints network doesnt have 4g, it runs on a theoretical max of 3mb/s and a real world of about 2mb/s. So in most areas, my Vibrant is faster :).. so much for 4g superiority. as for the kickstand??? Really? thats a deal breaker? U cant just.. i dunno.. hold it sideways or lean it against something? The camera takes full HD 720p 30fps video, which is better than the EVOs 23fps. While it may lack a flash, it has a great lowlight mode that more than makes up for it in most situations. In fact, i just did a real world test last night comparing to my friends Incredible. When it came to up close shots, the flash won in lowlight.. hands down. When it came to getting shots of larger areas, the flash was useless and actually hurt the picture quality, where the Vibrant's lowlight mode made the picture look great. And what options are missing exactly from the GalaxyS that the Evo has? They both play TV, run the same apps, run the same OS.. The galaxy has: the better screen, more horsepower, a dedicated GPU, no FPS cap like the Evo has, and more. The evo is a great phone, but it was not the best phone for very long. That is the way of electronics. Next month somethin will come out that makes the Galaxy look old. And so on and so forth.
12. etownone posted on 26 Jul 2010, 15:02 0 0
As a verizon customer, I'm really really jealous of the EVO. Especially now that the Droid X come out, and just as the stated, it's a monster. Being that both are 4.3 displays, why couldn't the Droid X be the same size as the EVO?? I held the EVO, it's just feels and looks like the perfect size for an Android Smartphone. Oh well.. Here's to looking forward to the Samsung Fascinate.
38. herbiederb posted on 27 Jul 2010, 13:49 0 0
Moto cant seem to get their engineers to lose the chins and humps... or maybe they think theyre innovating. Carrying that thing is one step away from carrying around an iPad.
