x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






It's not stealing when Apple does it, because it wasn't stealing when Google did it either

0. phoneArena 13 Jun 2013, 16:17 posted on

Every time there are new features announced for iOS, there is an uproar around the web about Apple "stealing" features. I have talked before about why I think this is a silly argument, but I wanted to put up a refresher on the idea, because the claims simply won't die out. Here's the simple reason: it's not stealing when Apple does it, because it wasn't stealing when Google did it either...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:33 1

95. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


That was also under Steve Jobs years ago. If you're gonna hate a company, find a more recent example.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:38

100. MartyK (Posts: 845; Member since: 11 Apr 2012)


But if Tim want to end/drop the lawsuit he CAN, right?

posted on 14 Jun 2013, 10:36

211. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


We have no idea whether or not Tim Cook can stop the lawsuits. It's not just his decision anymore, because Samsung would have to agree to stop as well, and since Samsung has been winning more recently I don't know how likely that would be.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:50 2

108. Googler (Posts: 813; Member since: 10 Jun 2013)


Recent as in the case is going to be retried a second time, even after both sides were told to work it out? Tim is proceeding with the case, it's still recent.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 19:07

116. Stuntman (Posts: 836; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


I would like for both parties to work it out as well. As much as I would like to see the law suit dropped, I doubt that will happen. By the time this gets settled, I will probably upgrade my SGS3 to something else.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 19:40

128. Googler (Posts: 813; Member since: 10 Jun 2013)


I would too, as well as all other generic lawsuits negatively impacting the mobile world. Unfortunately because Apple was so draconian in forcing bans, I don't see Samsung forgiving them and coming to mutual terms any time soon.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 22:04

161. timcooked (Posts: 5; Member since: 13 Jun 2013)


Because we copied people, yes we admitted.

posted on 14 Jun 2013, 04:17

199. tedkord (Posts: 12205; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Neonode had slide to unlock before Apple. And, if Apple wanted to defend their interpretation of slide to unlock, thats fine. But Apple doesn't roll like that, so in court they claimed that a tap is just a zero length slide, so tapping a button to unlock infringed their patent. Apple believes it owns the concept of unlocking a phone.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:40 1

16. dmakun (Posts: 321; Member since: 06 Jun 2011)


Nice article Michael. I still have to frown at Apple though because they took the moral high ground by litigating competition who like them built upon existing technology. One thing I'm glad about is that they (apple) are now clearly following android and learning a few new tricks along the way.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:42 8

18. turk_az (Posts: 42; Member since: 11 May 2012)


why didn't you write an article like this one when apple was suing everybody for copying and stealing ?
is it alright when apple dose that?

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:53

26. maxican16 (Posts: 364; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)


This.

Actually he may have. But the lawsuits make apple unbearable. So I hope everyone calls them out for stealing because of it.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:57 7

32. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


I didn't work here back then.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:19 2

88. Stuntman (Posts: 836; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


Better late than never. I guess I was out of line when I criticised you for not publishing your other article when Apple was suing everyone. My apologies.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:43 1

20. TruPatriot (Posts: 110; Member since: 27 May 2013)


The thing isn't that they do it, it's that Apple is a hypocrite. They sue an entity and then turn around and do the same thing they just sued for.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:57 2

33. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


When was the last time Apple sued a company that wasn't already suing them?

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 17:20 2

54. ZeroCide (Posts: 777; Member since: 09 Jan 2013)


As it goes Apple sues, company counter sues.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 17:43

69. MCrapp (Posts: 318; Member since: 07 Apr 2013)


http://thenextweb.com/?s=A.pl
A.pl........Yes I know that funny!!!!!!! Even more funny than the rectangle!

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 17:56 3

72. saffant (Posts: 274; Member since: 04 Jul 2011)


Uhh.. Samsung? Apple sued first.

Also, the difference lies in the fact that Apple copies ideas (like most companies), but then they try to patent it, and then claim it as "innovation". I don't see you mentioning that point. Also, that analog amplifier picture doesn't compare cuz its UI is not a touchscreen.

Apple also copies DIRECTLY from their competitor which is really just sad.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:35

96. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Yes, Apple sued Samsung first, and that was two years ago while Steve Jobs was still in charge.

Are there ways to do notifications or quick settings better? We're so early in the smartphone world, that there's no such thing as copying, companies are simply figuring out the best way to do things. There are limited design options with the hardware available today.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:43

21. techaman (unregistered)


the problem is they take the same idea from everyone else that's already deleted see if there's sooo everyone else don't give any credit to anybodyI know most of the stuff came from whether last phone because I had a palm and previous phone before that and I love those phones nobody ever recognize is where all these things come from but you cannot compare computers and filing cabinets to a cell phone

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:58 4

34. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


And Google and Microsoft always give credit, right?

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:24

90. Stuntman (Posts: 836; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


I don't expect any company to come out and announce new features and then say whom they stole it from. The presentation was targeted at current and potentially new Apple users. To these people, these features are new and will be available if they have or buy Apple products. People who won't buy Apple products will not be swayed if Apple starts giving credit to other products whose features they incorporate in their own products.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:44 1

22. Technobri (Posts: 84; Member since: 10 Dec 2012)


Apple had no choice but to do this in order to stay in the game.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:45 1

23. nicholassss (Posts: 368; Member since: 10 May 2012)


its less what they present and more how they present it and also how iOS users interoperate what they present.

Apple presents a feature new to iOS and users tout its as being brand new to the world.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:58 4

35. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Not really. Apple presents features as being new to its users, which they are.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:04 1

79. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


actually id say android users are the first with the ''innovation'' line to mock iOS users

all im taking from this article is everything is inspired by something else and built upon. just when apple do it too many start the childish crap when google do it there praised......double standards

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 18:26 1

91. Stuntman (Posts: 836; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


Yes, it is childish, and many Android users will use the "Jobs started it first" argument.

posted on 14 Jun 2013, 04:22 2

200. tedkord (Posts: 12205; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Actually, when Apple does it, rabid Apple fans claim they innovated it. I have seen people right on this site claim there were no tablets before the iPad. They've insisted Apple invented multitouch. That no phone had a grid of icons before the iPhone.

And the other difference is, when Apple borrows, they try to patent what they borrowed and exclude others from using anything even remotely similar.

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:50 1

25. daymler (Posts: 12; Member since: 09 May 2012)


the first review from phone arena about ios7 was all about how the ios7 is nothing new, about the childish colours and about the lack of innovation. and when i saw the review i was like "finally a true review without stuff like - ios is s*itty but so do android so we cant judge " - guess what people - we can judge !! and without the advertising iphone is nothing (the most recent iphone is with DUAL CORE CHIP?!) because the advertising of iphone is all about how the phone is making your life better and people that have more money than sense think that it will make them happier?!. and since the first ios7 review all the following articles about the os form phone arena are all about how ios7 is good like android 4+ (w*f?!) and its soooo funny how thay are trying to convince us how ios7 is not so bad...its bad...its very bad...its like os for dumb people...no for average customers - for stupid customers!! because there is nothing hard to understand or confusing in android 4+ !! and last but not least ios 7 vs android 4 - 7 ios versions and nothing new except a new look (w*f?!) vs. 4 android versions (only 3 for smartphones) and innovations, new designs and more and more with every release !!

posted on 13 Jun 2013, 16:59 1

36. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2705; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Wow, good to see you have an objective opinion...

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories