Google Nexus S introduced, curved screen and all
0. phoneArena 06 Dec 2010, 11:07 posted on
Seems like Andy Rubin, Google VP of Engineering, head of Android, couldn't keep the secret anymore, as he single-handedly announced the Google Nexus S (and Gingerbread) on the company's official blog...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. phone333 (Posts: 331; Member since: 04 Feb 2009)
Looking good !!! Now we need a 4G CDMA version
5. skymitch89 (Posts: 1293; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)
A 4G CDMA version would mean that Sprint would be the only service provider, if the bands allow it. A 4G LTE compatible with a CDMA chip would make it compatible with Verizon, if the bands allow it, and HSPA+ would make it capable of even greater speeds.
7. maccmill (Posts: 67; Member since: 29 Oct 2010)
LTE will be faster than HSPA+ in virtually all real world situations. TMo's speed claims come from their own tests, which we could easily say are done under the least network strain possible to amp up their numbers.
30. daniel_bargs (Posts: 325; Member since: 27 Nov 2010)
HSPA+ is faster as of now... even LTE is there because they dont push LTE to the limits... they are careful of bringing it fully blown because the cost is fully blown also. but LTE has higher bandwidth but slower speed... HSPA+ has faster speed but lower bandwidth
2. skymitch89 (Posts: 1293; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)
Android 2.3, and the Nexus S, is being announced just as Samsung is starting to roll out their Android 2.2 update to their Galaxy devices.
6. skymitch89 (Posts: 1293; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)
Also support for HSPA+ should've been put into the device as well. As of right now, the Nexus S is only a Galaxy S device that runs pure Android 2.3.
3. gkoepke (unregistered)
the evo or the epic for sprint will prob be the first 4g model to run android 2.3
4. Misanthropos (Posts: 56; Member since: 03 Aug 2010)
This looks like a Palm/HP phone. It's even got the ergonomic design. About time somebody took a page from their book.
8. maccmill (Posts: 67; Member since: 29 Oct 2010)
Thats like saying ferrari should take a page out of Kia's book. Every phone Palm has made since the last Treo has been a financial failure, hence why HP owns them now.
9. hickford (unregistered)
big disappointment, my wait for a phone with a dual core chip continues, was hoping for 1080p recording, but looking more like february hopefully.
then again they need to make games on the devices which need such power to play them, maybe one day we can play gran tourismo in 1080p from the palm of my hands, but until then phones like these seem very similar and not really an improvement. :(
14. Misanthropos (Posts: 56; Member since: 03 Aug 2010)
i think they just wanted to make a phone that looks good, that has hardware that has already gone through trial and error, so you know it'll work, and a device that has ideal specs for developing. if anything, those specs would make me feel more comfortable about buying it.
10. ecml490 (unregistered)
I would definitely get this phone. But sadly I am not because it is going to be on T-Mobile's network :-(
11. kurt (unregistered)
this phone was the most antisapated disappointment to me its the galaxy s with a front facing camera. if its suppose to be a developers phone it should be the best phone on the market no the 2nd or 3rd i would definetaly not buy this
16. Kurt (unregistered)
Us Kurt's think alike. I was so pumped for today to come and had been researching all the apps I would be putting on my first android device. Can't believe there is no expandable memory and really wish there was a dual core. Could live with the camera.
13. protozeloz (Posts: 5396; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
well i was expecting a bit more, the Nexus One had one of the fist 1Ghz possessors, it was a hardware feature everyone was looking for, so i was expecting the Nexus S to come with something a bit over the edge of technology.
15. testman22 (Posts: 338; Member since: 03 Nov 2009)
same processor speed, same camera performace as the nexus 1. i really dont see the android 2.3 as any kind of revisioning of the platform- just some minor tweaks. i'll be waiting for an 8+ MP camera with 1080p, dual chip processor, on a verizon 4g phone (and i dont think the wait will be any longer than 6 months or so
18. hickford (unregistered)
couldn't have said it any better myself
35. NB (unregistered)
I'm calling mid to late Febuary on VZW 4G. They should have enough nationwide coverage by then to release the devices.
17. Al (unregistered)
Its time to upgrade my nexus one.
But is there really no SD Card slot (under the cover)? They dont have to include/bundle a SD Card -- but a slot should be there for expansion and easy side loading!
Also, I hope it has dual-mics for noise cancellation.
Lets not take a step backward -- please include things from nexus one and add to it!
19. YaBoyJoe (unregistered)
I am so disappointed with this phone! I was ready to sell my Nexus 1 and add a few bucks to get the Nexus S. Basically its an all touch epic.... minus the 4 g!!! ..... Come on!!! what happen to dual core?? 2.3 is gonna come out on my phone anyday now. and no HSPA+!!! No HDMI out, and please tell me that there is expandable memory! 16 gigs does not compare to the 32 I can get on the nexus one... WTF Google! DO Better! u just made a Android I Phone!!!
20. DF334 (Posts: 36; Member since: 23 Feb 2009)
Whats up with the wining!! The main reason for this phone is as they said at the beginning of the video....a PURE ANDROID EXPERIENCE as well as being able to get the latest "STOCK" OS for the phone! For that reason...it'S enough for me! There are not many Manufactures releasing any Android model with STOCK Android OS anymore cause they dont want you to root it! Again, for that reason alone it'S enough! Did you NOT hear that the Nexus One is still getting Android 2.3?? One more thing DO you actually think that they will release an Android Phone without a SD card slot??? C'mon get a clue! I think for what they wanted to do, as far as show the speed of the OS and show any new features, I think they did an excellent job! If you want all that Dual-Core processor, 1080P recording, etc....then wait for the other companies to bring out Their own versions! I don't think its fair to shit on a Software based Company because the didnt release what you wanted. Google is Software not Hardware! If anything get on Samsung! Way to go Google...done it again!
23. testman22 (Posts: 338; Member since: 03 Nov 2009)
So do you think its a great idea to put a lamborghini engine inm the body of a honda civic??
Of course its not. The functionality of a good operating system is only as good as its hardware. People would like pure android on a phone that has enough memory to hold all their music, pictures, and app. They want speed for web browsing, and a great camera.
21. lolzorz (Posts: 13; Member since: 01 Nov 2010)
Almost everyone I knw has wanted the first Nexus One but now ,with a newer version coming out, Hopefully they will also give the phone to other carriers... like Verizon.
22. Hiro (unregistered)
Lose money! Was going to trade in my "my touch 4g", guess I'll wait two years for my contract to expire.Huge disappoinment.
24. Wardski (unregistered)
Made by Samsung = You gotta be fekking kidding me NOOOOooooo!!!
Curved screen = Dont leave it in your back pocket & fekking sit on it!!
Glossy case = Scratches galore & fingerprint magnet
512Mb Ram = Why not 768Mb????
1Ghz Single Core CPU = Thats Just Dumb.. Anyone in their right mind will wait for Dual Core..
Gingerbread = yum...
25. DF334 (Posts: 36; Member since: 23 Feb 2009)
ITs not a Desktop its a Phone!! If you owned any kind of 1GHz phone you wouldnt put any retarded statment like its dumb to have a single core processor! 768MB....really dude!
29. vinsterdamus (Posts: 58; Member since: 20 Feb 2010)
what's wrong with the screen? If you sit on your phone your just stupid. try a chair or a couch or something.. don't sit on your phone! 512ram hmm ok htc has a 768 phone, but just one. the 1Ghz from samsung is the one fastest in the business. ok the Omap on 1.2 is faster but hey samsung don't make them. The rest is partually true
26. Makapiapia (Posts: 26; Member since: 06 Dec 2010)
Dude did you watch the video? Google collaborated closely with samsung, so how can you blame samsung alone?
27. DG (unregistered)
It has expendable memory up to 32 GB its similar to a Galaxy S except for the curved screen, front facing camera, flash and new OS. You guys lack reading comprehension to not understand something so simple. 1 Ghz processors are fast enough though I'm also gonna wait for dual core but great phone
28. paynekiller (Posts: 139; Member since: 24 May 2010)
sorta effed up I just bought a Nexus One for a friend this summer for the same $529 +tax/shipping and six months later they offer something better for the very same price.
40. Simon S. (unregistered)
Would you rather the whole world stop innovating? :) Lol
31. yeo (unregistered)
Well at least this phone won't have a hardware problem like the HTC nexus one which has 3g problem
32. clevername (Posts: 1436; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)
Hmm. I'm really interested inthe contour screen. But if it adds no visual prowess to the display and just makes it "ergonomic" then there's little point. Other than that the only hardware upgrades to my nexus 1 are NFC chip, hummingbird(small speed upgrade) and the dedicated gpu. The gpu is the only upgrade worth mentioning there. And gingerbread so far is building up to be a disappointment. I am seeing little reason to upgrade my year old outta production google phone. And even fewer reasons to finally drop my iPhone for android all together.
33. Kakarotto (Posts: 253; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
What a disappointment. It's half year old Galaxy S with "Google" brand. GIVE US SOMETHING NEW!!!
34. Teitur (unregistered)
Google is sabotaging their own OS vs iPhone and even W7.
This phone has nothing groundbreaking.
If you want a generic Google phone you can get the Nexus ONE.
36. BReND0 (Posts: 74; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
idk maybe my rant but really whats next for christmas 2011 .... omg we have early test of a 3ghz quad-core , 13 megapixel triple flash 4.9 inch touch dual screen with video chat and smell o vision ...it it shows 5g speeds ALLLL for the price of 849$....but by the way u can only hold a call for 3 mins before the battery dies or u lose servie :) baaaaa hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaha
37. juse (unregistered)
this phone is amazing for me, I dont give a shit about no expasion slot because I dont need it anyway. I cant wait to get it =D
38. belovedson (Posts: 986; Member since: 30 Nov 2010)
Intel delayed their production of dual core Atoms. Primarily due to battery consumption and lack of speed upgrade. How on earth do you expect a lesser cpu maker to do better? Idiots and there constant whining.
At a price point of 199 for T-Mobile. This should make a competitively priced upper tier phone. Not to mention the shift from HTC to Samsung by Google, should make things interesting.
Good job Google. Thanks for touching base with the real consumer and their wallets.
39. Simon S. (unregistered)
You guys the Hummingbird 1Ghz is definitely an upgrade from a the last generation Snapdragon 1Ghz. It's built on a 45nm process instead of the Snapdragon's 65nm process which makes it plenty faster and more energy efficient. Also, the GPU on the Hummingbird SoC is a WHOLE GENERATION faster than that of the Snapdragon.
Wishing this comes out for Sprint :(