First images of Motorola V750 for Verizon

2. Proto732 (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 15:13 0 0

Grant it, there are not that many pictures ... but to me this looks like yet another Razor2 (with a different keypad slapped on it). Not that that is bad, but just shows Moto has been stuck in a design loop for the past 5 years.

3. vzw rep (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 15:23 0 0

they already came out with a razr 2...some people leave comments not knowing about the phone game...get off phone arena!

4. sexy beast (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 16:41 0 0

Ok vzw has good phones but they are kinda ugly and AT&T has ok phones and they have a lot more style.

5. Junior (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 17:17 0 0

Wow, it looks like Verizon is trying to steer away a little bit from it's default UI. You see it's a bit different on this phone than with past generation phones like the 1st gen LG Chocolate. I really hope VZW starts letting manufacturers use their own interface's. Verizon is coming out with some sweet phones in the next year, and I sure wouldn't like to see them butchered and brought down by Verizon's dull and somewhat cruddy interface.

6. shadow (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 18:34 0 0

This is a ugly phone att has better looking phones and it does kind of look like a razor. Also to number 4 the iphone is so much better than the garbage voyager.

7. James55 (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 19:02 0 0

I used to have the i-phone before I sold it for the Voyager. Until you have owned both phones you have no idea what your talking about. The mbl tv on the voyager kicks so much ass. Plus I hate at&t's shitty network.

8. George (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 19:41 0 0

Even though there are so many arguments over which network is better: VZW and AT&T, I think we can all agree that no othernetwork could beat either of them...at least in the USA. As for this phone, I don't see the point of it, and since I have only seen the inside so far, it looks pretty ugly.

9. Scott (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 20:08 0 0

The point of the phone is to make phone calls from. Just thought I would clear that up since you were having trouble.

10. (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 20:25 0 0

what do you idiots expect? it's a bottom rung motorola to replace the W385 it's for the same people who think the 385 is NICE thsi isn;t a high end phone, some of you are complete idiots, everyone thinks that every phone should be loaded with MP# players, HTML browsers and 5 MP cameras. news flash froto there are OTHER markets in the US besides the high end handset user.

11. sweetass! (unregistered) posted on 11 Apr 2008, 20:31 0 0

Ok WTF AT&T has sexy hot phones and they r pretty good but vzw has kinda crappy looking phones and they are pretty good so shut up! All of u r little babys!

12. FAUguy posted on 12 Apr 2008, 01:39 0 0

Why are people bringing up the iPhone and Voyager in here? Those have absolutely NOTHING to do with the Motorola V750. Please continue your arguing somewhere else!!!

13. debilev posted on 12 Apr 2008, 02:10 0 0

I'm on the same opinion, Why ppl mess this phone with phones like Voyager and the mighty "iphone"?! It's just a regular motorola razr-like phone...nothing new here...

14. Steve (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 04:11 0 0

The UI on vzw phones isn't that bad. If you can't figure out how to use it, you don't deserve the free right to purchase cell phone.

15. rob21i (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 09:00 0 0

This is a push to talk phone.

16. Mike (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 09:10 0 0

No, Sprint does not rock, even though there are arguments between AT&T and VZW...that's because they are the two best networks.

17. (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 10:44 0 0

Its a cool design... but it look like its going to be a pain to try to text on, and that stupid UI needs to go.

18. nick Ahn (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 12:59 0 0

You can stop saying that phone a is better than phone b now. Unless the page is a comparison of the two phones, you guys keep bitching off about which phone is better. Phones can be better or worse for people, depending on their need and their wants.. Pretty obvious? Phone carriers can be better or worse based upon location and financial situation. Even though I have sprint (which really does frustrate me) on rare occasions, I do get service where other carriers do not. GET IT?

19. DeeMan (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 16:20 0 0

I see a lot of talk about how the phone "looks". I'm more concerned with how it "works". VZW may not have the prettiest phones but who cares? Why would you shell out megabucks for a "good looking" phone that's absolutely horrible in the service department. I've seen the market flooded with pretty phones and they aren't all that great because of the concept; the manufacturers load it with features but forget one major thing .... IT'S A PHONE !!! I don't even care if VZW's UI is ugly ... it's practical and simple. This makes it easier to migrate to another device without having to take a user manual along with you because the "new" phone's UI is so much different. That's why I'm glad VZW decided to standardize their menus. Like I said, I hope this is good "phone", cause Motorola has been slackin' in that department lately.

20. bc (unregistered) posted on 12 Apr 2008, 16:49 0 0

As phones get more complex and have more functionality, having standardized menus can hinder functionality and ease of use. When all phones have basically the same setup and same capabilites it makes more sense, but that is less the case these days... This particular phone is a basic phone that fulfills its function. What has hurt motorola is that it has been nearly completely gutted and left for dead.. It sucks that an american manufacturer is having so much trouble staying above water in this industry. I sure wish they had braught the Ming to the US market back in 2005. I tihnk that would have made them more competative... as for verizon and att they provide a service and niether does it very well... they manage to piss people off, and get them locked into contracts... It is a terrable buisness model... it makes our customers feel trapped and resentful... but they all do it...