Google locks down Google Glass users after two hackathons
0. phoneArena 26 Jan 2013, 14:26 posted on
Two Google Glass events will soon be here with one scheduled for the end of this month in San Francisco and the other set to take place early next month in New York City for those who paid $1500 for the Explorer version of Google Glass; don't expect to hear first hand accounts about the tablet as attendees will be signing a restrictive non-disclosure agreement...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. cripton805 (Posts: 746; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)
With this many restrictions theyre not even yours anymore.
9. lilhart (Posts: 14; Member since: 22 Jan 2013)
Who said it was yours? Google wants to make sure only consumer grade products are sold, not half baked ones. This might be still a primitive version notwithstanding its capabilities...Remember the famous betas Google had...
10. jsdechavez (Posts: 651; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
They are developer units so Google still has rights to a very long, tight leash.
13. Imbatman (Posts: 10; Member since: 07 Jan 2013)
Would you make something that can revolutionize MultiMedia then give them out to test and create new things for them without having restrictions to say, Not allow other companies get info on them? To not allow someone to just be able to steal? (Reason to not take them outside on walks or play sports) If I was google, I would make sure there is a tracking chip or something on each one to make sure you can always and forever be able to know where they are during this phase to make sure you dont get Screwed by the 1 or 2 stupid people who will get them.
2. rusticguy (Posts: 2700; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
With so many conditions and google keeping data hostage the glass should have been offered free to those developers. Pay 1500 for being Alpha tester?
5. jroc74 (Posts: 3455; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)
This is standard confidentality agreement type suff tho. How many of us have even seen a rumored phone in the wild?
Just being a tester for software.....you sign similar agreements and are not supposed to talk about it.
I do agree.......they shoulda been offered for free if with all you cannot do. Were these restriction placed on that gaming device?
6. boosook (Posts: 610; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
No guys, those are not testers, those are not nerds who spent some money just to play with the latest gadget... those are professional developers, game studios, IT companies who invested money to be among the first who will be able to develop applications for the product. This means that when the product will be on the market, their applications will come out first and will have a considerable advantage on their competitors. That's what they are paying for, and to be honest it's not that much.
12. jroc74 (Posts: 3455; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)
You are right. I think there are dev versions of game consoles out. I know there is one for the PS3 and PS4. You have to pay for them. They are definitely not free...lol.
You dont really hear info about new things in the gaming industry until the companies wants you to know, for the most part anyway. There are always leaks...whether intentional or nor. One could consider the info about this NDA a leak.
3. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5173; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Damn wish i was their. They only do this too protect their software thats in the glasses. Still i can't wait too see em in action.
4. _Bone_ (Posts: 1748; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
It's to prevent Apple and other rivals to steal Google's technology.
7. rusticguy (Posts: 2700; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
Except for few things i guess there's nothing that money can't buy :)
8. Nikolas.Oliver (Posts: 1260; Member since: 01 Jul 2012)
Pa, did you pay for thr google glass at last year's google i/o? If so... Would you review it?
11. jsdechavez (Posts: 651; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
I remember there was this patent filing by Apple regarding blocking of network or data connection in specified (restricted) areas.. That patent could be beneficial to this so as not to make this a rogue device..