x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Google I/O to see Motorola X with Key Lime Pie?

0. phoneArena 19 Jan 2013, 09:20 posted on

An anonymous source is passing along the word that the Motorola X, the first model from the OEM to be produced in a manner that shows the world that Moto was purchased by Google, will be making an appearance at Google I/O this coming May; the model is said to have a 5 inch edge-to-edge display and runs Android 5.0 while being produced for multiple carriers...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 09:24 18

1. gmracer1 (Posts: 646; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)


I'm having a braingasm :D

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 09:32 25

5. MeoCao (unregistered)


lol, best news of the day, hope it's true.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 10:16 12

16. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)


Motorola and Google trying to compete with Samsung. Everyone wants to be like Samny. I wish Motorola luck another boring stock android device. They do better keeping there light skin let Nexus take that stock mantle. Either way the Galaxy S4 or Galaxy Note 3 they will not be.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 10:26 16

21. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


And I hope they wont be a Note or Galaxy phone. Samsung has pros n cons, Moto does too. I prefer the pros of Moto to Samsung. And I can deal with the cons of a Moto phone vs a Samsung phone.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 10:29 4

22. cripton805 (Posts: 1457; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)


"And I can deal with the cons of a Moto phone vs a Samsung phone"

That makes sense.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 10:41 6

25. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Yea....the cons of a Moto phone vs the cons of a Samsung phone.

I did just say they both have pros n cons....

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 11:22 16

35. gmracer1 (Posts: 646; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)


Cons of a Moto phone? WTF are you smoking? You must be talking about Moto's from 2-3yrs ago. Current Moto's = Kevlar backings, reinforced metal bodies (which are sealed), and a nanocoating on both the outside and inside (circuitry). ALL Samsungs = extremely cheap, plastic bodies.

I do like the S3 and I think it's the best phone Samsung has ever made, but I think all their other phones were garbage.

I also prefer MotoBlur and the internal hardware. Plus I think Moto makes better radios.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 11:59 2

39. MeoCao (unregistered)


I think Moto phones are not as successful as SS b-c they are more expensive and Moto's poor sales and post sale job.

Looks like Moto has learned from the past and I'm very hopeful about the new Motorola.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 12:01 4

40. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


lol. Moto uses mostly qualcomm and Nvidia parts. Nothing special about them.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 12:10 8

44. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


Actually, one thing that Motorola does do special is they skirt FCC regulation limits for "safe radiation" in their radio output. The result is that their phones usually kick ass in reception and call quality.

I just picked up their sliver bluetooth, and I have to say, out of all the bluetooths I've owned, this one sounds the best.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 12:14 9

45. MeoCao (unregistered)


I think Moto's phones are better built, SS has more gimmicky features.

But SS's advertising, promotion and distribution just destroy Moto's.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 16:25 1

74. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


I was speaking to the internals of Moto phones. Most everything inside of them is built by someone else. Externally yea, Moto's build quality can be quite good. Internally its very hard to compare to Samsung.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 14:09 3

58. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


it's not so much what kind of radios they are but how Motorola makes them perform between how the phone is designed, the kernels they use, there's different factors other than what kind of radios they're using. Motorola isn't just blowing out hot air when they say the Razr HD gets better reception than the SIII.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 19:07

89. jinwons (Posts: 95; Member since: 24 Nov 2010)


Believe or not, Note 2 has better reception than Razr HD. And GS3 is on par with Razr HD on reception with JB update. Samsung is surely able to build great radio if they really want.

posted on 20 Jan 2013, 19:52 1

123. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


i don't believe you because there is a Razr MAXX HD, a Razr M and 2 Galaxy S III's in my household and with my experience with all of them i still believe Motorola is ahead of Samsung in this area. this is Motorola here, get real. why do you think Motorola would tout this advantage if it wasn't there? if they wanted to lie about something they could've done a better job than that.

posted on 22 Jan 2013, 12:27

127. jinwons (Posts: 95; Member since: 24 Nov 2010)


Did you read my post correctly? I said Note 2 has better reception, not GS3.

posted on 23 Jan 2013, 13:40

128. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


"Believe or not, Note 2 has better reception than Razr HD. And GS3 is on par with Razr HD on reception with JB update. Samsung is surely able to build great radio if they really want."

i don't believe Samsung is even on par with Motorola much less ahead of them and that's based on experience from multiple Samsung and Motorola devices including their current flagship devices. i can't speak for the Note II but i doubt it's that much better than the SIII. i'll ask you again. why do you think Motorola would tout this advantage if it isn't there?

posted on 23 Jan 2013, 16:29

129. jinwons (Posts: 95; Member since: 24 Nov 2010)


I'm not arguing your experience or Moto's reputation with radio. I also had Samsung, Moto in my possession. Though Moto usually had a little higher dbm, it didn't matter much in practical usage in terms of signal holding, call quality. And where is link for Moto touting their better reception than S3? I like to see if they did any objective testing or just marketing claim.

My point is that Note 2 has outstanding signal reception among Sammy devices, which edges out some of Moto's latest. And it's not only me saying this. There are many forum threads where people switchng from Moto devices to Note 2 experienced better reception with Note 2. I agree that Moto has better reputation with cellular radio, but that doesn't necessarily mean future devices will follow the same trend. That's all I'm saying.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 16:22 1

73. phonemirer (Posts: 111; Member since: 07 Dec 2012)


it was kevlar or carbon, anyway, razr maxx back has an awesome badass look, i think it is better than s2

posted on 20 Jan 2013, 08:31

116. carlosechev07 (Posts: 39; Member since: 16 Oct 2012)


I'm ok with your declaration, Moto's building quality is superior than Samsung cheap plastic body.. but Sammy designs are sexies than Moto..!!

posted on 20 Jan 2013, 08:41 2

118. carlosechev07 (Posts: 39; Member since: 16 Oct 2012)


I'm ok with your declaration, Moto's building quality is superior than Samsung cheap plastic body.. but Sammy designs are sexies than Moto, but I Like too much the small bizels that Moto has featured in Razr M, (a 5 inch display + edge to edge) = big super-portable phablet..!!

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 16:37 7

77. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1334; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)


Whoa whoa whoa, I think that everyone needs to remember something very important here: the Motorola of the past is not necessarily the Motorola of the future. This is going to be the first real phone that will showcase it's new owner, Google. Therefore, when it comes to things like hardware and even software, we cannot know what really to expect. Now, that's not to say that some of the things we have come to expect from Motorola will be thrown out the door such as razor thin aesthetics combined with premium materials. What it does mean is that you can expect some of the cons of Motorola devices in the past are definitely going to be addressed such as the software.

Now, what would be really cool (though not likely right now) is if Google announced the Motorola X as its flagship device for its own carrier (Dish-Google). A man can dream...

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 10:45 12

26. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Nobody wants to be like Samsung, they just want to compete, which is normal in business. It's just Motorola is being the first to take a step further than the rest of the competitors and be a direct competitor by releasing on all carriers.

PA got mixed up in the reporting, in the original article at DroidForums they say that it will have additional Motorola software add-ons to stock Android, and not be pure stock Android like PA said.

But anyways, you're right. This Motorola X won't be the Galaxy S4 of the Note 3. They'll be completely on par with it, maybe the Motorola will be better to some, and the Samsung will be better to some, but on all levels Motorola will be the biggest competitor to Samsung in the Android world with this X phone.

Samsung has extra software features (that most of hardly get used, honestly), so does Motorola along with much faster updates to the newest Android version.

Samsung has removable battery, Motorola has better build strength with water resistance along with bigger batteries.

Samsung will have their flagships across all carriers, so will Motorola.

You call them advantages, everyone else calls them trade offs. There is no definite advantage to choosing Samsung over anyone else, especially since we've gotten to a point in time where power is a null statement when all new processors are extremely powerful (with graphics to match) and can run anything for the next 2 or 3 years without breaking a sweat. So there will be ZERO difference in everyday performance, something Samsung has held over everyone with their Exynos chips, until now.

All Samsung has now is sales, which relates nothing to actual quality. Unless you work for Samsung, you shouldn't be bragging about that. And if this Motorola X phone succeeds, Samsung's sales will be dropping over the course of 2013.

Every manufacturer gets a time where there company will be run into the ground. Will this be Samsung's? Definitely *not*. This year, it will probably be Apple who gets the hammer unless they change something within the next 2 years. But, this will show Samsung that they will have some good competition, and hopefully Sammy will oblige Motorola by playing hardball right back at them. Then the consumers are the real winners.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 11:03 4

30. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Exactly. I dont try to knock Samsung phones....I just prefer Motorola phones overall. Every phone has pros n cons. If anyone thinks otherwise...I dont know what to say.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 14:10 1

60. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


couldn't have said it better myself. c':

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 16:29 2

75. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


I concur, twas a good comment.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 10:53 3

29. MeoCao (unregistered)


SS did a lot for Android and deserves the success, but the domination of SS is not good for Android.

It's not SS fault but other OEMs must step up to make Android ecosystem balanced and competitive which drives more innovation.

So next to Sony's Xperia Z Moto's new flagship with new business approach is a great news.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 11:04

31. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


And I forgot....I really like what I see from Sony's new phone. I would have to try one first tho before saying if I like it or not.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 12:19 3

47. CanYouSeeTheLight (Posts: 1116; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)


You are right, Motorola wants to be Samsung indeed! I bet they are running around their headquarters to switch their superb kevlar and metal body for cheap plastic, and their huge batteries for normal sized batteries. Either way for me a better Nexus manufacturer would be Motorola, Sammy had their shot and they made a plastic phone, as always. A Motorola Nexus with a Kevlar and metal body with Razr M like aesthetics sound like divine to me.

posted on 19 Jan 2013, 12:28 1

48. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


google competes with samsung? without google there wouldn't be samsung as we know it.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories