Lenovo exec says Windows RT doesn't need to exist
0. phoneArena 05 Sep 2013, 21:08 posted on
There has been a fair bit of criticism for Windows RT since its release. The tech community never liked the limitations, consumers didn't see the value, and there's a possibility that the platform's failure was a key part of Steve Ballmer being pushed out as Microsoft's CEO. Now, a Lenovo exec is saying that there is no reason for Windows RT to exist at all...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. -box- (Posts: 3565; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
I don't disagree. Make Windows 8 cheaper and blend WP8 and Win8 into 9. By the time 9's out we'll probably have desktop-grade Intel Atoms and AMD APUs in phones.
2. fanboy1974 (Posts: 997; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)
I agree; back when Microsoft first announced it.
4. gazmatic (Posts: 502; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)
Windows Rt had a purpose... Get windows on arm
Intel is dragging it's feet while less and less people bought desktops and choose tablets instead
full windows is too power hungry for arm... And the only chips that give battery life are slow like atom and tegra 3
rt only makes sense on snap dragon 800, tegra 4/5 and clover trail
it's all good when all you do is play candy crush and update Facebook but when you want actual work done you want a speedy device
say what you want about rt but it has more features and productivity than both ios and Android
MS failed both to market it and price it accordingly
they actually had a higher profit margin than the iPad... THAT'S RIDICULOUS
they needed to undercut the market even if it meant selling it at a loss for the first six months
6. TheCynicalTechie (Posts: 54; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
Surface RT is useless, they should call it Surface Lite and put a Bay Trail processor in it.
5. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 1433; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)
Rt just needs more apps,, people love apps. LoL...as mention, rt should be price aggresively..
7. jedpatrickdatu (Posts: 145; Member since: 24 Jan 2013)
Agreed about the price. After all, RT was made so tablets could be cheaper by running on ARM CPUs. So far though, RT tablets are very expensive.
8. FadyNabil (Posts: 36; Member since: 10 May 2013)
Agree, but where the haswell now? still nothing serious about it, no products.
till haswell is there, rt is there.
9. 7thspaceman (Posts: 899; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
if Microsoft does not have some form of an operating system to operate ARMS CPU controlled tablets then folks Apple Ipads and Android tablets will dominate the mobile tablet world because ARMS CPU tablet cost less to make and have better battery life than Intel/AMD x86 CPU architecture Systems. a good Intel Haswell i5 CPU tablet running Windows 8.1 is going to cost a person hundreds of dollars more to buy than an Arms CPU controlled tablet folks is you want a tablet to run Windows 98, XP, Vista , Windows 7 and windows 8 programs well- you will pay more for the Electronic components that make you tablets do that. I dare to say you wont be able to buy any good windows 8.1 tablet for under 300 dollars unless it's a 7 incher. the question is how much good will a small 7 inch tablet do if you try to make a word document on it.make sure you buy 300 power reading glasses !!!
10. renz4 (Posts: 150; Member since: 10 Aug 2013)
Lenovo might think it is not necessary but for chipmaker that licence ARM tech and ARM themselves it gives them the chance to move to much bigger form factor such as dekstop. ARM processor might be too weak right now to have full fledged windows in it but as the tech move forward and become much more faster more feature and function can be added later. for now Win RT will create the base needed for ARM architecture before the tech can advance further. i read somewhere long ago that nvidia JHH talking about ARM processor will be in our dekstop and laptop in the future and not only in limited to tablet and smart phones like now. i think that's the reason why nvidia really hoping for win RT to take flight.