Instagram's new ToS allows Facebook to profit from your pictures forever and ever
0. phoneArena posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:02
How would you feel seeing one of your Instagram pictures on a giant billboard, knowing that Facebook is reaping the benefit of financial benefits from your artistic vision?; Instagram's new Terms of Service give it the rights to license your pictures forever and ever and ever unless you delete your Instagram account before January 16th...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. e.wvu (unregistered) posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:09 2
Maybe if I take a picture of my middle finger they would hopefully use it in an ad. But in serious note, I think this is ridicolous, but it's not gonna make me delete my account.
3. downphoenix posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:46 0
anyone know if this also applies to pictures up on facebook? Just need to know if I need to only delete my Instagram, or delete both.
7. the_best (limited) posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:51 2
i dont know if they can sell your content on facebook, but the contract wich you sign when gettin a FB page clearly states that they own everything you post there.
4. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:48 2
"Facebook writes that "a business or other entity may pay us to display your... photos... in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you."
are they serious? does facebook or should i say Mark Zuckerberg (billionare) really need the money? Sounds extremely selfish to me....smh
9. NexusKoolaid posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:17 1
Facebook IPO'd just south of $40. It's currently just south of $30. The investors want their investment money back, and they'll gladly squeeze your personal data to do it.
10. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:31 0
still selfish......and sounds a bit panicky or something like someone wont eat if they dont get their money! sigh.......lets just see how this turns out
14. johnnh posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:40 0
really mark is just the creator, now facebook is an entity of shareholders, so do not blame someone like he has the keys to stop everything. If you had an investment on facebook you wouldn't be so childish. Welcome to capitalism, nothing is for free. There's a fee for everything aside human thoughts and feelings.
15. the_best (limited) posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:47 1
well thats what we post on facebook and instagram, our thoughts and feelings.. so i guess thats got a pricetag to..
16. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:55 0
sorry dude while thats all true and all it still seems like their just panicing over nothing.........like facebook wont be popular anymore if they dont do this......fear can cause you to lose more than you will ever gain remember that.........
5. the_best (limited) posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:49 5
holy s**t! where is my freedom? i thought the internet should set us free, not lock us in a cellar and throw away the key.
11. caseball2051 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:35 0
signing up for these sites are optional, you can express your freedom by not usign them!
but youre right this is absolutely stupid. i hope they suffer from this decision.
23. JeffdaBeat posted on 18 Dec 2012, 17:56 1
That didn't happen when Google+ released...why would it happen because of this? People will complain and then get over it.
8. SavageLucy42 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:05 0
People are flipping out but if Facebook really thinks using some photo of a doll I tortured or a snapshot of my mom and grandma is going to bring in the users, have at it. These are snapshots for fun. The things I upload to Instagram are not art. (I have an actual camera camera for taking Etsy listing photos.)
12. caseball2051 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:37 1
youre missing the point.
if they wanted to take a picture of your mom and grandma and sell it for profit (which youll see 0% of the money) to a nursing home to use on a brochure they can.
13. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:40 0
exactly......but the thing is............why are they so damn concerend about money........i mean i know its "money" and all but there should be a more reasonable and "honest" cause for doing somthing like this...........seems like there just saying "we're going to use YOU to get paid!"
19. caseball2051 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:09 0
theyre concerned about money because theyre a business and thats waht businesses concern themselves with...lol
you dont go into business to break even. the stock isnt doing as well as tehy expected and now they need to satisfy their holders.
21. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:15 0
dude ive heard it all before........and while what you're saying may be a "fact" GREED wont get you any further than what you are now......accept that or not but watch as they fall if they continue to thrive off of that motive alone...
17. SavageLucy42 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:00 0
My point was that these are s**tty photos that I can't imagine them using.
18. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:07 0
shitty or not their still gonna have to come up with a better reason than just wanting to flat out use us for their benefit...
20. caseball2051 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:12 0
i just gave you a perfectly valid scenario where your pictures would be used.
if you dont care about others profitting from your property more power to you, but this will make them lose some members
26. SavageLucy42 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 18:45 0
Why would anyone use Instagram/Facebook photos as stock photography when there are many really great, professionally shot, extremely cheap/affordable stock photo websites already established?
30. caseball2051 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 21:21 0
who gets paid more?
strangers that get paid 0$, or models who get paid real money?
its simple economics. cmon
34. quakan posted on 19 Dec 2012, 01:37 0
Then don't virtually hand them your pictures if you don't want them to have a copy. Simple as that.
22. BREvenson posted on 18 Dec 2012, 17:19 1
I don't really use Instagram as much as I hoped I would when I first downloaded it. Now, I really have no desire to ever use it again.
Though the chances of them using any pictures I may take are slim to none, I still feel better knowing that I am not contributing to the new agenda.
25. SavageLucy42 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 18:38 0
If you're really concerned that a real pet food company would pay money to utilize a grainy orange tinted photo of your dog, why not just watermark your photos? Better yet realize that there are stock photos out there that are extremely cheap and professionally shot.
31. caseball2051 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 21:22 0
youre still wrong.
if youre ok with people captalizing on your photographs stay a member of instagram. if you dont want people using your image and making money on your photos dont join.
27. BomberXL posted on 18 Dec 2012, 18:52 0
This is Disgusting, how is this even allowed... i mean i heard some people who dont use instgram say " its not a big deal" well, whats stopping Facebook to do the same thing, and how would you feel then? I never signed up for that. Im sure if that was the policy from the start, they wouldent get to big a largely used app
29. Rayvelynn posted on 18 Dec 2012, 19:00 0
never mind I found out how to do it I'm going on the Streamzoo app forget Instagram
32. BomberXL posted on 18 Dec 2012, 23:54 0
actualy after looking up what they have to say, it doesnt seem that this article is true at all.
" Nothing has changed about the control you have over who can see your photos. If you set your photos to private, Instagram only shares your photos with the people you’ve approved to follow you. We hope that this simple control makes it easy for everyone to decide what level of privacy makes sense."
although they will still probably advertise, on IG