Jury in Apple-Samsung trial makes corrections to verdict documents, leaves damages unchanged
The jury returned to the courthouse on Monday and made the necessary corrections to the paperwork. The jury ruled that Samsung had also infringed on the forgotten item, and awarded Apple $4 million.
However, instead of adding $4 million to the final tally, it shuffled other numbers from the awarded damages around and left the final bill at the previously reported $119.5 million. So, even though Apple was seeking at least $2 billion in damages, and even though the jury made an error in their arguably slap-on-the-wrist judgments, and even though the jury forgot one of the patents in dispute and had to account for damages, the outcome remains the same.
With these final corrections, now we can close the latest chapter in a world that is Apple and Samsung. As Samsung is appealing the $900+ million ruling against it from the previous litigation, it is probably likely we may see both sides appeal this as well. That means we will ever more be in a world that is Apple versus Samsung.
1. Sauce (unregistered)
In related news: Samsung gets a visit by government / police officials (after not cooperating) so Samsung employees switch out all the computers and literally eat and swallow documented evidence.
3. Topcat488 (Posts: 1170; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
Samsung will get their money back by raising the price of Apples' SoC again. So in the end Samsung and their employees, will win the war, gaining more publicity and Apple will just have to swallow the price hike... The only winners are the lawyers for Apple. O.o
7. Sauce (unregistered)
Lol thats not how it works. A few dollar hike increase won't change the outcome of the richest wealthiest tech company in the world :D
5. hung2900 (Posts: 817; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
Can you read? It's a troll article, what the ******ing relation here? Related my...
8. Sauce (unregistered)
Can you read? "It details the back-story behind the two smartphone giants and the public trial"
9. willard12 (Posts: 866; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Phonearena is looking for new authors and I guess this is your audition. However, when passing along troll articles against Samsung......you may want to avoid stories from 2010 about price fixing. Price fixing is Apple's thing in 2014. I guess you're saying that whether it's larger screens, notifications, group play, or price fixing...Apple loves copying Samsung. They are indeed good artists.
10. Sauce (unregistered)
Good to see that haters will reply to everything that has Apple involved in a comment lol.
13. networkdood (Posts: 6310; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
Hey, leave Sauce alone - his avatar picture tells you all that you need to know about him...
17. Ashoaib (Posts: 2378; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Sauce's phone is 10x better then others so plz dont waste time reading his words, argueing on his useless stories, reading his propaganda sources...
14. networkdood (Posts: 6310; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
Funny how this country's citizens see the word "ALLEGEDLY" and assume guilt...
20. tuminatr (Posts: 685; Member since: 23 Feb 2009)
Exactlery amazing how allegedly is not innocent tel proven guilty anymore, if this was admissable in court somsung probibly would have lost
4. androtaku (Posts: 196; Member since: 12 Dec 2013)
$900 million, just give it up samsung....clash of clan game can rake in that amount in a quarter
6. androiphone20 (Posts: 1510; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)
Can't see Dunham's statement anywhere, I think it would have made sense if it was included in the article. Anyway, even when both parties had their fair share Samsung might go on with their unethical ways. I can also see a pending appeal if Apple doesn't settle with Samsung, the data detectors patent that Samsung infringed on is also being used on newer devices like the Galaxy s4, note 3 & s5.
11. PBXtech (Posts: 980; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)
Both companies are unethical, Apple was found guilty of fixing prices on ebooks. Both should walk away and let the courts handle more important cases, like putting hardcore criminals behind bars.
12. 0xFFFF (Posts: 3612; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)
The ironic thing is that Apple deserves to have some large company copy them. Apple has a history of stealing from others that is decades long.
What goes around, comes around.
15. networkdood (Posts: 6310; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
Exactly, these trials are a big waste of time...makes Apple look worse with each passing year.
16. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6678; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
iJuror. how the hell can they make a mistake? This trial is so BIAS.
18. superfans (Posts: 151; Member since: 30 Jul 2012)
Even though it's a BIAS but samsung did a lot of bad things in the pass such as steal sharp technology for its tv and also steal pioneer Plasma technology and caused pioneer to shut down its tv business. Further more , galaxy s series really did a lot of copycat from iPhone you can see it from the packaging to its software . I think samsung really deserve it and I do own a S4 and iPhone 4s.
19. techperson211 (Posts: 707; Member since: 27 Feb 2014)
The point here is that every company copies one another but it seems to me that apple is claiming that their so called innovation is the legit one.