LG, Huawei, and ZTE in close fight for third largest smartphone manufacturer
0. phoneArena 27 Jul 2013, 18:02 posted on
As we see economic measurements make their way across various news sites, the technology sector is...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Mizraab (Posts: 25; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)
Huawei is gonna beat ZTE and may be LG too who knows. LG G2 will decide LG's fate
15. hemedans (Posts: 437; Member since: 01 Jun 2013)
dont u see above figure? zte grow fast more than huawei.
19. ihatesmartphone (unregistered)
Where is Nokia?
2. sebaa (Posts: 28; Member since: 30 Jun 2009)
Haven't Sony won to be the 3 largest smartphone manufacturer, end they have become?
7. pyradark (Posts: 821; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
They are still eyeing for 3rd. but ther pricing is way way above, still income is what really matter not the total unit sales. Dont forget LG sold 12M with 2.4B income same as Sony with only 8.1M of unit sales
11. smallworld (Posts: 483; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
True. The average selling price of Sony should be higher than LG, Huawei, ZTE or Lenovo.
3. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Out of all those brands I would choose:
Zte > LG > Huawei
4. iGeek (Posts: 171; Member since: 15 Mar 2013)
As we all know since samsung copied some of its "S" feature from LG phones ! I think its LG turn to shine ! The G2 will be a beast but sorry LG I will get an iPhone 5S, cause I invested way too much in "i" stuff
5. jdoee100 (Posts: 334; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
As seen in this chart, Nokia and Sony have no presence in the smartphone market, but their fans surely like to boast and talk smack.
17. sri_tech (Posts: 188; Member since: 21 May 2013)
May be because they innovate more than other companies in the chart and their designs among the best.
Is there any single feature thats innovative from ZTE, Huawei or even LG?
I can say many things about Nokia.
1. 808 is the best Camera smartphone. There is no context at all. In an year, they managed to put the same camera in much thinner and lighter body with 1020. Even they added Optical Image Stabilization, better images at night etc..
2. Lumia 920 is the first phone with display that works with gloves, keys, etc..
It also has highest screen refresh rate than any smartphone.
3. 920 is the first phone to have Optical image stabilization, great imaging in the dark without flash.
4. It has better sunlight readability than any other phone out there.
Sony also makes better designs and water resistant technology etc..
20. DONUT (Posts: 401; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)
im sorry, but LG does innovate. Have u taken a look at their screen technologies? LG makes the best LCDs screens out there. And LG has been pushing Android hardware most, first dual core, first quad core, first dual core LTE phone, first glassesless 3D phone and etc... LG also has some really nicely designed phones (Optimus G, Optimus Black, PRADA Phone 3.0 and lets not forget their feature phones like the Chocolate series). And come on, im pretty sure u know point 4 on ur list is hardly innovation. Sunlight legibility is dependent on how reflective a screen is, it depends on the coating the manufacturers put on their screen. you can have the brightest screen out there but if your glass is super reflective, your sunlight legibility goes down the drain too
23. Altair (Posts: 367; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)
Who cares about LG or its LCD tech anyway? It steals everything else and then afterwards paying license fees.
26. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
Denial is a b*tch isn't it! Dude LG innovate more than Nokia do, end of! All Nokia's innovations are useless camera tech!
31. HASHTAG (unregistered)
Who doesn't care about LG or it's LCD tech? Well I do, and who would not care about their awesome LCD tech? You must like crappy displays.
32. DONUT (Posts: 401; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)
b*tch sit your $5 a*s down. LG's display are class leading and LG isn't the only company that "steals". lets not forget one of the inspirations for the iPhone design is the original LG Prada. please talk to me when Windows Phone gets at least 10% of marketshare
39. nnjerzy (Posts: 113; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)
I have the Sony Xperia Z and the camera on that phone is great,, better than i have ever seen or had,, i switched from Sammy quick and havent looked back yet. Plus the phone feels premium
8. shamataa (Posts: 211; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)
No HTC on the list?. I guess the HTC One isn't enough for one company
18. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Right where they belong, not in the top 5.
27. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
Altair is going down
12. GeekMovement (Posts: 2135; Member since: 09 Sep 2011)
This is very all opinion based and only through my experience in Sprint's network, but I swapped my Samsung Galaxy S4 for the HTC One and I love almost everything about it except for the fact that it seems to get hot so much quicker than the galaxy did. I would have it in my hands for maybe 5 minutes and the battery temperature would read 105 F (simple tasks like viewing calendar, messaging, etc). Flawed device? Don't know as it seems many others have similar problems, but I'm moving back to the Galaxy S4 and my flip cover. HTC was close to having a Galaxy killer for me.
Sony never makes their phones available in all of the US carriers which is disappointing (I think most carriers have it excluding Sprint). I would definitely love to give their technology a try. (Bring the Xperia Z Ultra!)
I'm personally really disappointed with LG's design on their G2. Their prada design and the Optimus G on AT&T (Sprint's version looks and feels cheap) had wonderful designs that I'd get right away.
Never had ZTE before. Only seen a low-mid ranging phone on Sprint's network.
After reading the Huawei article on spys, I think I'd rather prefer to spend my money on a different company. Their Ascend P2 was very iphone inspired too.
I think at least Nokia should be #3 if not Sony. I know this is probably impossible at the moment, but it would be cool to see Blackberry come back too.
Either way, I'd like to look into a different company to switch from Samsung since they're doing more than good enough financially. HTC was a little disappointing to me, but I'd give them another try in the future. Sad that right now Samsung and HTC are the only top end new devices on Sprint at the moment so there's not much selection for me. Looking forward to 2014!
13. ryq24 (Posts: 681; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Don't count Lenovo out yet, The Chinese mobile phone makers have a huge advantage since most People can't afford to buy expensive phones like Samsung and iPhone. Lg could be knock out of the top five soon.
14. 1113douglas (Posts: 193; Member since: 04 Jul 2013)
Hey apple users, you think your the best. Look Samsung is DOUBLE the market share and DOUBLE the Vendor Shipments! SO stop telling me the iphone is the best!
21. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4270; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
Samsung also has like 10 times more products on the market than Apple does. When you flood the market and have a recognized brand name like Samsung, it's hard not to be on top. If Apple released a new product every week or so, they would dominate Samsung.
30. linneti15 (Posts: 49; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)
If that were true and if it was that simple to do that, please tell me why apple hasn't done that?
If apple only releasing one product and Samsung releasing many has caused Samsung to dominate then what is apple doing about it? Crying and saying its not fair and only because samsung release more devices?
Both companies are trying to make as much money as possible and if apple could dominate Samsung by releasing a product every week or so like you say would be so easy I think they would have done it already. You said, "it's hard not to be on top" so why aren't apple at the top?
35. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4270; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
Watch the first minute and a half of WWDC 2013. The opening sequence explains Apple's strategy in the market. Basically, they take the approach of a few high quality products rather than flooding the market with products of varying quality, which is questionable, but it's been working well for them so far.
You could say Samsung has a more broad handle on the market, appealing to everyone's needs/wants, but Apple doesn't work like that. They want to make the highest quality and most reliable products they can; they've succeeded in that and it paid off.
Typical question: With all these leaks cheap iPhone being made with a glossy, plastic, multi color body instead of the usual glass/metal that makes up current Apple products, isn't Apple taking down their standards?
Answer: Kind of. The more recent leaks point it as being the replacement of the iPhone 5 when the 5S comes out. It will have the same specs as the 5, but in a plastic body to reduce costs, and will probably be sold cheaply. That doesn't necessarily mean that it will lack in quality compared to other Apple devices, though. Yeah, the plastic body will be kind of cheap, but the entire experience will be maintained and up to Apple's standards.
They're maintaining the quality of the experience while still reducing costs, which is better than what Samsung does.
16. MartianMe (unregistered)
the funny thing is that apple is not a manufacturer .... they use other real manufacturers and assembled everything in china.
22. Altair (Posts: 367; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)
What is point of this article? For example Nokia has sold more than 40 million phones in that Q. The problem is that these "lists" doesn't count Nokia Asha phones at all. A cheap Asha offers more than any of those useless laggy Android junkies at the same price category.
All those Asian OEM:s are just cheap copycats making the money with copied innovations. Just a punch of thiefs. Only LG knows something about LCD screen tech, but who cares about LCD anyway? At the end of the day all these little thieves are paying license fees to MS anyway.
28. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
Your a special little boy aren't you! Not only are you being racist, you think Nokia is the best! And then you go on to say feature phones are better than android! Retard Alert!
33. DONUT (Posts: 401; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)
these "little thieves" are doing well without using WP8 though, says a lot about WP8
34. OpTiMuS_BlAcK (Posts: 418; Member since: 04 May 2012)
I'm with LG, still won't trust the Chinese phones with all the things going around them.
36. roscuthiii (Posts: 2148; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
I'm not familiar enough with Huawei and ZTE, but there are times when I miss the QWERTY my old EnV had.
Lucky Goldstar gets my +1.
37. ceorounak (Posts: 1; Member since: 28 Jul 2013)
I think LG should win it, LG produces good smartphones like G Pro and many else, they should definitely win that position.
38. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3702; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
I want Sammy's brother on the top 3 list.