First camera samples from the Nokia Lumia 710 and 800
0. phoneArena 26 Oct 2011, 10:12 posted on
After getting the chance of playing around with Nokia’s upcoming Windows Phone devices, the Lumia 710 and 800, we’re naturally curious to see how the two fare when it comes to snapping some photos. Of course, the Nokia Lumia 800 is undoubtedly...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
2. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 466; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)
Wow, now that's a great camera! At least for the 800, I didn't really examine the 701 photos, computer too slow...
3. bigboss (Posts: 74; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
Nokia cameras are always the best and thats no surprise here too.
4. bigboss (Posts: 74; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
Your computer too slow? I'm browsing and posting comments from my good old nokia 2700 classic running s40v5 and its working like charm. That is why we love Nokia.
14. networkdood (Posts: 6250; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
ok, maybe he has a PC or MAC, thus he said computer, and has a poor connection - like slow DSL or dial-up?
5. chunk1x (Posts: 248; Member since: 25 Jun 2011)
Not consistent in focus but not bad at all. Slightly better than the N9 but not by much.
6. SemperFiV12 (Posts: 684; Member since: 09 Nov 2010)
Im going to go ahead and be blunt... THIS IS DEFINITELY NOT the "great quality" photographic experience that MSFT recently wanted to lead in. If you want to make bold statements, you need to make sure you follow through on them (and it is difficult since they are a software company and cameras are handled by the hardware manufacs)...
With that being said, these are GREAT quality pictures for what we have NOW. If you want to be relevant in this market, let alone need to make up a lot of ground and are playing major time catch up (both Nokia and WP), you need to WOW your audience. And I am definitely not WOWed with the quality of these pictures, nor the specs for the phone.
So I am content, but this does not give me a reason or urge to drop my phone and use my upgrade for it.
15. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1044; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
Would anyone really upgrade their phone just for a better camera though? And it IS a phone and 99% of people will just view the photos they take with their phone on their phone, or on facebook so this camera is more than good enough.
7. Cyd07 (Posts: 83; Member since: 03 Oct 2011)
Quite good. I'm not impressed so far. But we should wait for real results, in reviews : photo taken with time, in different conditions, etc... And wait for comparatives side-to-side : GSII, iPhone 4S, HTC Amaze, Xperia Arc S, at least. And the grandfather of all camerahones, the N8...but that's just for fun, it will outrate all of these phones. Comparatives are the only way to discover some differences...say, the Iphone 4S is really good, but put its photos side to side with xperia arc s photos and you will see that the Arc S is slightly better. Not that it put the shale on the 4S, but still, it's better.
But, since these of the N9 are pretty good, these of the 800 should be too.
8. Mobile-X-Pert (Posts: 565; Member since: 20 Dec 2010)
Dude the weather was cloudy, you cant really judge the quality yet...but check out some photo samples GSMarena managed to take, you´ll be really impressed!
9. wisdom01 (Posts: 10; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
So sorry USA....you don't get the Nokia 800, you get the toy 710 phone. Maybe next year. Samsung & HTC have nothing to worry about. This is so disappointing....Nokia you really do hate the US it seems.
12. 530gemini (Posts: 2198; Member since: 09 Sep 2010)
@wisdom. And the top 2 os in the world (android and ios) are from the US. And even your n800's os is from the US. Silly :)
10. 530gemini (Posts: 2198; Member since: 09 Sep 2010)
Hmmmm, I don't see android fanboys in here. Oh that's right. They're all Symbian lovers before they turned to android fanboys :)
13. networkdood (Posts: 6250; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
... - wrong answer...thanks for playing....well, not really...prior phones were:
Android, Win 6.5, Win 5 - in that order from newest to oldest.
11. Quist (Posts: 3; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
Not very impressed with the photos from the 800. Another website posted pics from the phone and raved about the overall quality, despite average noise and detail levels. The pics on that site had a much better color and white balance. These photos almost look identical to ones from the N9 that I've seen in comparisons with the iphone 4S, where they were far too cold in tone and lacking in the fine detail of the iphone. Waiting to see what the new 900 offers, but so far I'm quite disappointed, although I admittedly had very high expectations coming from tne N8.