x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Judge denies Apple request to punish Samsung for leaking evidence; warns against more "theatrics"

0. phoneArena 03 Aug 2012, 18:30 posted on

Friday it was both Apple and Samsung's turn to together feel the wrath of Judge Lucy Koh as the judge first denied Apple's request to sanction Samsung for sending previously excluded evidence to the media; the judge then told both parties that she would not put up with any more "theatrics or sideshows"...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 00:13 5

42. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Do not be an iDIOT, Taco....oh....too late - nevermind

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 19:43 6

22. pkiran1996 (Posts: 166; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)


Because what Apple are requesting is ridiculous and petty. And if she censored evidence from Apple we all know you would be crying your eyes out in your little troll hub.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 20:07 2

24. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


I know good n well you are not trying to act all holier than tho....

Is this where pot...meets...kettle?

And since the judge doesnt want actual old phones Samsung made allowed....F700...and development ideas from Samsung, yet allows Apple's.....I dont see how you care about facts...since that decision favors Apple.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 20:52 10

26. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


Actually, before you commented, not a SINGLE OTHER PERSON voiced a different general opinion about Koh than that which we have been saying. Most of Koh's decisions in this case have still been ludicrous in their bias against Samsung. Now, finally, today, she has made a correct decision regarding this case. People have said this was a good decision, but not the rest.

Your reading comprehension fails you again, Taco.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 21:30 1

27. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)


Judge must have finally gotten a free galaxy s3 lol

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 21:45 1

29. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


So ludicrous decision = anything in Apple's favor

Correct decision = anything in Samsung's favor.

You guys could care less about the facts. Apple could produce an audio recording of Samsung's whole design team admitting to copying the iPhone and you'd still deny Samsung did anything wrong.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 22:10 10

32. willard12 (Posts: 1722; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Samsung could produce a video of an Apple CEO stating that Apple has been shameless about stealing great ideas from others and you still wouldn't admit that Apple copies........and that's not a hypothetical.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 01:31 2

55. tmcr7 (Posts: 180; Member since: 02 Nov 2011)


taco50 wouldn't care about the facts.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 23:14 9

36. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


If Apple produces any evidence of willful intent to continue copying Apple designs with no attempt to add their own spin on them, I will admit that Samsung f**ked up.

However, and I have the screenshot to prove this, you openly admitted that you hope Apple gets patents for things they didn't invent, like Android's notification system, just so they can attack Android with those patents.

This revealed, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that you care nothing for righteousness in this case. Like Apple, you just want Android gone for good no matter what the cost.

You can never get away from that comment, Taco. I have it saved for perpetuity.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 23:51 4

37. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


lol...I remember that day....I could see the steam coming from your post...lol.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 00:24 3

49. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


I was simply flabbergasted that he could be so morally bankrupt.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 00:15 5

44. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


I read Taco comments and I lose brain matter by the post....

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 01:29 2

53. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


Sniggly I want the fair thing to happen. Samsung copied Apple and should be punished for it.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 01:36 5

56. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


You asked for it.

https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/107754956401440611752/albums/5760121152570348625

Do you deny saying this?

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 01:52 1

57. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


Can't see it I don't have a google + account

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 02:01 6

58. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


Yeah, except you're full of s**t. I've tested the link on browsers where I'm not signed into Plus, and I can see the picture just fine.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 02:26

59. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


I seriously can't see it

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 03:09 2

63. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


You have to be kidding me. What browser are you using?

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 04:07 5

67. RapidCat (Posts: 351; Member since: 12 Jun 2012)


he using safari browser, thats why, hahahaha

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 08:40 1

74. Aeires (unregistered)


Just ignore him, he's just commenting to get attention. If he doesn't get it, he'll move somewhere where people will give him what he wants. Stop replying to him if he doesn't have anything worthwhile to add to the conversation.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 03:14 6

64. willard12 (Posts: 1722; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


The link says," Taco50: What would be great is if Apple can patent their notifications and go after Google."

1. In this quote you acknowledge Apple copies Google.
2. You advocate patent trolling.

If you acknowledge that Apple copies, Steve Jobs admits to shamelessly stealing, why do you continue to go on and on and on and on about the perceived copying of others?

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 03:21 4

65. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


And boom goes the dynamite.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 07:24 2

72. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


iPhone FAIL!

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 02:49 4

61. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


It opens fine in Firefox and Dolphin browsers on my RAZR's ICS and in Safari on my GF's iPad3. This is going to be my last post, though - GF is more important than taco.

posted on 05 Aug 2012, 02:32

85. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14229; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Why don't you just post a working link instead?

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 09:28 1

75. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


taco that is not true, I am not signed into my google acct and I can see it....

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 23:55 4

40. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


And this is how you and folks like you see it:

So ludicrous decision = anything in Samsung's favor

Correct decision = anything in Apple's favor.

So whats the point of these posts? They are worthless. Please dont try to come off like you arent one of PA's biggest Apple fanboys.

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 00:14 1

43. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


No, he just loves his iPhone because it is easy to use. :D

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 11:36

81. LionStone (Posts: 753; Member since: 10 Dec 2010)


Enh! Wrong again...Apple "could" NOT because audio recordings are not permissible in court.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 22:54 2

35. whysoserious (Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)


It never cease to amuse me to see how shallow and stupid your comments are and have always been.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories