x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Here is the difference video stabilization makes: Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Nokia Lumia 920

0. phoneArena 05 Apr 2013, 09:22 posted on

The Samsung Galaxy S4 is already in the hands of many reviewers across the globe and while it touts a plethora of new features including a 5-inch 1080p display fitting in a compact body...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 12:13 1

96. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1163; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


who the hell is disliking my comments???/
paid or not, just die.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 17:18 5

122. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)


The guy is a dedicated Samsung fanboy, just let him buy his S4 and stop giving him a voice.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 18:30 1

129. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


WTF the 808 is 14MM thick, this isn't 2001!

Who the hell and I've never seen anyone carry or have phones that big and thick. Every company is on slim phones no thicker than 9MM Nokia love there outdated CpuGpu thick phones™

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 18:47

133. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 765; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)


thank u for d answer and d insult ah..
fyi i dont care abt technical tsu tsu of a mobile..,
i just want to know things better..

you voice like u know everything in ds world..

posted on 06 Apr 2013, 12:52

141. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


LOL I knew you Nokia homers would have a problem with it but it's true some things should carry more weight than others and a compact body that fits great in your hand and pockets is much more important to people than OIS when talking about mobile phones.

Let's put it this way. It is called a "mobile" phone not a "giant brick that bulges out in your pocket" camera. That should tell you what is more important in a mobile phone.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 09:34 3

5. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1163; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


cool. a future-proof multimedia device for me.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 09:36 13

7. aryanfr1 (Posts: 125; Member since: 24 Jan 2013)


Nokia really KO Sammy in camera but Sammy KO Nokia in other Specs

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 09:59 2

14. StreetNerd (Posts: 833; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)


XP over specs, thank you!

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 09:59 19

15. zazori08 (Posts: 113; Member since: 21 Dec 2011)


But Nokia KO'd Samsung on design and choice of materials.
PS: They both use plastic I know. But the polycarbonate unibody kicks the hyperglazed plastic of the s4 into space.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:02 7

20. amats69 (Posts: 1477; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)


oh and here comes the sammy thumb downers! lol

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:08 12

22. sniper1087 (Posts: 526; Member since: 31 Dec 2011)


polycarbonate is plastic, and yes the nokia is the strongest phone I have seen and hyperglazed is garbage, prone to fingerprints and scratches easy.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:18 5

26. haseebzahid (Posts: 1853; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


but performance vise all those spces count for nothing more then a grain of sand :P OS performs at same level on both devices so only display is better:P

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:31

35. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 765; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)


gs4 uses polycarbonate dude but yeah ur ryt, sammy shudve make something like htc one x and d lumias, they look more beautiful.. but samsung shudnt use aluminum and glass :)

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 12:21 2

99. akki20892 (Posts: 3902; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


http://www.wpcentral.com/lumia-920-reportedly-survives-getting-crushed-24-ton-caterpillar
Check this then say...sammy fans

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 12:47 2

104. BillyG (Posts: 305; Member since: 24 Sep 2012)


the only stupid move nokia made was choosing WP over android. if 920 were using JellyBean, i bet it can beat SG4 or even later still able to beat SG5.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 15:24

113. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)


Do you know how stupid you sound for saying you would rather have a Nokia than an s4 because the camera is better even though the s4 is better in every other aspect? Get the S4+ a real camera. Don't waste your time with phone cameras there is MUCH better cameras out there that cost less than phones.

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 18:35

130. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Yea with there last years spec, Nokia is more of connecting people. SONY is all about design, Samsung the more powerful hardware, LG is first to kinda innovate, Htc is allrounder™

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 19:52

134. joey_sfb (Posts: 6335; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Even if nokia choose Android i will that not buy their phone due to the lack of SD card and removable battery. Sammy has that and now a will to update their phone software as well.

posted on 07 Apr 2013, 02:06

149. poping (unregistered)


sorry dude, this wont convince me. i work inside an office. i don't work in a construction company.but if i'm a truck driver or a construction worker, i'd buy a cheap phone and make sure it's always with me and not on the pavement....

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:01 2

57. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


the fact you put the note 2 on your list of best camera phones discredits everything you say as the cameras pretty poor, HTC one's camera is better then the notes yet its missing on your err list

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 09:48 18

8. bojan (Posts: 188; Member since: 06 Oct 2012)


s4 camera sucks

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:27 5

32. ebubekir26 (Posts: 329; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


It doens't suck :)
yes stabilization and low light are better on nokia, just because it lost in stabilisation doesn't mean it sucks, maps? Nokia is the best in terms of navigation, my old Nokia N8 has better maps than my Galaxy Note II
but Video and image sharpness and quality is better in Samsung.
if I would write why the S4 is better than 920, this would be the longest comment I wrote,

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:35

41. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 765; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)


sucks for video stabilization (not details) and average in low light..
but for the rest of camera performance, it is one of the best with the ip5, gs3, note2, lumia 920 and the king: PV 808

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 10:39 4

47. wendygarett (unregistered)


Lumia 920 is a obese brick!!!

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:01 6

60. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


obese- probably describes the sad troll behind your account

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:07 1

63. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


the blind camera comparision where the iphone was voted to produce the more attractive and eye catching pics

cant believe some still cling to the ''iphone and samsung won'' bs

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:03 1

61. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 765; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)


coz s3 and note2 have the same camera tsu tsu..,,
sorry for that, im just basing my list from the reviews, esp the blind camera comparison..

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:07 7

64. highonandroid (Posts: 19; Member since: 06 Mar 2013)


yes agreed, S4's camera doesn't suck, but haters are everywere
Nokia Lumia 920 is a great smartphone, but S4 is no doubt better, but don't forget S4 is a new phone, 920 is from last year

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:10 1

66. ebubekir26 (Posts: 329; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


yep, it's from last year but still a great device
i'm not saying it's a bad smartphone at all, I think people see my comments as hate :/

posted on 05 Apr 2013, 11:12 1

67. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 765; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)


dude, i mentioned a list of best mobile cam ryt,, wud u want my list to look like this>

"ip5, iphone 5, ip5, iphone5"

ip5 won that comparison..
gs4 won also but not against ip5, but against other smartphones
lumia 920 won also but against s3, htc one and xperia z..
gs3 won also but against htc one and xperia z.. and so on :)

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories