Judge issues injunction on Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1

3. Ravail posted on 26 Jun 2012, 21:58 16 1

Lol this is Apple at its best.. It sees Android taking over its future in the mobile industry, so they are spending their every penny to ban anything android!

7. Droid_X_Doug posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:03 5 1

Sounds like an iPyrrhic victory to me.

23. bayusuputra posted on 26 Jun 2012, 23:34 5 1

they want to ban the original 10.1 Tab? go ahead! that tab is not really a punchline in samsung's arsenal.. let's wait for Note 10.1.. anyway, samsung's strong point is always its Galaxy S line of phones..

45. jogutier posted on 27 Jun 2012, 14:28 0 0

Does that mean I can return my t?ablet to bestbuy?

22. JcHnd posted on 26 Jun 2012, 23:26 9 1

maybe iSue.com

36. fishywishy posted on 27 Jun 2012, 05:27 2 2

Why would u put Phonearena down? they are reporting the news. not placing the lawsuits. get a clue and stop being a sheepboy.

37. RORYREVOLUTION posted on 27 Jun 2012, 05:55 3 0

Not putting phonearena down just stating 90 percent of their articles are about apple lawsuits, it was a joke anyway. Of course if you weren't such a tight ass fan boy yourself you'd realize that.

41. good2great posted on 27 Jun 2012, 09:12 1 0

you are totally exaggerating...lol

its waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more android articles than iphone...

• This comment is posted in response to #37 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #37 Hide

46. fishywishy posted on 27 Jun 2012, 18:15 0 0

I own a S3 and never used or owned an iphone... not a fanboy and ur not funny

• This comment is posted in response to #37 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #37 Hide

6. frydaexiii posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:02 7 1

Yeah, read somewhere that Apple just patented wireless charging, stealing from Samsung and Palm ehh? So much for "blatent copying". The article will come to PhoneArena soon.

17. chadrick0814 posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:48 3 1

I'm sure they'll put it on the shelf next to their face unlock patent.

24. bayusuputra posted on 26 Jun 2012, 23:39 3 1

saw the article on flipboard.. and i was like: flip the table..

15. CellularNinja posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:28 7 1

In a way that is true. I read the Steve Jobs bio and it does say that the graphical interface first used in the Apple I computer was actually stolen from another company. And that is a fact.

18. JGuinan007 posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:51 5 2

I think they stole that from Xerox

31. roscuthiii posted on 27 Jun 2012, 04:05 3 2

Yep, stolen from Xerox PARC... many of the iDefenders will claim that Apple paid for use of the GUI, but what was actually paid for was a tour. A tour! Jobs & Co. saw the GUI and ran with it. Unfortunately for Xerox they did not realize they had a valid suit at the time, were still trying to work out licensing with Apple, or just didn't have the resources allocated for legal action (not sure which), but they didn't file a suit in time.

• This comment is posted in response to #18 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #18 Hide

47. stealthd posted on 27 Jun 2012, 19:32 0 0

Yeah that's not what happened. They did go on a tour. Then they made a deal to license technology in exchange for investing in Apple. As soon as Apple went public, that investment paid off. So no, nothing was "stolen" (besides the fact you can't "steal" an idea in the first place), they gave it away.

• This comment is posted in response to #31 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #31 Hide

39. CellularNinja posted on 27 Jun 2012, 08:25 0 1

Oh yeah that's who it was. That's just wrong on so many levels. Especially considering the way they handle themselves legally nowadays. . .

• This comment is posted in response to #18 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #18 Hide

13. GeekMovement posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:28 6 1

So true.

43. MARKSPEAR77 posted on 27 Jun 2012, 10:04 0 0

in short they paid the judge, lol....

16. jove39 posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:47 6 4

Stealing what?

20. RORYREVOLUTION posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:58 7 5

The Apple Fanboy trolls never have any proof or anything logical to say. They are just mindless sheep waiting for the Apple Slaughterhouse.

25. taco50 (banned) posted on 26 Jun 2012, 23:56 2 4

They lost the case. That would be considered proof.

• This comment is posted in response to #20 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #20 Hide

26. ardent1 posted on 27 Jun 2012, 00:35 3 1

There's been an adjudication as in someone with legal authority discerned the facts.

Please stop being unctuous for a change.

• This comment is posted in response to #20 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #20 Hide

42. good2great posted on 27 Jun 2012, 09:15 0 0

its funny how u call the guy a troll when he is basically stating a FACT about the article...

but to be real... you are the troll for coming here angry about the case...lol

and the name calling....smh

• This comment is posted in response to #20 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #20 Hide

28. ardent1 posted on 27 Jun 2012, 01:03 2 2

jove39: do you not understand English -- did you not learn the legal term "infringe". Samsung was using Apple's IP without Apple's permission. This shouldn't be a hard concept to understand.

29. Killer_Instinct posted on 27 Jun 2012, 03:57 0 2

- Multitasking is stupid on phones
- 4G is overrated
- 3.5 inches is the perfect screen size, any bigger than that and the phone becomes unusable
- if you use stylus you blew it
- iPad-style tablet computers with smaller 7in screens would be “dead on arrival”

27. RapidCat posted on 27 Jun 2012, 00:41 6 1

and u make the wrong decision :)

30. Killer_Instinct posted on 27 Jun 2012, 03:58 2 2

- Multitasking is stupid on phones
- 4G is overrated
- 3.5 inches is the perfect screen size, any bigger than that and the phone becomes unusable
- if you use stylus you blew it
- iPad-style tablet computers with smaller 7in screens would be “dead on arrival”

34. frydaexiii posted on 27 Jun 2012, 04:36 1 1

Says the fanboys who are using a phone that can't do any of that.

"iPad-style tablet computers with smaller 7in screens would be “dead on arrival”" Yeah and somehow Apple has 7 inch iPads on testing.

This is almost like us fandroids saying "apps are overated". But we can't really say that since most good developers are already developing for Android too.

35. Killer_Instinct posted on 27 Jun 2012, 04:41 2 0

sarcasm :)

• This comment is posted in response to #34 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #34 Hide

33. frydaexiii posted on 27 Jun 2012, 04:31 1 1

Yes, moral victory. Guess even the judge knows that the iPhone 5 is going to fail along with iOS6 and she'd rather just allow the ban on a discontinued product so Apple can feel better about themselves than having to deal with more of this crap when the iPhone 5 comes out and Apple sues Samsung for creating a better phone.

38. Non_Sequitur posted on 27 Jun 2012, 06:29 1 0

...because Samsung is blatantly copying. At all. How are they copying? The Galaxy Tab is NOTHING like the iPad. The operating systems are NOTHING ALIKE. In your mind, anything that has little square tiles is copying. Apple gets a thousand patents a day.