x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Instagram for Android uncovers the ugly class war between iOS and Android

Instagram for Android uncovers the ugly class war between iOS and Android

Posted: , by Michael H.

Tags:

Instagram for Android uncovers the ugly class war between iOS and Android
We have written a number of times about the absurdity of the fanboy wars and the absolute viciousness with which people attack each other over something as trivial as that person's choice in mobile phone. It is and forever will be nothing more than a choice. Some people prefer Apple, some prefer Android, some even prefer bada or Windows Phone or even BlackBerry, yet because someone's personal preference is different than yours, apparently that means everyone has free reign to slander, degrade, and mock. We think it is appalling, but no matter what, it will continue happening right below our words, in the comment threads, because as far as fanboys are concerned, there is no option for civility, objectivity, and rational discourse on the Internet. It is disgusting, but never more so than with the introduction of Instagram on Android. 

Instagram for Android uncovers the ugly class war between iOS and Android
Instagram made its debut on Android just two days ago, and as of yesterday it had already shot into the 1 million to 5 million download bracket in the Google Play Store. It was always expected that Instagram would be a hit on Android just as it had been on iOS, but this was a huge launch. There had been no real warning, no announcement, just a sign-up page that never ended up doing anything, and the app was dropped into the Play Store on a Tuesday morning. There were those who didn't care all that much, because of the alternatives already available on the platform, but in general, users were pretty pumped for the release... Android users that is. 

Following the release on Android, Twitter exploded with anti-Android sentiment. Whether genuine or fueled by silly hipsterism, the messages relayed the same idea: Instagram was going to be ruined by all of the poor people who own Android phones. There have been hundreds, if not thousands of messages saying things like "Instagram on Android... ew..." or this gem by @TheBoy_Prince saying, "Instagram on Android is mad dirty it used to be special now it's just gross". There are plenty more, but we have no interest in supporting them by linking or reposting them here.

We have all seen the various studies that claim that the average iPhone user is more wealthy, educated, well-traveled et cetera, et cetera, while Android users tend to be poorer. Of course, this is to be expected given that until the launch of the iPhone 4S, there was no "free" iPhone. This lower-end market is the exact reason why Android was able to eclipse Apple as far as overall market share so quickly. Add that to the general perception that Apple products are for rich people, because of the overall higher cost across devices, and we can certainly understand where the sentiment gained its roots, but that doesn't make it any more acceptable to stereotype an entire group.  

The way we see it, technology is the great equalizer of the world. Yes, there is always a delay in new technology making its way from the more affluent early-adopters to the masses, but once that happens, everyone is put on more equal footing. At first, the Internet was relegated to a small segment of society, and now everyone in the world can find their way to the web, and many do so with mobile devices as their primary connection. The Internet is booming in Asia, Africa and South America because mobile reduces the barrier to entry. This means we truly are living in a more globally connected world, free to share anything from knowledge to pictures with various filters put on them. 

Instagram for Android uncovers the ugly class war between iOS and Android
And, that's really the most annoying part about this. What makes Instagram so special that it will be sullied by the arrival of Android users? We commend the Instagram developers for cultivating such a fervent following, but the reality is that it's nothing more than a camera app with some filters that relied very heavily on existing social networks to build its own. Obviously, the app is doing something right given that it has somewhere north of 30 million iOS users, and now somewhere from 1 to 5 million Android users. Of course, Instagram is also seeing a general pushback from Facebook users whose feeds are being overwhelmed with Instagram pictures. 

The two main successes of Instagram are:
  1. Auto-sharing to social networks, Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr (with Flickr coming soon), and
  2. Filters

The auto-sharing, as we've just mentioned, is something of a double-edged sword. It has helped to grow the network by getting the pictures tons of link juice via Facebook and Twitter, but the pictures are beginning to get tiresome. And that, is directly because of Instagram's #2 success: the filters. Filters are a genius idea because they make everyone think that they are an amazing photographer, and that their pictures are somehow far more interesting because it looks like it has been laying in a shoebox for the past 40 years. The truth is that an interesting picture is what makes an interesting picture, not a slight sepia tone slapped on to another picture of your dinner or your pet. 

Instagram for Android uncovers the ugly class war between iOS and Android
The ultimate failure of Instagram can be easily seen just by flipping between your follower feed and the popular feed in the app. The popular feed for the most part is made up of the truly interesting pictures with good composition, intelligent use of filters, and interesting subjects. Your follower feed, and by extension Facebook and Twitter, are filled with the same boring pictures people always take, but now they think you'll love them and find the photographer to be so much more artsy, because they added on the "toaster" filter. 

We can't really imagine what exactly will be ruined by the addition of Android users to Instagram, but of course there's no logic in bigotry. It's just blind, intolerant, and brings us all down. Fanboys of all camps can be a nasty bunch, but sometimes, as in this case, there is a much more pervasive evil among more casual users of certain platforms. The perception seems to be that Apple users are rich elitists, and Android users are essentially poor, unkempt hobos. It saddens us enough about the state of Internet discourse and web culture to have to try to do our jobs objectively with the molten hate spewed by fanboys and trolls alike (sometimes there isn't much difference between the two), but the responses that are still flowing on Twitter about Instagram is something that makes us sad about humanity in general. 

sources: Buzzfeed & laist

260 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 05 Apr 2012, 16:55 15

1. andro. (Posts: 1936; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


The comments appearing here should be interesting!

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:45 5

29. eyephone (banned) (Posts: 69; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


Poor Fans getting Reds!

posted on 07 Apr 2012, 10:10

250. EriKzAndroid (Posts: 1; Member since: 07 Apr 2012)


Eyephone, cute...Let me guess you think your part of the illuminati? Guess what you're not, at best your a 3rd° F.M. and I doubt you even are a traveling man, and if you're claiming to be so, I am pulling your card...tell me brother where do you hail from? Don't try to be a part of something in which you have not a clue about. One last thing why don't you take down that avitar of the unspoken ones eye or I might have to show you a lesson or two in the square about what life is really about. Also I am quite wealthy although wait what kind of phone do I have, oh yes a Motorola Droid II GLOBAL in White. So this all of the sudden makes me a hunter/gatherer?

posted on 07 Apr 2012, 11:48 1

251. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)


Its spelled avatar. ;)

posted on 08 Apr 2012, 15:01

255. AllEyezOnMe (Posts: 4; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)


Plz just stfu

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:13 7

83. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


I never knew what Instragram was until I saw this post on another site a few days ago.

I still dont know what it is...

I agree its sad some ppl actually think like that. And dont care who knows...some comments are connected to real names. And real pics.

Some ppl take Android vs. iOS THAT serious? I should know....I've seen some of the comments on here

posted on 06 Apr 2012, 00:27

194. KIANO (Posts: 67; Member since: 13 Feb 2011)


Visit Instagram website to learn about it.

posted on 06 Apr 2012, 02:09

196. thinking (Posts: 130; Member since: 19 Jan 2012)


Same here. And interestingly, all these sites hyping Instagram don't care to say what it is. yes, I can search and find out but I think the first time a site reports it, it should mention what it is.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 16:59 12

2. Tmachaveli (Posts: 425; Member since: 01 Apr 2011)


That was well said its really a shame that other are ppl like that in the world

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:00 16

3. jamvts (Posts: 14; Member since: 27 Jan 2012)


haha Nonsense and immature reaction by ios fanboys .... think about it more than half of the Olympic players comes from small town ...... and the wealthy guys don't have guts to match them same in this situation. so that means they are inferior? :rolf:

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:26 22

17. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


I don't think that's fair. I'm a big Apple Fanboy, but I wouldn't come close to saying those things.

Instagram is a hipster app in and of itself. Same goes with Path. These apps are small communities of people sharing their lives with each other. Hell, even I love the fact that Instagram isn't this big popular thing because there is less "noise" than Facebook. Now that it's been opened up to a much larger audience than just iOS, there will be more noise.

But people shouldn't assume that Android users are poor or have ruined Instagram. iOS users can take some pretty terrible photos as well. It's just now, you've got a larger audience that will take crappy pictures...the ratio is the same...but because the number is higher, the crappy picture count raises as well. Still, we have to get past this poor/rich crap. Having less money than someone else doesn't mean that you will automatically take crappy pictures. I'm from Detroit and a good portion of the time, I was taking photos of urban decay. Some of my favorite pictures.

Take good pictures...that's it.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:38 16

25. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


exactly.

unfortunately Jeff u are one of the small handful© resident iOS fanboys that has real intelligence. you are the minority of your group. the majority Is made up of loud,crass, ignorant posters that say exactly what this article is talking about. that's why i wish u would post more. lol

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:43 6

27. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


That's a very odd comment for you to make. You're the poster boy for a fandroid, full of blind android rage.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:46 9

31. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


coming from you ill take that as a compliment .. care to back that up with fact since I defend and rip all OSs and manufacturers when appropriate?

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:49 6

34. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


btw quit thumbing your self up.. its sad.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:52 7

64. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


You can't thumb yourself up or down anymore...

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:21 5

88. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


yes you can. I can do it on my tablet and PC if I wanted tpo maybe it's flash enabled? lol

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:40 4

158. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


wow, i could when you said that, but now i cant. interesting.. very very interesting. :) BOUT DARN TIME!

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:55 6

67. andro. (Posts: 1936; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


Looks like tacos many log in alias have all thumbed you down!!!

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:52 9

37. snowgator (Posts: 3197; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


I would take a remixfa criticism over a ton of other posters blind compliments.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:09 3

46. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


If you think remix is an objective poster that's a negative tick on you.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:11 4

82. greathero1 (Posts: 459; Member since: 13 Jun 2008)


No it's more than a small handful. The majority of iOS users including myself could give a rats ass about who's poor or rich and what photos users are posting. You want to take the behavior of a few and try to portray the entire base as idiots like those commenters which is wrong. From observing this forum,mi can tell you that there are just as many android idiots as there are iOS idiots. Too many times over, these fanboys take this crap too seriously.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 20:24 6

116. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


sorry GH, but the majority of iOS users with brains are not the biggest posters on this board. The loud minority then ruins it for the silent majority. I didnt say no iOS users had brains, because thats completely untrue.. but the vast majority of posts on PA by iOS fans are by the local nutjubs like taco. Android definitely has its crazed fans as well, but since there seems to be more "android" posters these days it tends to keep the fringe from looking like the norm.. unlike the "iOS" side, where the fringe is the loud majority.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:57 4

108. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


Remix stereotyping iOS users and being a hypocrite as usual

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 20:25 7

117. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


and again, this article was aimed directly at you taco. look your internet famous for being a troll. arent you excited?

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 20:28 5

118. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2657; Member since: 26 May 2011)


remix, you gotta cool it. in your very first comment on this post, you called Apple users "chalupas". you lost your standing in this conversation.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:10 2

134. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


no, i didnt michael. I didnt call apple users chalupas, i said there were a few "chalupas" that used the exact terminology that you argued against in the article.

And what is a chalupa? Its a Mexican food... well, at least according to taco bell. know anyone on this board that uses such terminology and is named after a Mexican food? It was a sly way of pointing out that person without calling him out. I figured people would have made the connection. Guess I'll have to be more direct, lol.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:04 11

4. jamvts (Posts: 14; Member since: 27 Jan 2012)


see 2 dislikes to all the 3 posts means 2 ios fanboys actually looking and it and getting angry

free advice go to school and learn something.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:38 12

24. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


Again...I'm an Apple Fanboy and my comment above got two thumbs down. A lot of the popular topics have been seeing this consistantly in the past few days.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:47 4

32. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


I've given u 2 green thumbs so far. :)

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:54 2

39. LoneShaolin (Posts: 307; Member since: 14 Jan 2012)


That's the direction PA is turning. Make a smart, intelligent comment, thumbs down. Be an asshat, thumbs up. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:54 6

66. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


No, something is going on. I think there are some users that are going nuts and just thumbing down every single post no matter what is said.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:04 5

74. IPHONE. (Posts: 16; Member since: 03 Apr 2012)


Nope it's not that may be they don't
like these user's.....

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:05 5

5. Tmachaveli (Posts: 425; Member since: 01 Apr 2011)


Wow a thumbs down for that...some ppl need to get a life

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:12 3

12. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)


some people are just blind my friend...and like you said really do need to get a life and not live life around a brand

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:52 4

63. andro. (Posts: 1936; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


Some people thumbs down my comment way up above which said "the comments appearing here should be interesting"

Seems one particular group of fans will thumbs down any comment despite the content!! :-)

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:05 6

6. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


I don't get how that STEREOTYPE still exists.. especially on these boards.. yet we have a few apple loving chalupas that still to this day say such absurdity. iPhones are now free (and going prepaid) and androids have a higher pricetag than the i4s. whatever old stereotypes there were due to pricepoint no longer have any validity ... and haven't for quite some time.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:12 5

11. Tux4g63 (Posts: 115; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)


I wasn't able to find any Android phone that cost more outright than the iphone does. The 64 GB version of the iphone retails for $850...

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:30 7

18. kcombs (Posts: 245; Member since: 15 Dec 2010)


that's because the iPhone is overpriced by Apple. They still make 50% profit on the phone. They don't need to make that much they just do.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:50 3

36. snowgator (Posts: 3197; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


The iPhone is not overpriced, not as long as people are willing to line the street. If you were Apple and was the most valued company in tech, would YOU change?

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:12 4

47. kcombs (Posts: 245; Member since: 15 Dec 2010)


iPhone 4s 16GB is $199 on contract (US)
my galaxy note 16GB is $299 on contract (US), both phones retail for the same it only costs apple $230 to make the phone, so tell me how selling it to people for $699 is not over priced? my galaxy note may cost the same, but they don't sell them to carriers for $699 like apple does. my note costs Samsung about the same to make, so why does apple sell them for more? it's not worth more.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:45 6

60. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


You don't understand capitalism if you think the iPhone is overpriced.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:14 3

84. kcombs (Posts: 245; Member since: 15 Dec 2010)


I'm refering to the post above. It says " was not able to find any android phone that costs more then the 4s 64gb outright" you won't find any android phone for that price because they are not trying to screw carriers.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:09 1

133. -box- (Posts: 3735; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Officially it may cost that much, but it actually costs much less

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:15 3

139. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


the note costs much more to produce than the iphone. Samsung spends billions a year in research to make those screens and chips. Other than the A5 chip in the i4, what new tech is in it that costs a premium? The note comes with a newer, less produced (and nicer) screen, more hardware like LTE and RAM, and Samsung has to pay licencing fees to Google for the Play store and Google apps.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:45 3

30. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


most people dont buy outright .. they buy subsidized and the majority of iPhone 4s sales are the $150-20016gig version. LTE android phones dominate the 250+ contract pricing range. a very large portion of apples total sales comes from the free 3gs and the $50-100 i4. 8/10 of androids top sellers are "high end" and run 150-250. there is no justification for apple fan price snobbery.

look up the original unlocked price tag of the European Samsung note. 800+ if I remember correctly.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:08 3

45. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


The majority of android phones sold are sub $100. Then there's prepaid which Apple doesn't do. Justvbecausevthe price may be listed at $299 doesn't mean that's a sold price. Android has constant fire sales through providers and companies like Amazon.

Any android phone that comes out you only need to wait a couple months to get it at 50% off or more.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 20:28 3

119. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


apple is looking at prepaid and is already doing small regional carriers and discounting phones lower than on the prime carriers to get extra business. A large portion of apple's sales come from a free 3gs and a $50-100 i4. Your argument has no merrit.. as per usual.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:14

138. -box- (Posts: 3735; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


They may be under $100 but that's with a subsidized contact. The carrier buys the phones from the manufacturer, then sells then at an affordable price to the consumer. Most everywhere else on the world phones are sold without contacts at full price. Apple profits ridiculously off their products because they're made cheaply and sold with the largest markups in the industry.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:50 1

35. Gusto (Posts: 28; Member since: 20 Mar 2012)


Try Tag Heuer Racer or Tag Heuer Link.
Their price is "a little" bit more than that...

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:01 3

72. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5555; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


if you paid $850 for an iPhone then not only are you rich you are also stupid and you don't spend very money well. i haven't paid more than $50 out of pocket for any of my phones since my Devour because i scheme and bury the costs by selling the phones i replace. now i'm rocking a Droid Razr.

#DaveRamsey4LIFE

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:27

152. protozeloz (Posts: 5371; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


I've paid 600 for a phone I want D: don't call me stupid :'(

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:33

154. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5555; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


did you sell a phone in compensation? o:

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 22:09

167. protozeloz (Posts: 5371; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


no, mostly give them when I'm done

posted on 06 Apr 2012, 00:36

195. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5555; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


*FAIL stamps* :P

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:48 4

33. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


It's not a stereotype. It's true. Apple users on average are wealthier, better educated and more tech savvy. This has been confirmed by multiple studies.

This is why you're a fanboy. You refuse to accept facts.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 17:56 14

40. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2657; Member since: 26 May 2011)


That's exactly what a stereotype is: taking the perceived "average" and applying it to everyone. Not all stereotypes are negative, but all forms of stereotyping is reductive and troublesome.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 18:13 5

48. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


Stereotyping is common sense. Media brainwashing has made people think its wrong to stereotype.

Having said that you have to be able to understand the difference between the individual and the stereotype. The stereotype doesn't always apply to the individual.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:28 5

92. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2657; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Agreed, stereotyping can be common sense. Many forms of stereotyping is very good and even necessary. I will gladly hold on to the stereotype that all tigers are dangerous, because it may well save my life.

But, that's not the kind of stereotyping we're talking about. Saying that an Apple user is "more likely" to be more wealthy is a dangerous beginning to any argument. Because those kinds of statistics can be easily misleading. I'm quite sure that if you did the same study of iOS and Android, but made sure it was economically parallel, because again, Apple didn't have a cheap/free option until now, the numbers would bear out equality in user salary, education, tech skills, etc.

Just because Android has options for lower economic rungs doesn't mean anything as far as the overall quality of the platform, or even the user base. Just because someone grows up poor doesn't mean they're less intelligent, just that they may not have the same access to education.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 19:00 3

71. andro. (Posts: 1936; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


Unfortunately Michael taco50 could well be one of those people in your article posting the degrading comments on twitter.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories