Judge Koh lifts injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1; Samsung could be awarded $2.6 million

11. Birds posted on 02 Oct 2012, 05:10 1

From the front and from a glance all tablets look the same with the exception of the nook tablet. That is a risk that manufacturers make considering brand confussion. And when it comes to tablets, I guess the market can be confusing so samsung and other OEMs jsut need to find an interesting way to tweak their software so Apple doesn't feel threatened, start hot flashing like a crazy old bat with a thousand cats, and goes for the jugular like they clearly proved they were willing to do.

I'm not going to lie, when I looked at that picture I thought I was looking at two iPads until I looked at the bottom of the screen on the Tab.

15. PapaSmurf posted on 02 Oct 2012, 07:46 6

If you mistake the Tab 10.1 for the iPad, you need to get your eyes checked.

16. MartyK posted on 02 Oct 2012, 08:05 11

How do you feel about cars?, TV's, stove, refridgerator?...boxes of cereal?...better yet dogs, cats, birds..you see, sometime there is ONLY ONE way a item can be made!! (SMH)..see below for more listing.

arm, leg, finger, circle, head....etc

14. PhenomFaz posted on 02 Oct 2012, 06:22 4

Koh is a turd!
Samsung should just throw the USD $ 2.6 million in Apple and Koh's face and say "KEEP THE CHANGE!"

20. PAPINYC posted on 02 Oct 2012, 08:46 2

iDiSagree, I think an iNjunction should be placed on judge (lower case on purpose) Koh (ho).

22. PhenomFaz posted on 02 Oct 2012, 09:09 0

iAgree :) That is a good alternative too

• This comment is posted in response to #20 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #20 Hide

21. -box- posted on 02 Oct 2012, 08:49 0

Better late than never, but considering the Tab 10.1's relative obsolecence now I'm not sure what the benefit is, unless making it an introductory budget model against ipad2 or something. Has Android 4.x even been made for it, or is it still stuck on Honeycomb?

6. tedkord posted on 02 Oct 2012, 04:17 3

Personally, I never thought she was an Apple shill. She initially the the case out, but on appeal a higher court ordered her to rethink the decision.

I think she didn't want this case, and made sure it wouldn't be decided in her court, by giving both sides ample grounds for appeal.

19. MartyK posted on 02 Oct 2012, 08:18 1

Tedkord,

She could had easliy ended this whole nightmare in a simple way,

Since she couldn't tell the difference between a Rectangle and a Square item, all she had to do was to take the tablet to any 3rd grade classroom, on the board write Samsung is Rectangle --Apple is Square.

Then allow the students in the classroom help her solve this GREAT mystery

28. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 02 Oct 2012, 13:31 0

LMAOOOOO...

• This comment is posted in response to #19 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #19 Hide

5. Droid_X_Doug posted on 02 Oct 2012, 04:01 7

Perhaps blind people should form the jury pool for cases involving design patents?