x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Leak reaffirms new Samsung tablets to provide 2560x1600 resolution, also Exynos 5 and Snapdragon 800 CPUs

0. phoneArena 27 Jul 2013, 21:06 posted on

A couple new tablets will join the vast Samsung line-up with new silicon and high-resolution displays...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 21:08 7

1. papss (unregistered)


This is pretty exciting news actually. That means that mass produced SS phones with this hardware is around the corner..

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 23:34 6

17. abdane (Posts: 494; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)


won't be better than the monstrous Ativ Q !

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 21:36 16

2. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


If the P-600 is the new Nexus 10, I'd rather have a Exynos Octa 5420 over the S800. Exynos is clearly faster in terms of CPU and GPU.

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 21:51 4

3. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


That's right half baked A9, A15 Snapdragon vs Pure full A15 Exynos 5420 will demolish destroy it even clocked at 2.0Ghz let alone what would happen if clocked at 2.3Ghz.

Wait till next year for Snapdragons A15 S900 till then the E5430 will still destroy it!

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 22:05 11

6. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)


There's a reason why Qualcom is winning though, keep that in mind

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 22:27 6

9. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Exynos chips are exclusive and dearer than Snapdragon!
You pay for what you get!
Just like Apple that never ever will use Snapdragon commercial typical CPU SOC!
®

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 23:02 9

16. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)


Apple is doing better with selling their soc's than Samsung is with their exynos......and Qualcomm is definitely doing better than Sammy with their exynos.

And here's the kicker, even Samsung uses the snapdragon series in their flagships (american market).

So you choose which is loosing and which is winning. Its not all about power, Troll and everyone sees that but you

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 01:02 9

20. rd_nest (Posts: 1605; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)


Apple is doing better with selling their soc's than Samsung...

Apple doesn't sell SOC. Maybe you should go back to school first.

If you don't know something, don't comment.

Samsung uses many SoC in different markets. They have used TI, Qualcomm, Exynos, Intel in US market. They have used many other SoC like NovaThor in other models. They choose what's the cheapest and most practical. Remember, Samsung mobile have to 'purchase' these chips from Samsung semi. They have to pay whatever others also pay. Exynos is one of the most expensive SOCs around.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 01:35 1

25. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Huawei also makes their own phone chips that they use in their good phones.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 05:38 2

35. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)


Apple designed their first soc the A4......then they designed the A5, A5x,A6, A6x.......and Samcrap manufactured them for them....and every time they sell an apple product they sell THEIR SOC, which is selling better than Samsung's exynos by the way .....so you go back to school bro

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 06:30 4

37. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


you mad instagram baby?

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 07:16 2

44. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Apple didn't start designing their own SoCs until just recently with the A6 and A6X. Until last year, they just took Samsung's chips and replaced the GPU.

The A4 was Samsung's Exynos 3 processor with a PowerVR SGX535 instead of the SGX540.

The A5 was an Exynos 4 Dual with a PowerVR SGX543MP2 (MP4 on the A5X) instead of a Mali-400 MP4.

The A6 and A6X actually use Apple's own Swift architecture that they designed themselves, but it's still manufactured by Samsung.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 07:22 2

45. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)


Yea and I guess apple will never tell you that cause you know how they like to claim everything they have lol

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 09:28

53. darkkjedii (Posts: 22025; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


Well said bro. And exactly right +1

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 08:27

51. ph00ny (Posts: 1263; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Qualcomm is winning because no one else designs SoC.

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 21:55 3

4. deadstroke (Posts: 113; Member since: 22 Jan 2013)


very nice indeed

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 21:56 6

5. Tuxedo (Posts: 349; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)


Too bad they always manage to make it lag.

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 22:25 6

8. ebubekir26 (Posts: 322; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


haters will hate,
noobs won't root

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 22:32 5

12. TheLolGuy (Posts: 483; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)


You shouldn't have to if you want a smooth experience. You should root if you want a different experience, not so you can get a lag-free one...

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 01:06 4

22. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


No Android flagship from Q4 2012 and later has experienced lag. The "stutter" on the GS4 is due to a buggy build of TW which was updated. S4 Pro, S600 and Exynos 5410 make phones fly.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 01:35

26. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Nexus 4 here with a custom rom and calibrated display and its smooth as can be, stock is just as smooth.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 04:13

31. TheLolGuy (Posts: 483; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)


Perhaps, but not the Verizon version of the S4. Knowing Verizon, I wouldn't be surprised if they refused to roll out even a simple update like that.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 04:31 1

34. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Touchwiz on the GS4 didn't lag because it was buggy, it lagged because it was bloated. Samsung packed in so many half baked features that the system couldn't handle it. It still isn't lag free even after the updates, at least on the Snapdragon version.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 06:35

40. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Not the system the CPU struggled to keep up even at 1.9!
Why blame Android or Samsung...?

®

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 06:53 5

41. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Because it is Samsung's fault. The Optimus G Pro and HTC One have the same CPU but at lower clock speeds (lower clocked GPU as well) and DDR2 memory (compared to DDR3 on the GS4) and run perfectly. The Galaxy S4 Google Edition runs perfectly as well. The problem is Touchwiz; not Android, and not the Snapdragon 600.

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 07:30

46. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Berzerk all the features on the S4 that is exclusive for a weak CPU that Samsung used was a big mistake. The S800 has the power to push all those extra features. Now imagine live wallpapers were active along with 8widgets it would lag even more. What Android or S4 needs is 6 or 8 cores now!
S600 is a weak CPU for a heavy hungry hog resources like Android. It's a full OS. There isn't a single device out there that that has a 4xA15 device? Those A15s will revolutionize mobile industry along with Tegra4. Yes those were designed for tablets but if equipped with 3000 + mah battery I don't see a problem. A15 and Bay trail chips are on par! These are pure raw power SOCs... ®

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 07:40 7

48. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Android is not the problem, TROLL. It's Samsung. The Snapdragon 600 is a very capable CPU that can push Android on a 1080p display perfectly, it's just Samsung did a half-ass job at optimizing it and bloated the system with their gimmicky features.

A15 power is NOT NEEDED, all that's needed is optimized software, and then we can have all day battery life and flawless operation of our products. But Samsung took a step backwards and completely messed up the GS4 with bloated software.

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 22:31 1

11. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Blame those useless Cortex A8 Arm chips
Even the S600 struggles to push Touch wiz on the S4
S800 will be push and run touchwiz smoooothly

®

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 00:05 4

18. true1984 (Posts: 824; Member since: 23 May 2012)


the exynos version struggles too...

posted on 28 Jul 2013, 00:24 2

19. Arman (Posts: 47; Member since: 08 Jul 2013)


its not S600.. we have exynos version in our country .. and its Awful. samsung gave us one for review.

it takes between 5 to 10 second to open camera app(its not consistent) even after update.. there is so much bug and frame drops.. galaxy S3 had FAR SMOOTHER experience in my opinion.. may be its not a big deal for a non-tech-savy people but for us it doesn't look good..

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories