First design comparison shots and sample images from the Sony Xperia GX 13MP camera appear
0. phoneArena 21 May 2012, 03:50 posted on
The pics, which are of the photographer's Xperia arc sitting next to the Xperia GX display, and of the room insides, are taken with a non-final unit, which still had some kinks to be ironed out, says the person who took the shots, so the final firmware results are probably going to look different. Still, in these low-light conditions the camera performs pretty well, without excessive noise or softness, so we can't wait for the retail shots...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Jonathan41 (Posts: 524; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)
Why the S4 dual-core? I know it's a good processor and all but will it effectively get you though a 2 year contract? Seems a little weird considering this is Sony's flagship device. Going head to head with the HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy SIII.
Nice camera though. Lets see how long before someone says "It's no match for the PureView's camera" lol
3. pikapowerize (banned) (Posts: 1869; Member since: 03 May 2012)
Lets see how long before someone says "It's no match for the PureView's camera" lol
haha because its true! but still great camera!
sony is, after all, a digital camera company too!
17. RamyRamz69 (Posts: 389; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)
The S4 chipset on the One S owned the s**t out of the Tegra 3 in the One X. And knowing Sony is like the best optimizing company out there(Assuming they got 3300+ out of the Snapdragon S3 chipset) the S4 chip on this one is gonna dominate the One X.
32. Jonathan41 (Posts: 524; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)
From what I've heard most benchmarks aren't optimized for quad-cores yet. In the AnTuTu score the One X destroys the One S.
27. Dr.Phil (Posts: 789; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
There is no mention of the GX coming to any of the carriers here in the United States, so I don't know why you would be worrying about 2-year contracts. You can just buy the GX unlocked and use it for however long you deem necessary. Also, you won't really be seeing any quad-core processors on any phones released here in the U.S. until probably this fall due to the fact that the quad-core processors that are already released do not support LTE here in the U.S. If you really feel that you want a quad-core processor then I am almost certain that Sony will be releasing a quad-core S4 phone later this year.
4. pikapowerize (banned) (Posts: 1869; Member since: 03 May 2012)
i had a question.. what is the difference on sony's android to samsung's or htc's?
all i know is that samsung has its touchwiz and htc has its sense!
what make sony or motorola different?
5. scnix (Posts: 41; Member since: 01 Jul 2010)
Based off my experience, among the android phones;
Sony has the best sound and borderline best camera and screen (Mobile Bravia really makes the screen shine)
HTC has the best build in Interface functionality (SenseUI) and borderline best camera (HTC One X). Not too sure about its sound as I don't have a HTC device with Beats audio.
Samsung has the best screen and processor.
Never tried Motorola, so I'm not too sure.
6. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
When sony learns that picture quality doesn't depend on post processing and raw power and to achieve really great photo quality they need to use BIGGER sensor and BETTER optics...they will do really good camera. So far nothing stunning.
7. PackMan (Posts: 277; Member since: 09 Mar 2012)
Idiot, Sony uses one of the best Sensor Sony Exmor R in its high-end smartphones.
9. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
talk like this to your relatives, midget.
Exmor R is overrated and it has been proved so many times that I'm not going to repeat that one more time (just don't mention EISA award....please, don't be such a moron).
HTC was always crap (with some exceptions like mytouch 4 g), one x makes pretty good photos but nothing to write home about. S III makes better photos than sony and magical exmor r sensor.
Learn something about photography in general and photography in mobile realm. Then speak. Theretofore, shut up
10. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
galaxy SII &SIII use Sony's camera sensors! :)
and FYI, the Xperia S' camera was praised without exception and is generally considered the best camera on an android phone
16. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
omnivision would be a smarter choice for apple. period
11. PackMan (Posts: 277; Member since: 09 Mar 2012)
Lol, you behave as if you are the best photographer in the world troll. Who said Exmor R is magical sensor idiot but it is one of the better ones out on the market.
SIII isn't even out on the market.
Why don't you bring up pureview then?
Stop speaking out of your ass and go f**k that rodent on your pp while you are at it.
14. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
yeah, and the best is that apple and samsung can do much more with those oh greatest exmor r than sony.
I don't have to mention about pureview becuse it is obvious it's the best camera centric phone ever made.
And statement made by sony was...ridiculous.
Given your attitude and language you are using you're a truly troll. Oh wait...you have the right to be infallible. Yes, all trolls are infallible. That's the way it is.
Xperia S is the best cameraphone in android realm?
Myth about se/sony great cameras fell down a long time ago. They are trying to rebuild it and it's great. But it's a long way to do that.
Any of you has xperia S? Or S III? Or one x? Or mytouch 4g?
No? So shut up.
You judge pictures by looking at them. The same goes to samsung, sonyu, htc, nokia.
And for me sony doesn't make the best cameraphones. S III is better (I don't believe saying that because i've never liked sammy).
Just like you've said. One of the better ones, but not the best (what you stated earlier and your attitude only proves that).
Petite (or cheap) sensor/optic won't give you good quality no matter how hard you try.
Take some pills and keep your hair on kid.
15. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
18. PackMan (Posts: 277; Member since: 09 Mar 2012)
Who said optics has nothing to do with image quality huh? Samsung Galaxy SIII's camera improvement not only has to do with sensors and optics but also the ISP.
And lol jacka** keep believing what you like. Ovt sensors are not better than equivalent Exmor R sensors.
So, you claim yourself as camera pundit based on Cnet articles. Ha ha you make me laugh. Go back under the bridge and sulk kid.
19. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
jesus christ. I gave you an example midget. You know what example is? Here. This time slower. E-X-A-M-P-L-E. Check dictionary.
My knowledge about photography is based on my own experience with photography. I've been taking photos for life when you were still sucking your mom's nipple.
Furthermore I've never said I'm an alfa and omega. That's your words so stay with it.
And omnivision is better. Shame Apple didn't decide to cooperate with them.
You're behaving like a rocky rooster.
25. PackMan (Posts: 277; Member since: 09 Mar 2012)
You claim yourself as being older than me but you are getting worked up over some conversation over internet forum. Ha ha you may be older but i can say that you are nothing but pea brain. F**king idiot.
Go back to your basement.
You have lifetime experience in photography? Ha Ha then I am king of the Universe. You must be experienced in photographing your own penis and masturbating over it.
Oh, and have you got hold of retail version of Galaxy SIII? Or are you scouring the internet to make the comparisons. Unlike you Mr. Internet . photographer I will hold my judgement on SIII until I test it with my own hands, even though i believe the camera is "one" the best.
Now get off that computer chair, go out and have some fresh air you senile idiot.
31. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Given level of your iq ad the way you behave, EOT from my side.
You're too miserable and meaningless to continue any discussion with you.
28. KaloqnYo (Posts: 22; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)
anonymous 13 March, 2012 10:47
i just want to point out that as you have the Xperia S set to a 16:9 aspect ratio you are taking a 9 megapixel image and not a 12.1 megapixel image you would get from a 4:3 aspect ratio. This article as a result is not a true representation of the full capablities of the Xperia S.
Phahaaha poor iCrap fans ! You know Xperia S is better than the iCrap 4s ! HAHAHAHA YOU ARE SOOO POOR :D !
22. Robottoe (Posts: 12; Member since: 21 May 2012)
"achieve really great photo quality" = Use a DSLR,
No point argue-ing about the photo quality, the main point of a phone is just to make calls and also messaging. Nowadays phone camera's are somewhat mediocre overall. But definitely Sony has the edge when it comes to photos due to the Bravia Engine and Exmor R sensor. There is a side by side comparison of all the phones vs Sony's camera and clearly you can see the difference
24. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
what's bravia engine has to do with photo quality???! Does it mean you tend to keep your photos only on sd card inside your phone?
Why should I carry around dslr camera all the time when I can take a shoot using my phone? Stop bulls**tting about "phone is for calls and messages". It was a long time ago.
99% people wouldn't be able to see a difference between e.g. N8 or S III and a stand alone compact camera (I'm not taking about high end cameras).
33. Robottoe (Posts: 12; Member since: 21 May 2012)
"Why should I carry a dslr all the time?" Well sir just f**k on all your lame excuse ,real photographers take their dslr everywhere with no compromise.
I'm sorry to say you can't afford one dslr..really..
Besides have you not compared side by side Sony's bravia engine with other phones? Really it makes alot of difference. And about the phone is for call and messages sort of "crap" that I mentioned. What do you use your phone for? Playing unnecessary games and take lame ass pics with it and when there is emergency,ur phone has no battery left to call the police in case you get butt raped...
8. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Aside from a GPU that can handle top games that will be out in like two years, this phone has everything i need.
It beats HTC hands down with camera(harware shutter on top), SD slot, removable battery..great job Sony
13. FoneAddict (Posts: 125; Member since: 05 Jul 2011)
I hope Sony continues to improve like this. This can only be good for us mobile phone enthusiasts!
21. Robottoe (Posts: 12; Member since: 21 May 2012)
Probably wont get this phone when it releases , but kinda wanna wait for the year end when Google is releasing the new Android 5.0 Jellybean which they too gonna release not 1, but 5 Nexus flagship devices from 5 different manufacturers. Hopefully Sony is one of them. If not, then definitely this GX
23. medomoo (Posts: 3; Member since: 28 Oct 2011)
What about HDMI Port, we see Dock connected to Tv But in the mobile there is no HDMI Port !!!!!
26. hitechredneck (Posts: 53; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
No HDMI output just micro USB need a convertor cable. This is another phone of the 16 coming to NTT Docomo japan's mobile carrier. Was reading the story on CNET in japan along with the SX too and new Panasonic ELUGA p-07D power. Thinking maybe around august release date along with the Panasonic. It's got a way better LTE network over there three times the best speed of our LTE networks.
29. the_EDJ (Posts: 32; Member since: 28 Sep 2008)
Me want. So bad.
As I don't see Sony making any major CDMA phones it might be time to jump ship. As a Sprint fan (apologist?) I'm starting to get fed up with their continuous dropping of features (Premiere Club benefits waived, early upgrades squashed). If I can test T-Mobile or AT&T coverage in my area it may be my big purchase for the year.
30. DawsonLee (Posts: 25; Member since: 03 Apr 2012)
It's indeed a very gorgeous phone, and very nice specs too, the S4 is more than capable in matching the Quad cores out in the market now, so no concerns over specs +killer design, gonna be a big hit