It's Samsung's fault that Judge Koh can't lift the ban on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
0. phoneArena posted on 19 Sep 2012, 15:57
The impact of Apple's recent win over Samsung on various patent and trade dress charges have still yet to be completely sorted out, including the fact that Samsung is still unable to sell its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet, even though that was the one win Samsung had in the case...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. hung2900 posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:08 22 0
I skipped reading when I saw "Source: Judge Koh".
2. MichaelHeller posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:26 8 11
Do you always read from the bottom up? That may be a form of dyslexia...
5. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:32 4 3
or jus realizing whats bull crap and what isnt......
6. PapaSmurf posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:50 12 4
Michael, that comment was a little offensive and unprofessional... I'm sure many people check the source of the article first before reading.
12. ardent1 posted on 19 Sep 2012, 18:02 2 1
This is phonearena.com, where insensitive people and bigots troll. As we say at the office, it's par for the course.
15. Aeires (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2012, 18:40 1 0
Like you've never done that before.
/s
17. MichaelHeller posted on 19 Sep 2012, 21:02 4 1
Really? No sense of humor at all?
18. stealthd posted on 19 Sep 2012, 21:15 1 1
No one in the comments has a sense of humor unless Apple is being mocked.
19. PAPINYC (limited) posted on 19 Sep 2012, 21:22 1 0
Don't worry Michael, i'M behind you 110%, even though I might get banned again. I always (well, iTry to) read the article; iOnly lose interest when the iSource is Apple (which is usually the case, especially this past week).
Godspeed
7. PapaSmurf posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:54 4 4
And you shouldn't even comment when you can't even read the mistakes you've made in the article...
20. MichaelHeller posted on 19 Sep 2012, 23:30 0 0
If I've made a mistake, please let me know and I'll correct it.
3. downphoenix posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:26 1 0
Well there was nothing after that part, other than "via ars technica", so a good place to stop.
4. andro. posted on 19 Sep 2012, 16:29 3 1
Funny to see typos,at first at a quick glance I saw "faultt hat" in the title,a strange hat
8. Slammer posted on 19 Sep 2012, 17:02 1 4
I don't usually ever thumb down anyone because I feel no matter how much I may disagree with someone, they still have a right to their own opinion.
However, I am taken back by the fact that someone thumb downed Michael for pointing out an obvious architectural reading malfunction.
John B.
9. TheRetroReplay posted on 19 Sep 2012, 17:31 1 0
Why does it matter if the ban on that gets lifted or not? It's been replaced with the Galaxy Note 10.1 and the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1
11. downphoenix posted on 19 Sep 2012, 17:41 1 0
so that samsung and retailers can offload remaining inventory instead of having it sit in some warehouse somewhere.
10. rusticguy posted on 19 Sep 2012, 17:33 2 0
Apple's getting lot of juice out of Juciy Dough oops Juicy Koh :)
13. ardent1 posted on 19 Sep 2012, 18:05 1 0
Recall Samsung attorneys lost the landmark case -- even one their attorneys didn't have the proper license when the trial started. So is ANYONE surprised by this situation.
14. InspectorGadget80 posted on 19 Sep 2012, 18:34 3 0
That title should be change and so does the judge
16. chemhaz posted on 19 Sep 2012, 20:38 2 0
Get Judge Judy to sort this out and then put Samsung and Apple before her to sort out their differences in a 22 minute episode.
....... I would subscribe to pay TV to watch that episode






