HDR Microphone disappears from HTC One spec sheet following court ruling
0. phoneArena 02 May 2013, 10:21 posted on
HTC has removed the HDR microphone from the HTC One spec sheet after the ruling in an Amsterdam district court that ST Microelectronics sold the dual membrane microphone 6 months before Nokia's 12 months of exclusivity was to end; while the court did not fault HTC (after all, how would HTC know of the deal between Nokia and ST Microelectronics?), once HTC uses up the part, it has to turn to a new source...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3011; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Lucky for those first batch buyers...
But HTC had no choice and it's a good thing Nokia didn't take HTC to battle. A pretty mature move.
3. sharks (Posts: 164; Member since: 16 Feb 2013)
Nokia took HTC to court! How is that not prepping for a legal battle? LOL. But the court was able to settle it quickly as the guilty was not HTC, but the manufacturer, ST Microelectronics!
5. xperiaDROID (Posts: 5404; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Luckily Nokia and HTC didn't start the court battle, and the court was able to settle it quickly and easily! Phew, that was a close one!
If it's Apple and Samsung, things will get even worse, and don't forget, the court battle between Apple and Samsung have not ended yet!
6. chocolaking (Posts: 440; Member since: 22 May 2012)
Awww... that's too bad for the people who is getting the phones later.
lucky I got the first batch version!! :D
14. mafiaprinc3 (Posts: 319; Member since: 07 May 2012)
am i the only one who tinks the back of the htc one is pretty similar to the back of the sony xperia p,just kidding.good phone from htc,could've been better though
2. sharks (Posts: 164; Member since: 16 Feb 2013)
"HTC will transition to improved microphone designs once its inventory of STM microphones is exhausted." Now, that's the part that causes worry. What kind of microphone will HTC use to replace the top-of-the-line one which it has been banned from using? Will it be better or at least as good as the previous one in the initial batch of phones produced? This should be a memo to PhoneArena and any other tech reporters out there - test, review and compare the mic quality of future HTC Ones produced without the Nokia-exclusive mic. Hopefully, HTC can rise up to the challenge or it might lose its precious slight advantage against its nemesis, the S4.
10. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5750; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
What HTC will replace the ST Microelectronics microphone with IS the real question. Since HTC has removed the HDR microphone from the One's spec sheet, I am not exactly encouraged about the prospects for the future.
It really is unfortunate that HTC got burned by Nokia. ST Microelectronics deserved what it got, but HTC is innocent.
4. best_ (Posts: 50; Member since: 08 Apr 2013)
nology-22263014WTF Phonearena !
9. chocolaking (Posts: 440; Member since: 22 May 2012)
PA hates HTC as always, this is Samsung arena!!!!
This website always provide biased and one sideed news. specially to htc, they always provide bad news for the readers.
16. weinerslav (Posts: 126; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)
I wonder where do you see in this article any kind of message of hate against HTC... Maybe you should get some reading classes
20. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3011; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Actually, if you compare to the link 'Best' posted against PA's article...it would come to conclusion that PA is actually supporting HTC.
7. tombcd (Posts: 12; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
This statement from HTC is OLD. Their PR department is probably sending this same answers to every question. It was released when the whole case surfaced.
The fact is: HDR mic is gone from the specs and we want to know what's going on - are current units HDR-enabled or not? What happens when they run out of the HDR mics? How do we know which one we're buying?
8. amats69 (Posts: 1034; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
Hopefully the Mic Replacement is as good as the original one or much better that the original One!
15. best_ (Posts: 50; Member since: 08 Apr 2013)
cant be "original one " because that mic are not from HTC
21. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
It really depend how "original one" is used in conversation.
11. sorcio46 (Posts: 395; Member since: 27 Jul 2011)
Shame on you Nokia (Windows HW division) -.-
12. amansingal14 (Posts: 286; Member since: 08 Sep 2012)
why? because they are protecting their rights? If a person sells your house by counterfeiting, won't you sue him and the buyer to get back your right? What an htc fanboy you are.
23. Altair (Posts: 324; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)
Ahh a guy who likes thieves. Wondering whats your own hobby?
27. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
I'm HTC fan, but I do support Nokia in this one, they have the design, and the agreement. So they HAVE THE RIGHT to do this.
It's a pity HTC can't use the HDR mic anymore, but at least Nokia is nice enough not to have injunction against the One, as they are mature enough to know that HTC used them in good faith with STM. HTC has also made a good decision in removing the HDR mic from spec sheet. They respect Nokia.
And that's how all these should be done.
Kudos to both of them, especially Nokia.
31. joey_sfb (Posts: 2906; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
Nokia did ask for the injunction and got it in the Dutch court.
18. lj200 (Posts: 3; Member since: 15 Mar 2013)
It still shows HDR microphone on their spec sheet under Sound Enhancement.
22. Altair (Posts: 324; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)
Give me a break, who ever believes that HTC didin't know what they bought and who invented it?
HTC - Quietly stealing
28. willard12 (Posts: 783; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Apparently, ST microelectronics invented it as they sold it to HTC. Only in the world of a troll is paying money for a product "stealing." When this limited exclusivity clause of nokia's contract ends, hopefully stupidity will end with it. So, if this is a Nokia product, why didn't they sue HTC for a patent violation? Why didn't they protect a product that's theirs rather than just ask the inventors not "please don't sell it to anyone else but us for a year." Exclusivity clause is not a patent.
29. willard12 (Posts: 783; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Apparently, ST microelectronics invented it as they sold it to HTC. Only in the world of a troll is paying money for a product "stealing." When this limited exclusivity clause of nokia's contract ends, hopefully stupidity will end with it. So, if this is a Nokia product, why didn't they sue HTC for an patent violation? Why didn't they protect a product that's theirs rather than just ask the inventors "please don't sell it to anyone else but us for a year." Exclusivity clause is not a patent and Nokia knows how to patent things almost as good as their owners, Microsoft.
25. Edmund (Posts: 654; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
As I've said before, the HAAC (high amplitude audio capture) technology was developed by Nokia and belongs to them. "HDR" was merely a marketing term used by HTC for the purposes of rebranding technology they had no legal right to use or adverstise. Whether it was done in good faith or not is irrelevant.
There is no alternate technology (for use in mobile handsets) so HTC either develops its own or uses what is currently available.
32. andydroid (Posts: 14; Member since: 01 Jun 2012)
Nokia does not deserve that mic, its a waste it can only be used with those crappy windows phones.