Leaked photo from the HTC One's camera hits Flickr

4. HDShatter posted on 09 Feb 2013, 15:48 14 4

It still takes pictures that are good enough quality for anyone that doesn't thrive for maximum quality... Very few people buy a phone because the camera, if you want a good camera you get a camera not a phone.

8. Johnnokia posted on 09 Feb 2013, 16:38 6 9

I'm always in need for a great camera and I can't hold my camera wherever I go . So , the best thing is to have a great phone camera that enables you to have magnificent pictures the time you like.

11. Commentator posted on 09 Feb 2013, 17:45 21 2

I'm sorry, but it's really hard to take someone named "johnnokia" seriously when they're talking about Nokia vs. any competitor.

• This comment is posted in response to #8 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #8 Hide

20. dexter_jdr posted on 10 Feb 2013, 04:23 0 2

even the so called "galaxy camera" produces lesser good quality photos than the galaxy s3. and the s3 is a phone that out performs the real camera.

so whats your point?

• This comment is posted in response to #11 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #11 Hide

26. jackhammeR posted on 12 Feb 2013, 05:50 0 0

another blockhead with an old argument.."but a stand alone camcoder"...give me a brake.

5. LAFN posted on 09 Feb 2013, 15:55 8 2

Advanced camera

6. tyger11 posted on 09 Feb 2013, 16:06 6 1

Time difference between Asia and the west (Flickr) can easily account for that.

10. simplyj posted on 09 Feb 2013, 16:49 6 1

The camera is so good, it takes the pictures you want before you know you want them.

12. simplyj posted on 09 Feb 2013, 18:41 3 1

How many pictures do you need that are over 1520 x 2688? The only reason people who need high resolution pictures are prophotographers and they wont be using a cell phone to take pictures..

16. Deaconclgi posted on 09 Feb 2013, 21:19 2 6

Speak for yourself.

I use all 12 million pixels on my N8 and when I get a Red 808, I'll be using all 38 million pixels with it. I can't wait to take a pic and zoom in on detail that I could not see with my own eyes.

And yes, I am a mobile photographer and I have used my phones for years, starting with the Nokia N82 and it's superb 5MP Carl Zeiss and Xenon combo. Don't think that just because you hear "cellphone" that the pictures aren't going to be good. You must have never used any of Nokia's imaging flagships.

18. simplyj posted on 09 Feb 2013, 22:43 4 0

I had an N8, it was good. Just because you have more pixels, it does not mean you will have a better quality picture.

You also forgot that on the 808, the pictures are downsampled to create a 5 megapixel picture.

• This comment is posted in response to #16 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #16 Hide

27. jackhammeR posted on 12 Feb 2013, 05:52 0 0

more megapixel doesn't mean it will be better....but the 808 is an exception

• This comment is posted in response to #18 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #18 Hide

21. bayusuputra posted on 10 Feb 2013, 08:29 1 0

soooooo, you take pictures using full 38MP just to be able to zoom in and see whether in one window of a building you can see a nekkid grandma and other details you can't see with your eyes?

Jeezz, yeah, that's photography..

I must have been living under the rock to still use my film rangefinder and focus more on composition than details my eyes can't see..

You, sir, open up my eyes to things I didn't see before about photography..

• This comment is posted in response to #16 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #16 Hide

25. Feanor posted on 10 Feb 2013, 15:02 0 0

I think 4.3 Mpx is less than I even need to enjoy my pics on my TV... And apart from that... this is a huge marketing handicap. Anyway, let's see how the announcement of this technology will be because I cannot believe that HTC will come and say; "We take pride to our new flagship camera of 4.3Mpx". The will probably market it differently.

19. Synack posted on 10 Feb 2013, 03:04 4 1

Looks like someone hit up the good ole Google Translate and copy pasted everything from whatever language you came from.

22. bayusuputra posted on 10 Feb 2013, 08:55 1 1

but but but.. camera specs are not what make a good photograph..

Oh, wait, yeah.. you are just some Nokia fanboy who cares more about specs than actually taking good photographs.. I, too, am dying of laughter at Nokia, because for $600, the 808 Symbian is now resting in peace. And its 1/1.2" sensor size is very tiny compared to my Full-frame 35mm film "sensor" in my $100 Canon QL17 GIII with f/1.7 and ground glass which put those Carl-Zeiss lenses in the 808 to shame.. And it looks better, too..
41MP? I got 80MP scanned slides before..

HTC doesn't even care whether you still respect them or not.. They don't bother about 4-year-old kid who just learned how to copy paste from Google translate..

23. Guarulhos posted on 10 Feb 2013, 10:21 1 0

Ha Ha Ha Ha Apparently You Discovered Mars !

Truly Spectacular !

You're The Only One On The Planet To Discover That a Full Frame Camera is Better Than a Cameraphone ! Ha Ha Ha !

What a Ridiculous Comment !

The Truth is One !

Nokia 808 PureView PRO Average 5 Times Weighs In Less Than A Full Frame, On Average Is 5 Times Thinner Than a Full Frame, Perform And Receive Phone Calls, Navigate the Internet, Has Integrated GPS Navigation And Location With Real Time And Mainly Is With You At Any Time And Place !

Nokia 808 PureView PRO Any Humble Smartphone HTC, SONY, SAMSUNG, APPLE, MOTOROLA, LG When The Subject Is Quality Of Image And Video... And Up 4-Year-Old Kid Know !

29. jackhammeR posted on 12 Feb 2013, 05:58 0 0

seriously dude?
a stand alone camera better than a smartphone?
wow...you've just discovered a new world mister. Go educate yourself about Nokia's technology and n82, n8 and 808 capabilities because so far your arguments are a pile of crap.