How does the Lumia 920 camera fare against a $7,000 Canon EOS-1D X DSLR?
0. phoneArena 27 Nov 2012, 16:53 posted on
We have all been effectively “wowed” by the Lumia 920’s camera, especially its low-light performance...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3012; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Here's to a job well done Nokia!!
12. -box- (Posts: 3820; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
That said, why the different shutter speeds (1s vs 2s)? Makes a difference in low light.
30. asseek (Posts: 164; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)
because the longer the shutter speed, the more light is absorbed
shutter speed and aperture (exposure) work in opposite, when SS is high the aperture must be low, and vice versa
2. vakbrain (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Nov 2012)
Comparing DSLR with Smartphone camera is like Comparing a Bugatti Veyron to a Toyota Yaris. Limiting the test to ISO800 is like limiting the Bugatti on the first gear only... Bugatti still wins, but what was the point of this test ?
4. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3012; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Oh, quit yapping and accept the innovation on the phone!!!
Atleast the 920 made it to the 1st gear of a DSLR according to you, while other cameraphones are still in the neutral gear.
It's a phone...and a real camera, no one expects the phone to do better than the DSLR costing 7 grand.
10. vakbrain (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Nov 2012)
The phone looks great. It can do tethering (meaning that it has some router features built-in). Perhaps we should compare this phone to a Cisco 3900 series routers as well.../sarcasm. I'm a photographer and I own Canon gears (bodies and lenses) and people saying that a PHONE can do better than something dedicated to real photography (i.e.: DSLRs) are just igno... Nah this subject doesn't worth it.
14. ahhxd717 (Posts: 318; Member since: 08 Dec 2011)
I don't think the point was to say the Lumia was better, but it can take comparable low light shots which is impressive since its on a phone. Obviously it won't do better than the Canon, but it puts out some high quality photos
24. meowcenary (Posts: 187; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
That is the problem with convergence technology. People think that a all in one device is the best because they are either too lazy to carry around a dedicated device (which is better) or just naive. Comparing a phone camera to a dslr (FX, DX, CMOS, or CCD) with fast glass or hell kit lens is ludicrous. I never use my phone camera, my load out has always been a Nikon with a nifty 50 or a 70-210. My back up is a canon advance point and shoot. Both dslr and advance point and shoot trumps any phone camera. I have control over ISO, WB, exposure, f-stop, and of course a plethora of lens.
32. akishakoi (Posts: 65; Member since: 06 Dec 2011)
Good for you if you carry all those gears all the time. But you don't. That's the point of Nokia creating the Lumia 920, providing you a smartphone that you always carry so that you can take pictures of moments that are "comparable to a DSLR".
38. meowcenary (Posts: 187; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Actually I do, friendo. I care them around in a Lowepro Photo Sport 200 AW. With the nifty 50, 70-210, and canon APS. It does not weigh much, and I am always ready for those moments. *shrugs* Comparable to a dslr is a joke friendo.
39. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)
you carry all that i will carry my 808, bet i can pull my phone out and take a picture before your ready too. see this is a good comparision it shows how far phone camera's have come and how close there getting to dslr's
like said by some one already its not trying to say the 920 is better then a dslr. but if you can get almost similar results for less then a 3rd the price and without the need for other lenses etc its a bargain
7. remixfa (Posts: 13930; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
to show how far cell phone cameras have come... and how far they have yet to go to be a true camera replacement.
the point is for "everyday people", its a damn high quality phone camera
9. MC1123 (Posts: 1242; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
actually comparing them into a DSLR has a point...coz it will show how capable a phone's camera if it have same settings on DSLR...
but still DSLR are the best...but it will only show us that a camera with almost same with DSLR's settings is a very capable one...
and besides, i prefer getting the best camera phone (but im getting 808 PV) than DSLR when i travel and going somewhere coz its handy than the DSLRs! DSLRs are just huge!
25. meowcenary (Posts: 187; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Even if a dslr shoots with the same setting as a phone camera. With dslr I still have control over my WB, exposure, ISO ranges, and I have loads of glasses to chose from. Also the sensor on a phone camera is not comparable to to a CMOS or CCD sensor of a FX or DX camera.
26. MC1123 (Posts: 1242; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
yeah...but still its good to see that a phone can somehow match a DSLR! and its a pricey DSLR!
3. Johnnokia (Posts: 523; Member since: 27 May 2012)
Nokia is really great company and I wish them to comeback to the top.
They really deserve Phone world's crown and we are lucky enjoying their products.
5. nyamo (Posts: 274; Member since: 19 Mar 2011)
coinsidering how many people don't own a DSLR, AND how many people have replaced most point and shoots with cell phones only i think the comparison is justified
6. papss (unregistered)
Agreed but impressive that it does so well.. I love my 920
8. MC1123 (Posts: 1242; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
loving this comparason..but it would be good if they compare it to 808 pureview as well, replace the lumia 900...
11. bluescreen (Posts: 154; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)
well for a roughly 6k savings and even if it was restricted to one setting like an eariler comment said i'd still say thats pretty damn good odds are i wouldnt buy it though
13. sinple (Posts: 106; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)
what the point of lumia 920 if it can only take photo at low light. shouldn't there be more comparison in other Setting? both camera using flash, day light etc. iI think the 808 with xenon flash might be a good fight with the 920. If comparison keeps limiting it to night shot with no flashlight, what's the point
17. redmd (Posts: 896; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
because it's been observed that daylight photos aren't that stellar so that have to market the night shots.
15. phil2n (Posts: 473; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
I can't put DSLR in my pocket, that's why i use lumia for taking pictures.. In terms of phone camera Lumia 920 is the king 2nd to PV 808
18. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)
so if the 920 is the king the 808pv must be god lol
nah it was said on here awhile ago by someone but in my opinion the 920 is iron man its been made to fit all purposes and hasnt left out style. the 808 is the hulk, forget been thin it throws its weight around and demolishes all other cameraphones
think that works
19. gazmatic (Posts: 625; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)
This is like the 808 all over again. I actually heard people say that the iphone camera is better... Talk about deluded. Nokia are renowned for their build quality and camera. Atleast acknowledge that fact. The three best camera phones are nokia. 808 920 n8. Everybody else is fighting for fourth
20. Bernoulli (Posts: 1451; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
Can you guys do a photo comparison with the 808 pureview please?
21. someones4 (Posts: 619; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
Just an honest opinion: The lumia quality would seem better to me when compared with other phone cameras. Compared to the DSLR just makes me feel sad, knowing that every phone camera quality is still inferior.
22. MC1123 (Posts: 1242; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
but it is nice that lumia can be compared to a DSLR...we all know nokia is superior especially in camera, even sony or samsung makes a DSLR or compact camera! but nokia beat them in terms of innovation with camera phone!
i think the one who deserve to be compared here is 808 PV, lumia 920 and this DSLR!
33. someones4 (Posts: 619; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
true that..but it just seems like a waste to get a nokia just for its cam. Granted, the lumia is impressive but I still can't get used to Windows OS.
I really hope that Samsung can out a DSLR quality sensor in its Galaxy phones.
36. MC1123 (Posts: 1242; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
AGAIN..it will be about on people's reference... and windows phone just work ok for me...
23. jsdechavez (Posts: 708; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
Wow.. Massive improvement over the Nokia Lumia 900. The low-light performance do compare with the dslr. If the Lumia 920 was made with the 808 Pureview Pro camera resolution this would have been on par with the dslr.
27. MC1123 (Posts: 1242; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
actually lumia 900's camera was not that good! it was i think a rush product for nokia's event the Nokia world...remember they said before that they dont have much time to design a phone or make improvements..thats why the first WP by nokia ressembles to the N9 (L800 and L900) and C7/701 (710)
and the 2nd batch of lumia, the lumia 920 and 820 is the biggest improvement! and they make more attractive! but still i think the lumia 920 was rush...because, maybe next year, we might see a lumia with 41MP or whatever new innovation of nokia..but still lumia 920 is awesome as it is! it is the next best camera phone in the world!
1.) 808 PV
2.) Lumia 920
28. Shubham412302 (Posts: 298; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)
wait for pureview phase 3 it will push all the limits in smartphone photography
35. steelicon (Posts: 313; Member since: 02 Apr 2011)
Hm. Wait for Windows Phone 7. No, wait for Windows Phone 7.5. Oh sorry, wait for Windows Phone 7.8. Well, we seem to need to wait for Windows Phone 8. Ermmm, sorry again, Windows Phone 9 should do the trick.
Meanwhile, have a bite of PureView Faux because we won't be giving you the PureView Pro anymore.
In fact, we just want you to salivate without giving you satisfaction or the privilege of resolution and closure.
Keep hanging on! Keep Calm and Carry On! (Oh I forgot, Nokia is now mostly an American/Chinese company than Finnish, LOL!)
29. Thephonegeek (Posts: 118; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)
920 has an amazing camera. It's lowlight performence is better than all other smartphones and even Entry level DSLR cameras. But, it's daylight performence is a little bit above average and it's sunlight flare is disappointing.
34. T12RYK (Posts: 98; Member since: 10 Jun 2011)
Nokia truly do have one of the best Cameras in a smartphone and for me its good enough to replace a standard camera (I actually ditched mine when I got an iPhone 4).
Don't get me wrong, its can't compete with a DSLR Camera but lets face it, its hold up really well compared to how small the lens is.
37. GeekMovement (Posts: 1505; Member since: 09 Sep 2011)
Nokia has the best camera in their smartphones, it's really amazing. Their recent device (Lumia 920) felt like a gem in my hands.
But you can't really compare DSLR's to smartphone cameras.