LG Optimus G battery life is better than the Samsung Galaxy S III, claims an LG experiment

6. Ohrules posted on 16 Oct 2012, 04:56 15 0

wait a second, why is the first comment marked as 2?

7. Seymur posted on 16 Oct 2012, 05:01 4 0

first one just got deleted

17. GuiltyBystander posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:05 5 2

It's a conspiracy!

18. TROLL posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:09 4 2

Your avatar makes me laugh.

• This comment is posted in response to #17 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #17 Hide

15. addicted2088 posted on 16 Oct 2012, 06:46 5 1

And I'd take a Super AMOLED with its deep blacks any day over LG's "True HD" display. The SAMOLED on the GNex with its all black design on the front is just stunning to look at :|

25. Jericho posted on 16 Oct 2012, 08:07 2 0

Well Optimus G doesn't have TrueHD IPS display Thats a year old display.
It has Super IPS+ Display get your facts right.

27. addicted2088 posted on 16 Oct 2012, 08:19 3 3

Okay, it's a TrueHD IPS+ display, but it still isn't going to have as deep blacks as an SAMOLED.

Not saying the display is bad, but SAMOLED's blacks have spoiled me, LCD displays just can't match it no matter how good they might be. :(

• This comment is posted in response to #25 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #25 Hide

28. OpTiMuS_BlAcK posted on 16 Oct 2012, 08:25 1 3

The 3310 has the best blacks of all phones.

• This comment is posted in response to #27 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #27 Hide

31. jan25 posted on 16 Oct 2012, 11:35 2 0

i'am willing to trade deep blacks for a brighter and sharper screen. i also do a lot of browsing and reading, so LG's screen would be easier on the battery in that regard. i think it's a matter of taste though when you are choosing between the two.

34. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 16 Oct 2012, 13:00 1 2

ewwww amoled is so garbage with its dim and blueish tint......no way its better than this screen samsung fan boys

35. bayusuputra posted on 16 Oct 2012, 19:00 1 0

I'd take a full RGB anyday.. the S-LCD in my Desire S looks sharper than the SuperAMOLED in the One S.. Despite the same resolution..

23. addicted2088 posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:28 8 0

Also, 28nm processor on the Optimus G vs 32nm on S3, so not sure how much this battery test means. But good to see the Optimus G having great battery life.

24. doejon posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:32 2 2

wait, wait.. what about removable battery ;-)

5. Seymur posted on 16 Oct 2012, 04:56 24 0

you're wrong all the time.

11. eisenbricher posted on 16 Oct 2012, 05:31 3 0

and battery type shouldn't affect the aforementioned benchmarks. Battery type only matters in the long term use, and of course also in the weight.

14. wendygarett (limited) 5 days ago posted on 16 Oct 2012, 06:15 6 0

Ok, thank you for the infomation :)

19. TROLL posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:10 4 1

Welcome, pleasure.

• This comment is posted in response to #14 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #14 Hide

30. predator93 posted on 16 Oct 2012, 10:41 1 0

4X HD uses Li po and it was the worst overall performer (among quadcores ) in battery tests conducted by gsmarena, but it has a good standby time( hence better endurance rating).
In general Lithium polymer battery is good for light usage and lithium ion is good for heavy usage.

http://www.gsmarena.com/quad_core_shootout-review-790p3.php

9. bobfreking55 posted on 16 Oct 2012, 05:22 3 1

and that is why I will get an LG NEXUS!

21. TROLL posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:16 2 2

What about the Sony Nexus?

26. Jericho posted on 16 Oct 2012, 08:09 0 0

Did i hear software updates?

Why not buy The NEXUS 4?

20. blahb posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:13 3 1

In other news: "Samsung Galaxy S3 battery is removable", Yeah, I think I'll take that one also having removable storage...

22. kamejoko posted on 16 Oct 2012, 07:25 0 1

32nm with HKMG, 28nm with Sion/Poly. do you understand?.