x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

For a second time, Appeals Court refuses to issue stay on injunction against Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1

0. phoneArena 19 Jul 2012, 14:35 posted on

The The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on two motions made by Samsung in regards to the preliminary injunction that the District Court has placed upon sales of the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 14:52 5

1. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

Sammy did shoot themselves in the foot when they stated that an injunction wouldn't hurt them. Loose lips sink ships (or, in this case, sales of the Tab 10.1). Live and learn.

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 14:57 5

2. Aeires (unregistered)

Sounds like the legal department needs to have a talk with the PR department.

As for the Siri patent, every phone manufacturer should be in an uproar over this, not just Samsung. That patent is far too vague and broad reaching for any company to possess. Dumbing down smartphones isn't good for anyone.

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 15:34 4

3. marchels14 (unregistered)

apple saw that galaxy tab and galaxy nexus is a serious competition to iPhone and iPad, that's why they sued Samsung because it is the one of the biggest phone and tablet makers out there,they saw that its not worth suing sinking companies or small ones and the patent thing was the excuse because every one copies everyone that how it happens.

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 16:23 4

4. Gawain (Posts: 423; Member since: 15 Apr 2010)

What's funny is there's an article on Yahoo! stating that a court in Britain is forcing Apple to run ads that Samsung did NOT copy them. ;-P

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 16:29 6

5. plgladio (Posts: 314; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)

US is not that smart like UK :D

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 17:03 1

6. Non_Sequitur (Posts: 1111; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)

Lol yep! It's all over the web!!

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 18:18 1

7. pegasso (Posts: 285; Member since: 27 Nov 2011)

you mean this ?

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 19:33 1

8. darkvadervip (Posts: 365; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)

Wow US must been smart when we became independent from British rule. Just goes to show US courts supports apple and uk courts are bought by google. Or am I just noticing that.

posted on 20 Jul 2012, 02:51 1

9. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)

no, Apple paid to court in US and common sense wins in UK ;)

posted on 20 Jul 2012, 03:11

10. xtian1103 (Posts: 363; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)

no, google paid the uk court and anti-copying wins in us.

posted on 20 Jul 2012, 04:16

13. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)

do you mean this blatant copying by Apple:
http://goo gl/0TcE3
deal with that Apple has copied EVERYTHING, dear blind guy ;)

posted on 20 Jul 2012, 13:19

15. xtian1103 (Posts: 363; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)

ah yeah you're right. samsung did not copy apple's ipad. coz those 5.000 people who bought the galaxy tab knows it's not the same. ok maybe 7,000 people bought tha galaxy tab. that's it!

posted on 21 Jul 2012, 14:59

16. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)

Are an 8 year-old boy? :)

posted on 20 Jul 2012, 05:01

14. andro. (Posts: 1999; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)

Apple has a draconian control of the US courts but as recent articles have shown world wide people are more aware to apples wrong doings

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories