LG Voyager to land on Sprint, AT&T?

22. (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 12:02 0 0

I dont know where you live buddy but verizon has the BEST coverage out of any carrier in the US. Its been tested and proven. nzw actually sued ATT for advertising "fewest dropped calls"...ever notice how you never see that slogan in their commercials anymore? yea thats because its not true and they were facing a fat lawsuit for false advertising. JD power and associated ranked Verizon number 1 for the past few years now.

23. (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 12:11 0 0

sprint crushes verizon? how? its cant be in revenue seeing as to how verizon is the most profitable carrier in teh US. its cant be in customer base seeing as to how sprint only has around 54m and verizon has 66m. ohhh i know how you guys crush us...its your churn rate! you guys lose more customers than any other carrier in the UNITED STATES!!! congrats you should be proud to work for such great company (and i use that term very loosely)

24. FerneyZan (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 13:02 0 0

Everyone here is fighting for nothing.. First,, The Voyager is NOT an iPhone killer, but the Samsung Instinct for Sprint is, so no idea why there is an argument for anyways. Apperantly, after others got to translate the Korean article, it’s clear that there was a mistake made in the initial article where it say that Sprint and ATT may see a voyager on their lineup.. When in reality is something along the lines saying that LG will bring other touch screen phones to other carriers.. Still, ATT does not need an iPhone killer, and before the end of the summer they will more likely have a 3G iPhone anyways with some improvements. And Sprint with the Instinct, I won’t be too surprise to see them selling lots of them specially since that phone will for sure be a perfect match against the iPhone not to mention that from the start, the Instinct will support the fastest 3G currently available. And with Sprint making big changes in their Customer Service department, things will start going good finally for them.. If I were ATT, I would never worry about VZW. I know that VZW has the better overall network, but the reason ATT still No1 and will be on that spot for a long time, is because they have way more flexibility then VZW does.. I have noticed that VZW has started to give in on a few things here and there, and that will be good for business, but they are by far the most over priced with the least additional options out in the market when it comes to things like Earlier Nights, Rollover, MyFaves etc etc.. The Voyager is an awesome phone and if in the end I do end up moving back to VZW this summer, I will get me one, or get it for my wife since we are starting to TXT a lot lately and IM,, but the Voyager is just a fancier phone, and not a heavy duty to do against phone like Blackberries, or iPhones..

25. (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 14:00 0 0

"Sprints air card doesn't require a voice plan" Verizon's air card does not require a voice plan either.

26. allboutvzw posted on 15 Apr 2008, 14:11 0 0

Right, sound like kids. I've been with AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint and Verizon. Currently with Verizon and I love them. Every company has a flaw, none of them is perfect. Some of them just have more flaws, but the problems with customers/editors is that they expect perfection and there is no such thing and there never will be, that's like expecting perfection in the relationship you in, it would make it boring

27. George (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 15:48 0 0

Just to get this out of the way, Sprint and T-Mobile suck, and AT&T and VZW are tied for first. I doubt any other carrier will get the Voyager. A lot of Lg's phones for Verizon are usually exclusive only to VZW.

28. joe (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 15:52 0 0

To get the $59.99 unlimited air card plan Verizon does require a voice plan and they cap you at 5 gb per month. If you don't have a voice plan with Verizon the unlimited air card plan is $79.99.

29. joe (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 15:55 0 0

Sprint didn't loose customers, IDEN lost them all. The IDEN system was so messed up, boost mobile being the cause. All the shady people using them as "burners" so the cops can't catch them.

30. vzwem (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 16:09 0 0

just to add a few silly cents into this rediculous arguement (we all know sprint wll be sold off within a few years!), if you knew how to read, you would have read that vzw aircards dont require some voice plan. 59.99 is as high as it goes, and that's the 5gb plan.

31. blah (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 17:58 0 0

sprint may not have as many cust as other carriers but they do have way more buisness accounts. some of the accounts that sprint has are massive and dont plan on going any where. vzw and tmobile are more so for consumers to my understanding.

32. some guy (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 19:11 0 0

based off of the standard for which the cellular market bases its customer service, satisfaction, and loyalty, Verizon is MILES ahead of the other major four carriers, Verizon also has the most postpaid customers who's phones actually say Verizon on them, p0wned

33. (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 19:31 0 0

please do not laugh at my highly legitmate and much more helpful previous post....it just shows your immaturity.....and you say that 'every' single phone on verizons network has laready been done by sprint....so lets do a run down: krzr: first rizr: first treo: first 700 pearl: first 8830: first intro of the curve: first razr: first razr2: first treo 750: last touch: last xv6800: last heres a list of all phone that verizon has and sprint does not: smt5800 motorola q9m samsung i760 juke env chocolate xv9400 alias shine flip phone razr maxx ve venus flipshot voyager and soon to be gleam and dare if you consider the facts posted above...verizon copying every single phone....you are sadly mistaken and technologically deprived so i suggest before you make rash statements you know what your talking about first... oh and not one student in scottsdale would be caught dead with a sprint phone running on that ugly black and yellow menu system....everyone either has an env, voyager, sidekick, or iphone...sorry :) verizon is and forever will be better in sprint in every way. thanks

34. Hhahah number 8 (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 19:53 0 0

verizon phones all have the same software so they dont need to test them.

35. (unregistered) posted on 15 Apr 2008, 23:01 0 0

im a verizon sales rep and our aircard DO NOT require a voice pla. the current plans are 39.99 for 50mb or 59.99 for 5gb. the only was the service will be 79.99 is with a one year contract...oh and actually verizon has way more business account inluding federal agencies (fbi, irs and the atf) but you keep thinking that sprint has more...our network is and company overall is geared towards great reception and business, thats why we dont get all of the "cool" phones that come in twenty different colors, thats why we try to defer parents from buying their 16 yr old a blackberry when they have absolutely not need for it. why does verizon make more money than other carriers? its not because our plans are more expensive its because we have more CONTRACTS (very few pre-paid) and more data plans attached to our devices. data is PURE profit for verizon. if im a business man and i need to recieve my email in as many places as possible because its crucial for me to run my business than what network would i choose? the one with the cooler phones, cheaper plans or better over all coverage? ding ding! you got...the one with the better coverage.

36. joe (unregistered) posted on 16 Apr 2008, 08:23 0 0

Sorry I was misinformed by DSL reports.com I read on there you needed a voice plan to get the $59.99 data plan. I retract my statement. But they still limit your use...

37. dont trip (unregistered) posted on 16 Apr 2008, 20:45 0 0

VZW has great coverage and speeds that sprint dreams of. VZW takes the time to test a phone and make sure that the consumer doesnt get a piece of creap phone rather thatn sprint and other carriers just throwing un tested equipment to the masses

38. DeeMan (unregistered) posted on 18 Apr 2008, 22:23 0 0

Sprint's Rev-A is faster? Are you serious. Sprint's broadband service is only at its best when you in the PCS area. Unfortunately, most of Sprint's network is roaming on somebody ELSE'S tower. For that reason, VZW has broadband coverage in more areas. Check Sprint's coverage map if you need proof. Don't even get started on money. Hey, if Verizon has all that money like you say, maybe they can lend some to Sprint ... they lost $29.6 billion in Q4 2007 ( mamma mia!!!!). I don't care who started CDMA, just who's BETTER at it (again, check Sprint's coverage map). You talk about Sprint being the first to unleash those "unlimited" plans. THREE MARKETS? THAT'S IT? You have something that good and release it in THREE markets only? Verizon released their unlimited service NATIONWIDE!!!! As for the customer service, that's EVERYWHERE you go...cell companies, landline companies, hospitals, grocery stores, cable company, ... you name it. You're always gonna run into some moron. To sum things up, if you like Sprint better than VZW, I say, "Whatever floats you boat". But take it from someone who already HAD Sprint ... you are better off with two cups and a string.

39. (unregistered) posted on 29 Apr 2008, 15:12 0 0

this whole thread is like an olympic competition for tards. You all act like what ever you use is the best.....honestly who really cares