x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






ITC judge rules that Samsung has infringed on three Apple patents, might lead to product bans

0. phoneArena 25 Oct 2012, 02:24 posted on

Now here is an unpleasant development for Samsung in its patent fight against Apple - an ITC judge ruled that the Koreans are infringing on several patents held by Cupertino...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:26 18

1. ScottSchneider (Posts: 334; Member since: 06 Dec 2011)


F*apple.... o_0

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:01 3

8. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14208; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Sure blame Apple for protecting their property

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:07 16

10. Nocturne (Posts: 24; Member since: 21 May 2012)


Protecting your property is fine.

Trying to stifle innovation isn't.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 05:23

28. Hemlocke (unregistered)


What "innovation" is involved when you are infringing upon the IP of another company! Protecting your IP does the exact opposite of "stifling innovation."you are forced to either pay for doing something a certain way, or you find another way to do it. If it was not protected and it was a good method, companies would just use it for free and skip figuring out a better way to do it.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 08:30 1

36. CDGMobile (Posts: 29; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


You say this as if Samsung isnt already making new products despite these bans and injunctions, its just that Apple keeps a tent in the courtroom and a sleeping bag on deck for every release date that Samsung or other major competition has, how much longer can we look at the news board and see that once again Apple has claimed that someone has stolen their patent (lets not forget they steal patents too) and then those products get banned, then those products are unbanned and the circle of death continues

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 08:49 3

37. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


@Hemlocke: Xerox, the "inspriation" for the original macintosh. LG Prada, various Sony designs, and other generic designs: "inspriation" for iphone. Dieter Rams' designs for Braun: "inspriation" for pretty much everything coming out of apple since jobs' return which continues until now. Mitsubishi and others: "inspiration" for multitouch. Rio & other MP3 players: "inspiration" for ipod. Windows tablets and other tablet designs, as well as the concept of a thin interactive device (like a clipboard or writing pad): "inspiration" for ipad. Apple hasn't come up with anything actually new or innovative in years, if ever. Stop fooling yourself. You're a poison, as is your name.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 13:58

45. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Taco is that you?

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:30 3

18. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


One property was recently declared as stolen so to say ... bounce scroll was it?

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:33 2

20. ScottSchneider (Posts: 334; Member since: 06 Dec 2011)


Some dogs always bark but never bite... The same way Apple's only gonna throw law suits at everyone instead of innovating good products... We are all here for better innovation technology for our tomorrow... Stopping it is like eating pure Bull$h!t...

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:13 7

14. Jelly_Bean (Posts: 109; Member since: 11 Sep 2012)


Do whatever you want to do Apple, King will always be the King.

And you know what, Don't even think that you can come even near to the technology what Samsung and Google has.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 04:51

25. syedzain (Posts: 175; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)


Lol Google is supporting sam**** .. but apple they are doing their own OS.....

U know LG Is making Nexus 2.. and i like i-phones much , but i hate SAM****. Nexus 2 will rock... ( As LG is producing it )

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:29 2

2. mas11 (Posts: 1034; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)


What are the devices in question? Are the the ones from the trial and if so who cares? It's not like any of them are new.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:40

5. MeoCao (unregistered)


GNex, S2 are involved but not S3

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:36 1

22. nicholassss (Posts: 368; Member since: 10 May 2012)


As long as I can get my note 2 :3

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:34 4

3. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


Feb is too long away ... 4 months is a big time in Android world :)
Apple can keep doing this and get nothing out of it except more sales for Samsung ...

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:34 1

21. nicholassss (Posts: 368; Member since: 10 May 2012)


Wrong button. Ment to reply above you. Can you delete? Haha

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:38 8

4. Retro-touch (Posts: 273; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)


What I don't understand is why Samsung are getting a beating only in American courts yet those same law suits go very differently in Asia and Europe?????

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:42 6

6. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


Jingoism prevails over principle of natural justice. Nothing uncomon. What needs to be seen is how many politicians hold huge stocks of Apple ... :)

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:02 1

9. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14208; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Bias and those countries don't believe in fair justice

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:29 4

17. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


Yes America protects culprit of one of the worst Industrial disasters in world. Do you know who? If not go back to school :)

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 04:09 1

23. tedkord (Posts: 12272; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


You just described the American trial perfectly. Throw in retard with an agenda, and you've also nailed the jury foreman.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 13:59

46. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


fair justice in America? Do some research you sound ignorant...

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:24

15. TheRetroReplay (Posts: 254; Member since: 20 Mar 2012)


It's because Apple's patents are so broad that it's really just a matter of opinion if someone is infringing or not.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 08:53

38. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


"Home field advantage", even though apple doesn't pay taxes in the US nor does it have any manufacturing jobs here. Samsung does both.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 10:44 1

43. xtremesv (Posts: 298; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)


The problem within US political system is lobbying, a subtle way to bribe politicians. In the States is acceptable that large companies “donate” big amounts of money to gain political favors. I don’t know but Apple with its endless bank account (almost as big as the US federal government’s) may do wonders. For the record, I’m not accusing anyone, Apple could sue me and they really excel at that.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 14:00

47. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


BINGO!!!!

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 02:48 8

7. Topcat488 (Posts: 1396; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)


Please Samsung, make Apple remove LTE from their products... This patent has nothing to do with FRAND, the iphone5 will run perfectly on 3G networks... Please don't let them off the hook on this one... Thank You in Advance.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 08:54

39. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Oh yeah, I had forgotten about that lawsuit. Disappointed there hasn't been anything more on it

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:08 11

11. Savage (unregistered)


Who cares. Its not as if this is gonna boost Apple sales. As time passes, Apple's new devices are getting lamer and lamer.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 03:09 5

12. rcwfox2002 (Posts: 41; Member since: 20 Dec 2011)


Why is it only U.S. courts that side with Apple just shameful.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories