Google Glass to be ad-free?
0. phoneArena 16 Apr 2013, 08:03 posted on
We didn't see it coming, but it looks like Google Glass will not be shamelessly throwing advertisements at us every once in a while. According to the Terms & Conditions of Google Glass, application developers will not be allowed to serve ads to their users...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Of course it will be ad-free, I don't want to walk like an idiot with a glasses of full bunch of ads! xD
3. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 8402; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
The concept of Glasses already completes that part. Walking around with ads is the least of the problem.
6. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
And I guess you're waiting for the iWatch right? I know you are! :)
13. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Why I would want to wait for the iWatch? I don't want it!
A Sony Smartwatch is ok for me! :)
2. jsdechavez (Posts: 712; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
Not on a $1500 device of course. Perhaps there's a cheaper version for the masses with ad-overload. haha
4. davecann2 (Posts: 460; Member since: 15 Mar 2011)
This is just my opinion but I thing Google glasses will fail....
1. Too expensive : I don’t see the average person buying these things. With a hi price tag they won’t be introduced to the mass market.
2. Not practical : Seriously... Is anyone really going to ware these on a regular basis? They look ridiculous and serve no real purpose other than being a toy.
3. As smart phone continue to become more advanced I don’t see people using gimmicky toys like this. Not to mention all the companies developing smart watches.
5. haseebzahid (Posts: 1853; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
You Sir totally nailed it right i also see it a expensive toy for 8 year old kids birthday
8. lyndon420 (Posts: 3255; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)
I'd rather just look straight ahead at what interests me...instead of looking down at a tiny screen on my wrist that is even smaller than a phone screen.
9. protozeloz (Posts: 5393; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
1. Too expensive: the models for the beta users are, there has been no word about a final consumer product that can be purchased at your store let alone the retail price for a mass production device.
2. Not practical: Same was said about the note, "people would look ridiculous with that giant phablet" "its too big to be practical" guess what? Its selling
3. Depends on its appeal, smarphones can't do augmented reality better than glass...
This will in the end depend of how the final product is and how the commercial campaign proposes uses for it, if this gets support from many companies it could become something people might depend on
Don't call it a fail just yet or you might end up having to swallow those words latter I know I did once with the note :/
12. davecann2 (Posts: 460; Member since: 15 Mar 2011)
I guess we will just have to see.
BTW... people who use phablets look ridiculous...lol...j/k
14. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
if THE GLASS aren't price at 499-899 i won't buy one. if they can try too keep it between 250-399 i wouldn't mind buying. just guessing on the price tag here.
16. JonBjSig (Posts: 176; Member since: 17 Nov 2011)
1. The price will most likely go down when the device hits the consumer market.
2. It is practical, to some people, most people don't think bluetooth headsets are practical and yet they're still widely sold.
Maybe it'll be a niche market, maybe it'll be the next big thing it remains to be seen.
7. RaKithAPeiRiZ (Posts: 1488; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)
cheaper to strap a go pro on your head and spend the remaining $1300 on something worthwhile
19. haseebzahid (Posts: 1853; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
yes start running across ur street collect garbage instead of coins jump of the speed breakers run from the cops instead of demons i guess u can till u run out of breath