Is T-Mobile's Project Black a $50 unlimited voice and data plan?
Share:
This article contains unofficial information.
RIM BlackBerry Bold2 9700 Preliminary Specifications
Nokia N900 Specifications | Hands-on
source: BGR
Share:
17 Comments
2. ddripp posted on 10 Oct 2009, 21:10 0 0
Thank you Metro Pcs a.k.a the GAME CHANGER. Without you, Tmo wouldn't be talking about " EVERYTHING UNLiMITED" plan. WHOA!
3. brikz4real posted on 10 Oct 2009, 21:39 0 0
.... Now, if they could only improve their coverage.
4. MrRihannaFenty posted on 10 Oct 2009, 21:52 0 0
I hope this is true. Cause if so, I will be so ecstatic to pay $50 a month and have my motorla cliq. UGH please be true
5. WnnaFghtAboutIt posted on 10 Oct 2009, 22:04 0 0
people i talk to daily talk about how they can get their plans cheaper but they stay with verizon for the coverage....while it will attract some, theres plenty that stay for a reason
7. greathero1 posted on 11 Oct 2009, 13:33 0 0
Well considering how high T Mobile ranked in JD Power with respect to coverage, this should attract many more customers. VZ uses the same data that they tout as being the best and T Mobile has for many quarters in the past has performed just as well as Verizon in coverage and customer service. VZ is great for rural areas which it reigns supreme but if you do not spend time in rural areas like myself and never plan on going, then T Mobile works well and have 3g coverage in most major cities that I frequent. In this case, you get what you pay for really does not apply. JD Power has T Mobile ranked just as high as VZ so I will believe their study over the VZ testmen.
9. stuntz posted on 11 Oct 2009, 16:20 0 0
are you sure they've rated the same for coverage nation wide? Link to this?
14. Kiltlifter posted on 11 Oct 2009, 18:18 0 0
And when you do go to a rual area, most will call T-Mo customer service and whine and complain like a little baby about how "my service doesn't work... WHY AM I PAYING YOU SO... ummm... little? Why don't I get what I pay for... oh wait, I do, no rural coverage." So as long as you say that you won't complain about crappy service at a good price, then I am completely behind you for wanting a 50.00 unlimited plan.
15. majicc07 posted on 11 Oct 2009, 19:52 0 0
I so agree with you. When your network has about 50 million less customers than Att and Verizon as well as customers who usually only talk and text and barely use data then for sure their network can handle what they have. Add about 20 million people who actually use the network for more than talk and see how fast it shuts down. Nothing against T Mobile but until they start to even come close to network capacity as the top 2 they should not even be included in the performance tests..
10. moss500a (unregistered) posted on 11 Oct 2009, 17:02 0 0
ok sounds good but if they could only improve their hand sets
11. theman414 posted on 11 Oct 2009, 17:24 0 0
This is great if true. Competition is always a good thing for the consumer.
12. jeffcrawford84 posted on 11 Oct 2009, 17:58 0 0
I really hope this is true. If they can pull this off their customer base will sky rocket! Goodbye, Boost Mobile! (and they were just getting started) Now if T-Mobile could just complete their potential merge with UK carrier, Orange, their coverage would also sky rocket. Lookout, Big Red and Big Blue!
13. Kiltlifter posted on 11 Oct 2009, 18:14 0 0
I don't think T-Mo has the network capacity for something like this. It would be like the Boost Mobile all over again, text taking 5 days to be delivered, data speeds like 14.4 modem speeds... it'll be game changing alright.....
16. moss500a (unregistered) posted on 11 Oct 2009, 20:37 0 0
t-mobile SUCKS anyways. just like metro piece of s*it
17. fmlive posted on 15 Oct 2009, 04:56 0 0
$50 unlimited plan now you say but only if they have good phones....like wat the hell...just stick to using a home phone
