LG Dare now on Verizon's InfoManager intranet
0. phoneArena posted on 20 Jun 2008, 20:57
The highly anticipated LG Dare is now listed on Verizon's InfoManager site...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
28. (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 09:41 0 0
it has the Rev A chip in it. I'd assume eventually it will run of the Rev A for the browser
35. (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 11:28 0 0
Yes it will be Rev A at launch. I will remind everyone in this thread that you cannot compare the iphone 3g with this phone as the iphone 3g is a PDA and this is a consumer handset. Two different leagues, NOT competing with each other.
47. (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 15:20 0 0
Full retail is 409.99, 2-yr is 250.00, and 1-yr. I'm assuming will be 299.99 or 316.99. But there's also the $50 online discount if you order it from verizonwireless.com
93. Esquire0399 posted on 22 Jun 2008, 19:20 0 0
If you buy the Dare in the store, you will receive a $50 mail-in rebate so ultimately the phone is the same price whether you buy in online in a store.
105. (unregistered) posted on 23 Jun 2008, 09:12 0 0
the 2 year price is $199.99 AFTER $50 MIR not before
122. (unregistered) posted on 23 Jun 2008, 23:29 0 0
Today I called Verizon and spoke with a rep, She says that the phoe will be $249 after $50 online rebate.
11. (unregistered) posted on 20 Jun 2008, 23:07 0 0
Wait, so will it be possible to send pics taken on the 3.2 meg camera as pix messages? I mean, if not it kind of makes the entire camera worthless...thoughts please! Also, do you think that it will have a T9/iTAP text entry function?
15. (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 00:01 0 0
yes it will, the phone makes a copy and re sizes the pic before sending it
65. (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 18:25 0 0
thats retarted though. you have to resize each time before you want to send a picture. sounds a little inconvenient
78. (unregistered) posted on 22 Jun 2008, 00:34 0 0
you don't have to resize it, the phone does all that in the background. sames speed as sending a regular pix message.
80. LessthanZach posted on 22 Jun 2008, 02:44 0 0
I'm curious how it is worthless to have a 3.2 meg camera that won't send 3.2 pix msgs? Not saying that it doesn't, but if it didn't, it would still be nice to have the option for the higher res to take a pic of something you would like to print out via bluetooth....
87. (unregistered) posted on 22 Jun 2008, 14:37 0 0
Every LG phone I've had through Verizon for the last two years have been able to print via Bluetooth. This includes the original Chocolate, enV, VX8700, and the newer Chocolate. It would be safe to assume that this LG phone will have that same basic capability. Also, I have been able to transfer the pictures via Bluetooth with my Mac. If your computer doesn't have Bluetooth, there is always the memory card that you can utilize. Hope this helps..
88. (unregistered) posted on 22 Jun 2008, 18:20 0 0
Ok...and what if you want to take a picture....and not send it? Still worthless?
106. (unregistered) posted on 23 Jun 2008, 10:12 0 0
I have a Flipshot 3.0MP. It DOES email me my pictures at full 3MP resolution. I actually use it occassionally as an impromptu camera so I can email co-workers pictures of parts during online meetings. I see no reason an extra .2 megapixels would cause it not to send. I'm more curious about the VGA video.
120. (unregistered) posted on 23 Jun 2008, 22:17 0 0
since when is it illegal to actually LOOK at the pictures on ur phone? um it isnt... maybe thats why Lg stuck a nice 3.2meg camera on there with a very nice lenz... so u can enjoy the pics on ur phone.. ya know god forbid the picture of some guy playing beer pong or thet topless pic of some girl floating around school isnt in the sharpest of quality! dont be so damn nit picky and enjoy the nice phone Verizon actualy has for once??
123. (unregistered) posted on 24 Jun 2008, 10:49 0 0
I have the Flipshot and it DOES NOT send pics at the full 3 MP resolution. It copies and resizes the pic then sends it.
20. sdog99 (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 07:51 0 0
well I know that the Voyagers touch screen was heat sensitive, so I think that this one should have a better touch screen
29. (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2008, 09:51 0 0
Yeah no.. Voyager screen is touch sensative (resistive) not electromagnetic.. You must be thinking of the Glyde
30. Esquire0399 posted on 21 Jun 2008, 09:54 0 0
The Voyager's touchscreen is not heat sensitive. It is pressure sensitive. Where did you get that from?