HTC Butterfly is official – international GSM variant of the Droid DNA monsterphone
0. phoneArena 07 Dec 2012, 02:40 posted on
Without much fanfare, HTC just made its Butterfly Android smartphone official, and the device already has its dedicated page on the company's web site. We're looking at a handset nearly identical to the J Butterfly, which was announced for Japan back in October, and the HTC Droid DNA, which Verizon subscribers in the U.S. can already buy...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)
This or the M7....damn Id love a metal based phone with 13 juicy megapixels :\
Oh and is this like the J Bfly with waterproof ?
44. Nadr1212 (Posts: 741; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)
For some bizarre reason i think the HTC droid DNA is better, EVEN though its not international.
48. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1236; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)
add to that an aluminum unibody chassis and for God's sake HTC....a monster battery for a monster phone please!
2. tiara6918 (Posts: 2042; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
Butterfly?! I was expecting for htc to change the name for the international version. But anyways, I can't wait for this beast!
36. wendygarett (unregistered)
But this name suits you, hehehe :p
37. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3899; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
I'd better be seen with this beast than your iPhone.
Sorry, but i don't lie.
46. JC557 (Posts: 1544; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)
HTC should take this time to add another to the DNA/ Butterfly lineup: 32GB+ versions. I can make do with slightly less than 16GB but not everyone.
3. byazatt (Posts: 269; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
water proof is a standard in Japan, I doubt this one is.
29. amiroo (Posts: 269; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
this is watter proof..
butterfly is the best in the rest time.
4. MeoCao (unregistered)
I prefer the hard plastic construction of B J to this matt finish.
7. redmd (Posts: 1273; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
they could have used a wholesome name for the international version.
5. danny_a2005 (Posts: 165; Member since: 06 Oct 2011)
HTC is a company that actually listens... The main difference of this phone and the DNA is that the international version actually has micro sd support.. You should check the specs in the official page of HTC.. Greetings
8. redmd (Posts: 1273; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
actually htc is trying to experiment with non removable battery and non expandable storage. clearly most people don't want that. htc is just being reactive.
23. Mr.Alawi (Posts: 14; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)
no actually verizon is the one that wanted non expanable storage for DNA so don't blame HTC for that ...while HTC butterfly is same as Japanese version which it have expandable storage
9. tiara6918 (Posts: 2042; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
It's a good thing that they're listening now, the only other thing they have to do is to have a removable back cover
20. wendygarett (unregistered)
Lol the HTC j butterfly also has micro sd... Just DNA lack of
43. danny_a2005 (Posts: 165; Member since: 06 Oct 2011)
Look at this... it seems it will have 3 colors..
47. JC557 (Posts: 1544; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)
D'oh... hopefully instead of adding a card slot (supposedly due to carrier pressure) they can release a 32GB model for the US then.
6. thelegend6657 (unregistered)
Cant wait for it to launch in Malaysia .
I am buying one !
Why the HTC One x+ became obsolete so quickly ?
11. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)
OneX+ was mainly for the people who wanted LTE with tegra 3. It wasnt a flagship merely an upgrade like the S3 with dual core krait to S3 with quad exynos + LTE!! Only they made it more appealing by improving the minor things to keep up with current flagships
41. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
Not to mention you could use the X+ battery on the X... Ooooh, I can't wait to do the battery swap...
10. wendygarett (unregistered)
I don't understand the hype of 1080p screen :(
What makes it so special?
12. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)
its almost paper like quality (although i am still yet to see for myself)
and brilliant image reproduction.
14. wendygarett (unregistered)
What I mean is you don't need that much of ppi tho... It might hurts your eyes, too contrast on a very small screen... Not actually can tell the different tho...
17. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)
It wont hurt your eyes :L Why would it?? Why would they even go into production if they found out that such high PPI on a small screen was bad...and on a normal day to day basis on texting? No you wouldnt. But movies, pictures, web browsing ?? HELL YES IT WOULD!
18. wendygarett (unregistered)
oh now i see lol :P
19. ReddD (Posts: 37; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Your logic is flawed there, if the image is clearer then your eyes won't have to work as hard to focus on it. 300 ppi is the max a person with 20/20 vision can distinguish at the usual distance you hold your phone away from your face. I forget the specific figure. however if you have better than 20/20 vision then you can distinguish those pixels or if you happen to be closer to the screen. In one of the reviews I read on it, it mentioned that there is a discernible difference between 300ppi and 440ppi.
26. No_Nonsense (Posts: 826; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)
300ppi is not the max a person can see with 20/20 vision. The figure is 952. Cult of max did a piece on it sometime ago.
13. iDroidWin (Posts: 117; Member since: 07 Dec 2012)
Any idea when it will start shipping and to which countries.