LG Optimus 3D Max gets benchmarked
ran the stereoscopic (that means it offers 3D images without glasses, of course) handset through the benchmark tests. On the Quadrant benchmark, the LG Optimus 3D Max tallied a score of 2314, 277 points above the first-gen model. On Nenamark2, the original outscored the sequel as the LG Optimus 3D Max got 31.7 fps, while the LG Optimus 3D scored 33. But the newer unit reclaimed superiority on the AnTuTu Benchmark.
You do need to keep in mind that because the device used for the testing of the LG Optimus 3D Max is a pre-release model, there could be some more work that LG plans to do with the handset. The phone is expected to be launched sometime this quarter with a 4.3 inch IPS LCD screen with WVGA resolution and a pixel density of 217 ppi. 1GB of RAM is on board and the 8GB of native storage can be pumped up to 40GB using the device's microSD slot. On back is a 5MP dual lens camera with AF and LED flash. The camera captures 3D images and records video in 1080p. 3D video is captured in 720p. Android 2.3 is installed although LG promises an update to Android 4.0.
We were able to get our hands on the LG Optimus 3D Max during MWC 2012 in Barcelona and you can check out the results by clicking on the video below.
1. cheetah2k (Posts: 1116; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)
What a waste. This needs Tegra III inside at the very least to make it desirable.
2. rayman173 (Posts: 61; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
Is this coming on AT&T? Or is it just going to be an international phone?
3. Cwebb (Posts: 501; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)
Get with it LG. The Evo had a 3D screen with qHD last year and now you want to sell one with WVGA? I laugh at your feeble attempt to sell smartphones!
4. u-suck-more (Posts: 529; Member since: 26 Aug 2011)
LG said the 3D tech is not suitable for higher res screens yet that's why it was using WVGA. and i believe LG, cos they spent more time developing and researching with 3D than HTC did. when i was buying my phone, i ended up choosing the Optimus 3D over the Evo 3D because it was a better phone all round and had better 3D effects. in my local newspaper, they did a comparison between the O3D and E3D and they concluded with 'The LG is the better of the two phones. LG made a 3D phone and concentrated on making it into a phone that can be used everyday, whereas HTC made a 2D phone and simply added 3D functions to it' and somewhere in between tt article it said 'it is evident that LG had spent more time researching and developing stereoscopic 3D than HTC did' now i know that u are using the E3D and i don't why to argue with you which phone is better, i believe everyone has the right to their own opinions. i just thought tt this should be brought up.. have a nice day (: