LG Prada-like phone comes to AT&T

2. elisa (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2007, 20:52 0 0

dude, you should look up the new vx10000 that verizon is coming out with. i am also guessing that you haven't compaired their internet speeds. i have had both carriers and verizon rocks my world!

3. (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2007, 21:26 0 0

The vx10000 also known as the Voyager sports a full touch screen and opens up to a full qwerty keybord.

4. Jason (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2007, 23:00 0 0

I thought Verizon was coming out with this phone :(

5. celebrity (unregistered) posted on 13 Oct 2007, 02:19 0 0

ugh seriously the voyager is just a wanna be to the real thing the iphone seriously verizon needs to come come out with their own style and not copy others but i love this phone i had sprint,verizon,cingular,and now t-mobile and i think im going back to cingular i mean at&t for this phone or the iphone :D but yea woohoo rocks

6. JJ (unregistered) posted on 13 Oct 2007, 21:38 0 0

Just so you know, Apple begged Verizon to sponser their iPhone over the CDMA network before Apple even considered AT&T. Verizon turned them down for specific reasons that i don't know. The voyager is not a "wanna be" iphone. In fact, it has been in production longer than the iphone, however, i am sure it has been revised since the iphone release. But you can't cant even compare the two phones... they are on 2 seperate networks GSM(iPhone) and CDMA(vx10000). Spec wise the voyager blows the Iphone out of the water.

7. wutchua (unregistered) posted on 13 Oct 2007, 22:00 0 0

Verizon rejected the iPhone for a simple reason: Apple wanted to sell music over the air through iTunes, and Verizon wanted to sell music over the air through Vcast music. Voyager will do everything iPhone can, but better and faster. And cheaper.

8. Mr VZW (unregistered) posted on 14 Oct 2007, 00:40 0 0

With the advent of cellular phones doing double and triple duty as streaming video devices, podcast receivers and email devices, speed is important to those who use the phone for more than making calls. CDMA has been traditionally faster than GSM, though both technologies continue to rapidly leapfrog along this path. Both boast "3G" standards, or 3rd generation technologies. However CDMA, is still the superior technology over GSM. EVDO, also known as CDMA2000, is CDMA's answer to the need for speed with a downstream rate of about 2 megabits per second, though some reports suggest real world speeds are closer to 300-700 kilobits per second (kbps). This is comparable to basic DSL, speeds not currently available with GSM technology. GSM's answer is EDGE (Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution), which boasts data rates of up to 384 kbps with real world speeds reported closer to 70-140 kbps. Proof is in the numbers... Please stop making yourself look uneducated by saying CDMA will never be on top over GSM, because maybe you didnt read the memo... they always have been, and probably always will. CDMA's roots came from Qualcom's Military technology... GSM is cheaper, slower and LESS secure, the ONLY benefit to GSM is that it's Global, so if you plan on taking a trip overseas anytime soon then GSM's your bet! but even still youll be paying more per call, and may even need special featured added onto your account to even be able to do so...

9. iphone (unregistered) posted on 14 Oct 2007, 01:29 0 0

I have the iphone and love it! Verizon passing on the iphone was the biggest mistake ever. 3 other people from my job have it too, and love it. All dropped Verizon. hahaha

10. (unregistered) posted on 14 Oct 2007, 06:26 0 0

hey how the call quality on your new iphones? ohh thats right it sucks. ohh yeah try listening to your music without head phones, and watch that little speaker puss out. the voyager is gunna kick ass

11. FerneyZAN (unregistered) posted on 14 Oct 2007, 09:53 0 0

** PLEASE DELETE BY PREVIOUS POST ** I think this phone might be an improvement over the iPhone,, not to mention that for AT&T it will make it more money.. And Yes, by AT&T having the iPhone does not mean they making as much money as they will with this new phone because of all the restrictions that the iPhone has.. VERIZON who originally walked away from the iPhone missed out, but in my opinion they don't need the iPhone, because Verizon is now committed to bring more and more upto date gadgets, and by bringing some of the new phones to the marker even before than AT&T like the RAZR2, it shows that they are doing just that. In fact, they are due to come out with the new LG VOYAGER, and pound for pound, the Voyager beats the iPhone and this LG CU920 hands down.. Right now I have VERIZON, AT&T and HELIO, and today I will be heading out to the Helio store to return my 2 phones I have with them because they suck. Why? Because they are using Sprint's network and Sprint sucks. There is a reason why Apple try to offer the iPhone to Verizon first and not AT&T or Sprint or T-Mobile, is because they wanted to come to the best network possible to do what they need it to do. AT&T Gladly accepted no matter what the rules were, because they are desperate and they know they needed something to keep them holding on to that No1 spot. Apple has already tried dealing with AT&T thru the first SYNC iTunes mucis player, and it did not worked quite as well as they wanted. But good thing Verizon did not bent on the iPhone, because it shows how much better CDMA networks are over GSM and in case some have not noticed is just a matter of time until VERIZON reclaims the number ONE spot again and that is without doing any major mergers.. hahaha!! In fact, if it had not for the iPhone IMO, Verizon would been looking at #1 again by the end of the year.

12. iphone (unregistered) posted on 14 Oct 2007, 14:28 0 0

I can't belive you are comparing the Voyager to the iphone. WOW!!! LMAO.... That's the best you can do. I like Verizon, but you loose all respect for that comparison

13. (unregistered) posted on 14 Oct 2007, 15:00 0 0

to mr vzw "EVDO, also known as CDMA2000, is CDMA's answer to the need for speed with a downstream rate of about 2 megabits per second, though some reports suggest real world speeds are closer to 300-700 kilobits per second (kbps). This is comparable to basic DSL, speeds not currently available with GSM technology. GSM's answer is EDGE (Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution), which boasts data rates of up to 384 kbps with real world speeds reported closer to 70-140 kbps" at&t has had a high speed network called 3G for a decent length of time. their max throughput is about 1.8 mbits per sec which for all intensive purposes is right on par with verizon's evdo..their average through put is the same about 300 - 700 kb per sec so why you would say that their answer to evdo is edge is ridiculous..maybe YOU didn't get the memo

14. F. Wheezy (unregistered) posted on 15 Oct 2007, 08:51 0 0

People hear about a apple product and walk like zombies to buy it. Don't belive all the hype...WOW U CAN TOUCH THE SCREEN! Grow up and get a blackberry.

15. iphone (unregistered) posted on 15 Oct 2007, 18:12 0 0

Chad. As a matter of fact I'm in the technology field, and make 6 figures. I'm sure I know more than you do. If you get a chance, read some cell phone blogs, and you'll start to see how many customers are upset with Verizon right now over crippled cell phones, being raped by charges, and being offered pda's 2 years old. You want to talk about outdated? How can you call the iphone outdated when it has the newest technology such as visual voice mail, and the best browser on a phone to date. And Verizon is still selling the 6700 for $400??? ($300 with the online discount). What decade did that phone come out. You were supposed to come out with 6800 since last year. Which a lot of people including myself were waiting for. Verizon needs to listen to their customers. I'm not coming back!!! Sincerely, Satisfied

16. w0rd? (unregistered) posted on 16 Oct 2007, 17:40 0 0

hahaha you make such a long post which is just a waste. you compare verizon 3G to AT&T's 2.5G. If you compare AT&T 3G you will see that it is faster than VZW 3G. I commonly get 1000kbps on my AT&T data card.