For a second time, Appeals Court refuses to issue stay on injunction against Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1
0. phoneArena posted on 19 Jul 2012, 14:35
The The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on two motions made by Samsung in regards to the preliminary injunction that the District Court has placed upon sales of the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Droid_X_Doug posted on 19 Jul 2012, 14:52 5 1
Sammy did shoot themselves in the foot when they stated that an injunction wouldn't hurt them. Loose lips sink ships (or, in this case, sales of the Tab 10.1). Live and learn.
2. Aeires (unregistered) posted on 19 Jul 2012, 14:57 5 0
Sounds like the legal department needs to have a talk with the PR department.
As for the Siri patent, every phone manufacturer should be in an uproar over this, not just Samsung. That patent is far too vague and broad reaching for any company to possess. Dumbing down smartphones isn't good for anyone.
3. marchels14 posted on 19 Jul 2012, 15:34 4 0
apple saw that galaxy tab and galaxy nexus is a serious competition to iPhone and iPad, that's why they sued Samsung because it is the one of the biggest phone and tablet makers out there,they saw that its not worth suing sinking companies or small ones and the patent thing was the excuse because every one copies everyone that how it happens.
4. Gawain posted on 19 Jul 2012, 16:23 4 0
What's funny is there's an article on Yahoo! stating that a court in Britain is forcing Apple to run ads that Samsung did NOT copy them. ;-P
7. pegasso posted on 19 Jul 2012, 18:18 1 0
you mean this ?
http://www.phonearena.com/news/UK-judge-rules-Apple-has-to-post-to-its-website-that-Samsung-didnt-copy-the-iPad_id32411
8. darkvadervip posted on 19 Jul 2012, 19:33 1 2
Wow US must been smart when we became independent from British rule. Just goes to show US courts supports apple and uk courts are bought by google. Or am I just noticing that.
9. anywherehome posted on 20 Jul 2012, 02:51 1 0
no, Apple paid to court in US and common sense wins in UK ;)
10. xtian1103 posted on 20 Jul 2012, 03:11 0 1
no, google paid the uk court and anti-copying wins in us.
13. anywherehome posted on 20 Jul 2012, 04:16 0 0
do you mean this blatant copying by Apple:
http://goo gl/0TcE3
;)
deal with that Apple has copied EVERYTHING, dear blind guy ;)
15. xtian1103 posted on 20 Jul 2012, 13:19 0 0
ah yeah you're right. samsung did not copy apple's ipad. coz those 5.000 people who bought the galaxy tab knows it's not the same. ok maybe 7,000 people bought tha galaxy tab. that's it!
16. anywherehome posted on 21 Jul 2012, 14:59 0 0
Are an 8 year-old boy? :)
14. andro. posted on 20 Jul 2012, 05:01 0 0
Apple has a draconian control of the US courts but as recent articles have shown world wide people are more aware to apples wrong doings






