x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




LightSquared and Sprint reach 15 year deal to provide LTE service to the carrier

0. phoneArena 18 Jun 2011, 00:25 posted on

Bloomberg has obtained a letter revealing that LightSquared and Sprint have agreed to a 15 year deal under which the latter will receive LTE 4G service from LightSquared; the value of the deal is estimated to be $20 billion...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 00:41 9

1. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Bingo!! No more talk about WiMAX, Sprint is going LTE. I bet their LTE since it's coming after Verizon & AT&T will be EVEN more kickass. I am so proud of Sprint. I am telling you Sprint is making all the right moves. Sorry all you Sprint hates, Sprint has LTE! LMAO! This is indeed a good day in the world of Sprint! YES!!!

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 09:15 2

14. snowgator (Posts: 3210; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Dude- I think you cracked my computer screen! ;-D

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 10:10

17. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


I don't know how proud you should be. I definitely think this is a smart decision, but I'm having a problem with Sprint going with certain technology and not sticking with it. What happens to all those folks who bought into Sprint saying WiMAX was the future? Guess they have to keep those phones until another upgrade comes around. And think of all the money wasted on WiMAX...they effectively have to start over. Remember those CDMA phones that were supposed replace Nextel. Those were also quickly gotten rid of, but people still purchased those phones. Definitely a smart move, but I hope Sprint doesn't jump the gun on projects like this...

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 11:55 1

20. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


I think you are making this out to be more difficult that it has to be. #1 This deal that Sprint is in would save the company almost a quarter of a billion dollars. That is some huge change. When AT&T & Verizon planed their LTE networks they had to pay out of pocket. Sprint is going to be saving 240 million dollars. So that should offset some of the money wasted on WiMAX as you say. That is a clear advantage for Sprint. #2 All the people with WiMAX will be fine, just like the people with HSPA+ phones on AT&T when their LTE network goes up. For Sprint it's a simple transition. They will install LTE towers first at the sites where WiMAX is prevalent. When the last WiMAX phone is sold & the 2 year contract is done then you shut down the WiMAX signal. They can give special deals to people with WiMAX phones so they get on LTE. So for a couple of years there will be WiMAX signal & LTE signal at the same time. Just like with AT&T with its HSPA+ & LTE. So it's not that hard. So there goes your starting over comment. Sprint had to do it. I think the way that they are doing it is not only SMART but EFFICIENT. Sprint is on a roll right now. They are making all the right moves! Keep it going Sprint, I like where you are going. I posted this from my phone at the beach with my family as I eat a burger! HTC Evo 4G your days are numbered. HTC Evo 3D here I come. Friday the 24th is STILL too far away! lol

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 13:45 2

28. Whateverman (Posts: 3205; Member since: 17 May 2009)


Sprint was being neither smart nor efficient when they went against the world standard with it's selection of wimax. I may be wrong, but I think iden is still up and running also with no current news on a shutdown. That means Sprint will be struggling to keep four different networks running at once. LTE, WiMax, iDen and CDMA! That is not efficient at all. As for the current WiMax customers, I think you are right for the most part, Sprint will probably offer a little something off of a new LTE device. But they're not going to offer their latest and greatest for free. They will receive an offer for a free low end phone and maybe an additional $50 bucks or so off the higher end models. Because their phones will still work on 3G, so there is no real need to upgrade those with wimax devices.

Sprint didn't plan this out at all, they are moving to LTE because they realize wimax was a huge mistake, that's it! I'm not sure why Verizon and ATT "paying out of pocket" is a bad thing. They will own their network and that is a good thing. There won't be a partner to split profits with or to hike up the price at the end of the contract. That 240 they will save is nothing when you compare it to the 5 Billion that Verizon invests in their network every year. Don't get me wrong, I think this is a great move by Sprint. I'm just saying that LTE should have been their first move.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 15:16

29. ojdidit84 (unregistered)


I'm pretty sure the only reason they're forced to go with LTE is because Clearwire dropped the ball with WiMax. There were other major companies that were on board with Clearwire and WiMax until Clearwire essentially dropped the ball on rolling out WiMax and taking forever to develop it.

Here it is going into Q3 2011 and Verizon's LTE, which rolled out a year later than Clearwire began rolling out WiMax, and their network far exceeds the 4G coverage of Sprint and Clearwire. Meanwhile, Sprint has to wait for Clearwire to roll out WiMax in areas where Sprint may want to have coverage but can't because... well...

On paper way back when WiMax and LTE were first being talked about, WiMax seemed like a great idea but ultimately the rollout of the service rested mostly on Clearwire's shoulders who have trouble even rolling out the service in major cities (Phoenix or San Diego, CA, a city of 2m+ people for ex.) on their own while small 100k population cities like Bakersfield, CA have coverage. (Really?)

Maybe Sprint SHOULD take some time on this new 15yr deal to begin building up their own network for the next greatest technology (and get rid of iDen and use that Spectrum for voice & data already) so they won't have to rely on other companies that later fail and cause them to fail in the long run.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 16:55 1

34. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


@whateverman
Dan Hesse said the WiMax boxes could be switched to LTE easily with mostly software udpates. This means that Sprint was prepared for the eventuallity enough to think ahead about converting, AND the infrastructure they built with WiMax is not only NOT WASTED, it cost less than LTE infrastructure.
Hmm, save money? Check.
Get the first 4G network established to attract customers when you need it most? Check.
Plan ahead in case you need to switch to LTE? Check.
Make a deal with a network that not only can provide LTE, but also Sat connectivity so that you could conceivably offer phones with 4G and Sat radios that no other network on earth can provide so thier subscribers will never be out of range again? CHECK!

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 18:02 1

38. Whateverman (Posts: 3205; Member since: 17 May 2009)


you didn't expect Dan hesse to actually come out and say, "Yeah, we know wimax is a huge gamble and will be really expensive to convert if we're wrong"! Of course he's gonna say its not expensive to convert! Even if building wimax was cheaper, by adding the LTE network now adds additional cost. Even if they convert the current base stations over, they have to now double everything else within those stations in order to sustain both networks. This isn't a simple software download like ATT and T Mobile did for HSPA+. And if they don't keep wimax, converting cutovers old devices over will cost them an arm and a leg, and Sprint will recoup that loss any way possible. So you can go ahead and "uncheck" that save money category.

And are Sprint customers really looking for Sat phones? I don't think so.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 23:58 2

40. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


I don't think Sprint customers are looking at sat phones either.

but as for the added cost of now building out LTE on top of Wimax, that is what this article is about: they aer saving .75B by partnering with LightSquared.

Here is specific mention of "Network Visions" which talks about the cost savings and efficiency gained by running all three spectrums for iDen, CDMA and WiMax out of teh same base stations:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprint-announces-Ne twork-Vision---a-5-billion-project-to-overhaul-its -network_id15115

Here is mention of specific upgrade requirements to change Sprint WiMax equipment to LTE: a baseband card and a software upgrade. Easy and cheap!
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprint-looking-into -an-LTE-future_id16895

Yes, Dan said they will honor contracts for WiMax devices, they wouldn't cut them loose; and you're right, he had to regardless of intent just to protect Sprint's image.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 09:08 1

44. biglebronski (Posts: 22; Member since: 18 Mar 2011)


@Whateverman

Sprint may not have been perfectly efficient in doing this, but "efficient" and "smart" are two very different things here. Sprint gained many subscribers by becoming the "first" 4g network in the US.

Some people may feel duped by this stunt, but its simple: people that bought WiMax devices got what they wanted-- which was 4g before anyone else got it. A switch to LTE does not mean that those devices will become nonfunctional immediately, and those who jumped in line to buy a new WiMax device will be the same people who are first in line to buy a new LTE device anyway. No money wasted, no time wasted, get over it.

As far as inefficient, not so much either: Sprint's current WiMax towers need only a small adjustment to broadcast an LTE network. It is not necessary to build new towers in locations where WiMax Towers already exist, meaning Sprint WiMax cities can be Sprint LTE cities in an instant. No starting over. No waiting. Sprint could theoretically have its first LTE device up and running by the end of 2011.

Good job, Sprint. No harm, no foul in going with the best technology, no matter when you decide to do it.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 09:57 1

46. Slammer (Posts: 1034; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


Sprint had an FCC timeline that was due to expire in making use of their spectrum holdings. WiMAX was ready. LTE was not. Sprint had no choice but to move forward with their timeline. It had nothing to do with a poor decision.

It is also important to point out, that with 237 WiMAX markets around the globe already operational at the time, it was in hopes that WiMAX would gain world standard.

IDEN is scheduled to be shut down by 2013. 2014 at the latest. Then they will make use of that 800MHz spectrum for CDMA.

Currently, Sprint is in a very good position to switch from WiMAX to LTE. When their 4G infrastructure was being built, they took into consideration the possible switch to LTE. Their base stations have been fitted with the necessary LTE hardware to make a seemless transition. Software upgrades will allow almost overnight switching. The current handsets are the only drawback for quick transitions. However, Sprint has plans and is in talks for temporary handsets containing both WiMAX and LTE radio chipsets to help in the transition.

John B.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 09:11 1

45. biglebronski (Posts: 22; Member since: 18 Mar 2011)


@SuperAndroid Evo

You are pretty much right. The only thing is, Sprint doesn't need to replace its WiMax towers with LTE towers, the technologies are very similar, and WiMax towers only need a small adjustment to run LTE.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 16:43 2

32. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


By the time Sprint is ready to phase out WiMax in 2-4 years, everyone using it will want a new phone anyway...

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 10:42 1

47. Slammer (Posts: 1034; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


Jeff,

You browse these forms enough to know that Sprint didn't have a choice for WiMAX. The FCC's timeline for Sprint to utilize their spectrum holdings, was running out. They needed to move forward and WiMAX was ready. LTE was not yet a culmination amoung carriers.

They also don't have to start over. Sprint considered that LTE may become the standard when they were building their infrastructure. So they added the necessary LTE hardware and equipment during the process. Very cool and very smart.

I agree that trying to integrate Direct Connect and CDMA was a misfire, but I think the ATT and Verizon ads for PTT gave Sprint an excuse to keep some sort of relevance to a one handset does both. CDMA voice and Walkie Talkie. Once the hype died, so did the initiative.

To be honest here, I also am very proud of the direction Sprint is heading. Sprint's CEO has done a remarkable job taking a sinking ship and revitalizing its significance in the wireless industry.

One of the secrets to success in a work place, is being able to adapt to change in the workplace and marketable environment. I bring this up, because many people still have a perceived notion that Sprint is a horrible carrier. However, when looking at recent stats from the last year and a half, Sprint has graduated with some very respectable accomplishments. People need to realize this in order to view Sprint as it currently stands; not for what it used to be.

With people ignoring these milestones, they possibly lose out on what could be the best carrier they have ever dealt with.

John B.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 23:01

50. Whateverman (Posts: 3205; Member since: 17 May 2009)


@ Slammer. I'm not what timeline you are referring to but I've tried to find some info and came up empty. If you have a link I really would like to read up on it. But most articles I have read referred to the move to WiMax as a gamble that didn't pay off. He also admits that the reason for the jump to wimax was so that Sprint could be the first company to offer 4G, no mention of a timeline.

@ Biglebronski. I think all the tech savvy guys like your, Slammer and even myself, all had high hopes for Sprint and WiMax. But the average consumer has no idea what the terms WiMax or 4G mean. They were attracted to the $69.99 all you can eat data and texting. So they didn't need 4G right away. All the had to do was keep putting out those commercials on how Sprint has changed and how much cheaper it was than ATT and VZW, they would have still gotten all those customers.

Also, cheaper is only cheaper if you don't have to go back to the first option. No matter how much cheaper WiMax was originally, the extra hardware and software needed to change those base stations now will bring that cost up. And think about this, if Wimax is working out so well, why even consider running LTE with it or converting everything over at all? My guess is Clearwire's financial problems scared the crap out of them. Here Sprint's entire 4G network is run by this whole other company that was sinking like a stone. What other chose does Sprint have?

@ Corps1089. Yes, partnering with Lightsquared will provide an initial savings of .24B, not .75B. But wouldn't that put them in a similar situation they find themselves in with Clearwire's. Now they have two companies taking a slice of the pie! Hopefully history will not repeat itself, because Sprint may have to raise prices again to pay LightSquared. Notice how the $10 4G fee, became a $10 smartphone fee after Clearwire started having issues and demanded more money from Sprint. This could happen with LightSquared as well, and then what is Sprint to do?

Do get me wrong guys, i'm not hating on Sprint. I used to think they were just horrible company that deserved to go belly up! But i think Dan Hesse really is making a difference, but I think LTE was the obvious chose from the start and in the end, the money they saved in the beginning will be lost. But at least they're moving forward.

posted on 20 Jun 2011, 08:56

51. Slammer (Posts: 1034; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


Hi whateverman,

I have one of links here for you. It is very extensive. But line item 165 points out a time frame for use of the 2.5ghz spectrum in which Sprint puchased. They made the purchase around 2004. With a 6 year term to make use of the spectrum, it gave Sprint a time limit of no later than 2010 to meet obligations of reaching a percentage of American end users with some sort of service with their 2.5Ghz spectrum.

LTE was not yet available for consumption in 2008 and 2009. WiMAX was already present in more than a couple hundred markets around the world.

WiMAX was a gamble ever since LTE was in talks. Two different groups control these platforms. The 3PPG has been the main entity for wireless directives including GSM. With this kind of leverage, it was going to be difficult for WiMAX to meet what was planned for the future. Time to market was a bet that needed to be taken to hopefully overshadow the LTE initiative. The business models of both are different. So you can see where these types of fights always ensue for marketshare.

So in some ways, Sprint did take a gamble, but it was a necessary gamble that really left them with little choice.

John B.

posted on 20 Jun 2011, 21:09

55. wateryspit (Posts: 13; Member since: 25 Jan 2011)


well in that case everyone should be upset about buying android or iphones with verizon and there tiered plans

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 10:41 3

18. spanky (Posts: 81; Member since: 02 Jun 2011)


woooo im pumped too! still buying a evo 3d on the 24th. hopefully something will be done to get an LTE enabled device when Sprint gets it ;)

posted on 20 Jun 2011, 17:32

54. PapaJay224 (Posts: 866; Member since: 08 Feb 2009)


WOW SuperAndroid nerd, go easy there, you might break a vessel.

So, now please explain how dumping s**t loads of money into WiMax and being the first 4G and being obsolete in 12 months THEN jumping on the LTE bandwagon is making all the right decisions, can you explain that?

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 00:46 2

2. biophone (Posts: 1893; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


Superandrioid are you ok do you need a moment for yourself lol

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:01 1

3. coria791 (Posts: 21; Member since: 12 Jun 2010)


LOL funny but no he has a point im soo glad im with Sprint

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:11 2

4. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Can't I be happy! lol Just so you know, I am trying to be as over the top as I can. With all kidding aside this is wonderful news is it not? Sprint fans & customers SHOULD be very very happy! I know I am being silly; I am trying to have fun with it! Hey but thanks for asking! lol Tonight I am going to dream a LTE dream! lol

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 06:24 1

12. The_Miz (Posts: 1496; Member since: 06 Apr 2011)


dude had a complete orgasm over the announcement

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 11:59

21. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


The_Miz you look like you like to wear women’s underwear. Hey if it works for you I am very happy for you! lol I really hope you are "The_Miz" because to be rocking some else’s picture is pretty sad! LMAO!

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 17:45

37. AnnDroid (unregistered)


It's okay with me! He's cute!

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:25 1

5. biophone (Posts: 1893; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


To coria
Never said he didn't
To superandrioidevo
No you can not be happy it's scaring everyone else away

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 12:10

24. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


biophone, I was just trying to have a laugh with it. Sorry if you didn't think it was funny. I didn't mean to scare you. BOO! lol

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:25

6. cheeseycheeser (Posts: 385; Member since: 24 Mar 2011)


@superandroidevo I quite like Sprint, but I don't like LightSquared. I think it's ridiculous that they're selling something that will inter fear with gps signals! And Sprints WiMax is already too high of a frequency to work well. Is it really a good idea to go even higher? That said LTE is amazing! Just got 28mbps down on my TBolt after they finally got LTE to Oregon today :D

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 12:06

23. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


The FCC is on LightSqared's back to fix this problem. Don't worry I will get done. Sprint will address the frequency also. Sprint's LTE will work correctly, so I feel very confident.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 12:13

26. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Sh*t sorry it will get done. I am at the beach & it's a little hard to see the screen in this sun! lol

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 16:48 1

33. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


@cheeseycheeser
lightsquared said they already have a solution that is supposed to be revealed in the July report.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:29

7. biophone (Posts: 1893; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


Cheesy dont upset him he's having his moment. Your just a sprite hater although I prefer 7 up as well don't tell superandriod

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 12:11

25. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4090; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


lol Good one!

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:33

8. clevername (Posts: 1428; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)


So if tmo gets bought bought by att, and all 3 have lte, not to mention regional and small carriers like metropcs, I really hope someawrsome roaming agreements between the three come out. If so this county could actually have 100% lte coverage, not with one carrier, and maybe not including Alaska, but we may have the luxury of going almost anywhere else in the us and never drop service.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:40 2

9. Wowe1234 (unregistered)


2012-2017 Sprint has the pay out an average or 2 billion a year in debt. I'm sure sprint doesn't want to do this but they need the money. I personally feel that its only uphill for sprint. With the reallocation of the SMR freq coming and extra funds; they will probably be able to muster enough money to join in the next 120 mhz broadband auction. They will also save about 5 billion in the following years after project Leapfrog is finished(less towers needed, better pipeline, freq being used better). Overall, I like sprint as an investment and I have put my money where my mouth is....

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:44 2

10. Wowe1234 (unregistered)


It sound like Sprint will have almost 100% voice coverage in the next few years with the satellite coverage the rural areas with its low bean signal. There will just be a problem transitioning between towers and satellite connection.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 17:05 1

35. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


If they keep thier voice over CDMA which allows connections to multiple access it is concevable that they could intersperse packets from satelites with packets from cell towers, just from another source. Unlike TDMA and FDMA which would be more problematic. TDMA would be messed up when interspersing data from satellite due to the time delay. FDMA would be problematic since inherently it uses a specific frequencey range.
Either way it would most likley need to have both radios integrated on one chip [and who is going to bother producing that when there would be so few buyers?

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 01:48

11. Wowe1234 (unregistered)


Lightsqaured should use it lower L 1525-1545 for the LTE towers which is far enought away from GPS and upper L 1546-1559 for satellite which won't interfere with GPS if its a low beam from a satellite.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 09:14 1

13. snowgator (Posts: 3210; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


We are getting into an area where I know little to nothing. As a huge Sprint supporter who is in a rural area with Sprint 3G, I cannot give them my money due to their indoor reception being very weak. Will this help?

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 09:32 1

15. Allday28 (Posts: 274; Member since: 19 Nov 2010)


So I bet that means there wimax phones wont be able to pick up the LTE. What a waste!

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 09:37

16. MpowerSkills (Posts: 36; Member since: 19 Feb 2011)


Here's a dumb question. LTE seems to be what many companies are switching to, does that mean any LTE enabled phone will work on any LTE network as long as a SIM card or something is changed?

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 10:57

19. Wowe1234 (unregistered)


No. Not only will most LTE only work for the frequencies that the host company offers but so far LTE radios in phones are only being designed to work in the band class for the host(Verizon, At&t). Example: Verizon class 13.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 12:05 1

22. Nunya (unregistered)


Can't u ppl read, it also says that Sprint is working on a similar deal with CLEARWIRE to extend their Wimax coverage. DUH :P

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 22:39 1

39. bigb (unregistered)


Clearwire is rumored to be switching to LTE. If they have a deal with both providers and the phones can connect with towers from both Clearwire and LightSquared, Sprint could have a pretty large area of LTE coverage I would imagine. Im just speculating though

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 13:32 1

27. luis_lopez_351 (Posts: 951; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


Oooo! Better think twice before buying the wimax enabled HTC EVO 3D or the Upcoming Moto Photon 4G. Before you know it it will be dropped like IDEN devices.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 15:56 1

30. von (unregistered)


correct me if I'm wrong but i thought it was possible for sprint to use dual-radios thus making phones capable of running both wimax and lte

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 16:15 2

31. luis_lopez_351 (Posts: 951; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


it would be expensive to manufacture and to run 2 separate networks.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 00:18 1

41. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


incorrect, there would be some cost, but not much:
1) add LTE to network:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprint-looking-into -an-LTE-future_id16895
2) already consolidating existing spectrum equipment:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprint-announces-Ne twork-Vision---a-5-billion-project-to-overhaul-its -network_id15115
3)Clearwire and LightSquared will be partnering in sharing the costs.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 17:10

48. luis_lopez_351 (Posts: 951; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


But what would be the point of running two different Technologies? LTE can easily cover wimax footprint and do more, and sprint would be saving money. Plus LTE is faster.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 18:47

49. p0rkguy (Posts: 684; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)


1 would probably be because they're still under contract.
2 is the fact that WiMAX has a broader coverage, so if Sprint decided to run LTE and WiMAX on the same towers, LTE will not cover as much as WiMAX but will be able to penetrate buildings.
3 LTE is not "faster", you're only believing it's faster because of what Verizon's LTE has to offer compared to Sprint's WiMAX.

posted on 20 Jun 2011, 09:37 1

53. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


And WiMax is still prevalent in other markets, so worl phones and economies of scale come into play when making phones for different markets.

posted on 18 Jun 2011, 17:43

36. AnnDroid (unregistered)


I'll give up the speed increase with LTE if it interferes with GPS. That said, I live in an area that I doubt I'll ever see 4G speeds, we just got 3G.

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 00:20

42. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)


Sorry to hear that! I am thinking of dropping my landline ISP when I get 4G...

posted on 19 Jun 2011, 08:24

43. JustAthought (unregistered)


I decided to join up with Sprint. My Verizon bill is out of control, and I think I am just over the stress of VZW. I will probably miss the Veizon service, but honestly with tiered data coming in soon and a lack of phones I want on Verizon. I think Sprint is worth a shot. Hopefully in my travels I won't regret the choice.

posted on 20 Jun 2011, 08:59

52. Slammer (Posts: 1034; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


@Whateverman

http://www.google.com/m/url?client=ms-android-spri nt-us&ei=vEz_TdivLI2XlQfUxKblAg&gl=us&hl=en&q=http ://www.clarendon.tv/comments/fcc-7.pdf&source=andr oid-launcher-search&ved=0CBYQFjAAOAo&usg=AFQjCNGLv 6_u35H2ZicEJP9fIlc_2Pz4yw


John B.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories