Judge Koh upset at Samsung for leaking info to the press

47. darac posted on 01 Aug 2012, 05:01 1 1

This is the most bizarre, outrageous, scandalous, pointless, partial, disgusting legal farce ever.

I actually had an f700, it's strikingly obvious as the design ancestor to the galaxy s1 phone.
Also it was the first samsung with capacitive touch screen.

49. darac posted on 01 Aug 2012, 05:06 1 1

Oh and for the cream on top of all.. that judge..she is Korean!
What is she trying to prove? That she is not affected by her origins?

I just hate and loathe everything about this case.

51. BadAssAbe posted on 01 Aug 2012, 05:13 0 1

Man i just wanna say "F# CK Apple"

53. taz89 posted on 01 Aug 2012, 05:29 1 1

Well of course she's livid because all the evidence she's disallowed is relevant and is in Samsung favour... These images prove Samsung were on teak and we're designing rectangular slab phones with a home button before the world even knew the iPhone. This is like me dismissing a witness who saw the crime but wasn't allowed to testify lol... If this isn't proof enough that Apple were not 1st with the slab design they claim then I don't know what is.

56. McLaren posted on 01 Aug 2012, 05:30 0 1

A smartphone is rectangle FACT!!!
Apple unconsciously leaked that it is goin' to make either the 1st circle,triangle,trapezium or rhombus smartphone.
I can't wait to buy one.Mwahahahaha...................................​....................................

57. TerryCrowley posted on 01 Aug 2012, 05:34 5 1

Oh no! Judge Slanty-eyed is upset that something went public that doesn't favor her already Apple-predetermined decision. Someone s**t some more bricks for me.

59. Aeires (unregistered) posted on 01 Aug 2012, 07:10 2 1

But Apple is allowed to bring in their prototype images? I've tried to avoid the bias stance but it's getting harder to not take that path.

Is this an actual law where evidence not allowed in court cannot be sent to the media? The jury is usually under a media blackout so it's not like they'll have the opportunity to review them during the trial. Looks like Koh is just upset because Samsung has valid points with their case that she's trying to ban from being used.

65. piyushkohli97 posted on 01 Aug 2012, 09:25 0 0

People Have Gone M

71. medicci37 posted on 01 Aug 2012, 10:47 2 1

What a B*tch !.....Impartial My A**

74. good2great posted on 01 Aug 2012, 11:01 1 6

you people here have serious problems...

none of you seem to have any education on the judicial system or court proceedings...

all you guys do is ramble... apple sucks, judge is stupid, its not fair, the leak isnt bad, blah blah blah.....

this place is definitely in favor of android readers...

that information should NOT have been leaked, all of the thumbed down comments on this post that are HIDDEN tell you why.

-it could sway the jury
-its a disadvantage because apple cannot prepare to refute those documents
-there's certain procedures that both parties have to follow when submitting evidence. if they refuse meet those requirements then it will not be accepted by the judge.

why can't yall put your emotions and hate about apple to the side and understand that?

i dont want Samsung to lose neither do I want apple. I hope it gets thrown out. but it is interesting to see how each side will prove their position.

75. mas11 posted on 01 Aug 2012, 11:03 2 1

Why shouldn't Samsung be allowed to show their evidence to the world if they can't show it in the courtroom? Get rid of that iDiot and replace her with Posner.

80. downphoenix posted on 01 Aug 2012, 18:37 1 1

Samsung should motion for a new judge to hear the case. Koh is clearly an apple fanboy. Things will not go well for them if she continues to be the judge in this trial.

87. Lwazi_N posted on 02 Aug 2012, 13:37 1 0

This Judge Koh is as biased as crap!