x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Google pushing for quick adoption of its VP9 video compression technology

0. phoneArena 17 May 2013, 01:54 posted on

At Google I/O on Wednesday, Google discussed its VP9 video compression technology; the company sees this open source technology replacing the current H.264 codec. Already, Google is testing V9 on Chrome and YouTube. According to the company, VP9 requires only half of the bandwidth required by H.264...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 17 May 2013, 02:23 4

1. _Bone_ (Posts: 2106; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


Interesting that they don't wait for the H265 standard, which is also quite heavy on the processing but a more natural progression of the H264 standard. H265@10bit can compress a 4k movie into just a couple of gigs with insane picture quality.

posted on 17 May 2013, 14:28

10. Zero0 (Posts: 583; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)


Yeah.

And H.265 is based on patents and licensing. I shouldn't be forced to hand my money to a bunch of oligarchs if I want to watch a video on the Internet.

posted on 17 May 2013, 03:13 2

2. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


Given the hostilities between Google and Microsoft, and the fact Nokia is a close ally of Microsoft, I'd say the chances of there being any deal signed are pretty unlikely...

posted on 18 May 2013, 12:05

12. Jack1192 (Posts: 35; Member since: 30 Mar 2013)


but if the patent is regarded as a standards essential patent, then Nokia has no choice but to license it.

posted on 17 May 2013, 03:34 1

3. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)


I'd prefer to stick to H264 and H265.
File size is not an issue if i want to store a copy myself, I dislike excessive compression, it affects the video quality to some extent. Many of my series, movies and videos, some of them are only 30 minute each but each is around 1.5Gb in size. HDDs arent expensive, External 4TB with USB 3.0 costs only $190.

posted on 17 May 2013, 03:42 2

5. deacz (Posts: 149; Member since: 02 Nov 2011)


yea but some ppl watch a lot of their content on mobile devices, half the bandwith used seems like an awesome idea.

posted on 17 May 2013, 03:44 1

6. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)


For online streams it's a good idea, but for my personal storage i prefer less compression. I dont visit youtube much either, and quitting many services under google, including abandoning my gmail. I dont like the attitude of Google nowadays.

posted on 17 May 2013, 04:37

8. timeformiles (Posts: 7; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


True, I mostly keep myself in my 64GB flashdrive, but i might get a 4TB USB 3 hard drive which sounds nice. Love your Pic man, she loves Misaka too much~

posted on 17 May 2013, 14:29

11. Zero0 (Posts: 583; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)


I'd prefer to stick to free and open standards.

More bandwidth use is bad. More bandwidth use = more wireless data. That costs money. It also costs the host money, allowing a company like Netflix to expand their library while holding prices steady.

posted on 17 May 2013, 03:35 1

4. pongkie (Posts: 496; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)


open source except for MS lol

posted on 17 May 2013, 04:05 2

7. boosook (Posts: 932; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


Die, Nokia, die! (it's German for "The, Nokia, the")

posted on 17 May 2013, 11:48 1

9. medicci37 (Posts: 613; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)


Lmao. Good 1

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories