HTC Vivid benchmark tests
0. phoneArena posted on 04 Nov 2011, 15:28
Moving onto the nitty gritty, our first task at hand was to see what numbers it could pull out running the Quadrant benchmark tests. Unsurprisingly, it boasts scores that are expected, but nothing mind-blowing when you compare them against the competition...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
2. Nikonmorous posted on 04 Nov 2011, 16:00 2
Not really impressive at all. I can score 4905 with my first generation Atrix (un-rooted and everything).
6. JEEPOFFROADV8 posted on 04 Nov 2011, 19:27 1
yeah but that benchmark is with one core. tested my evo3d and it doesnt use the 2nd core yet in benchmarks
3. snowgator posted on 04 Nov 2011, 16:07 0
Expected lower than the GS2. More interested in camera performance and how this monsters screen performance is. It should be fairly seamless in it's real life operations. My Wife wamts a great, huge monster screen and a camera with the best quality. If this doesn't deliver on those two fronts, what does it really offer? The AT&T LTE network will not kick into high gear until next year, and the LTE offerings will come fast and furious soon. The Vivid needs stand out on something more than a near non-existing 4G signal to get some love.
11. ledbetterp3 posted on 04 Nov 2011, 20:52 0
If she wants a big screen and good camera, the sgsII skyrocket should be her choice, but I would rather have this. Oh, and I can name a stand-out feature this phone has: 60 fps 1080p video recording!
5. ph00ny posted on 04 Nov 2011, 19:14 0
Seriously what is wrong with HTC sticking with Qualcomm SoC? It's obviously outclassed by every other dual core offering but they just won't switch over to ti omap
15. toaster posted on 05 Nov 2011, 08:58 0
In terms of real world execution (smoothness and whatnot):
Exynos > OMAP 4430 > NVIDIA Tegra 2 > Snapdragon S3
The older architecture is to blame for this. Watch the T-Mobile GS2 review and compare it to the AT&T version. The AT&T one is much smoother, while the T-Mo version, using the Snapdragon, lags ever so slightly just scrolling around the interface. Touchwiz is by no means a heavy skin either.
I don't think HTC is friendly with Texas Instruments, or not anything like the way they are with Qualcomm. It's a bit odd that Sense is the most graphically taxing skin out of all the OEM, but HTC decides to use the worst SoC.
8. jinwons posted on 04 Nov 2011, 19:31 1
The Sense UI is to blame for this low scores against SGSII skyrocket using the same Qualcomm dual core. Sense is serious resource hog bogging down the performance of phone.
16. toaster posted on 05 Nov 2011, 09:01 0
I thought the interface and everything it would impact is marginalized for benchmark tests to give a (fairly) accurate score. After all a benchmark is supposed to be under optimal conditions.
9. JEEPOFFROADV8 posted on 04 Nov 2011, 19:32 0
ill take a s3 over ti omap any day. ill listen to anandtech before i listen to someone like you
14. bayhuy posted on 05 Nov 2011, 00:29 2
Bla...your SGSII is so fast... I bet you're playing Angry birds in fast motion...
-
HTC Desire 200
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom
-
Samsung GALAXY Ace 3
-
ZTE Vital
-
Nokia EOS
-
LG Optimus L4 II
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
-
Sony Xperia M
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Samsung Galaxy Note II
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Review
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One
-
Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One, Sony Xperia Z, iPhone 5, Nokia Lumia 920 and Galaxy S III
-
Screen Comparison: Galaxy S4 vs iPhone 5 vs Xperia Z vs One vs Galaxy S III vs Lumia 920
