First Lumia 1520 photo samples reveal that the camera on the new Nokia is no wimp
0. phoneArena 24 Oct 2013, 03:48 posted on
Nokia fans, and Lumia 1020 aficionados in particular, have no doubt come to recognize the name of National Geographic's photographer Stephen Alvarez...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
2. _Bone_ (Posts: 2148; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Very nice, but note that the night pictures were taken from a tripod at ISO200 around 1s exposure, which is not useful hendheld and/or when taking a picture of ppl. or anything moving. I'd rather see samples at ISO2000 and 1/16s, something humanly possible to remain steady, both photographer and subject.
4. eisenbricher (Posts: 972; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
You are asking for too much, serious people will never take serious night pics with shaky hands. Tripod is a must.
14. _Bone_ (Posts: 2148; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Did you read the post? I said I wanted to see higher ISO pictures for everyday situations like taking picture of ppl. which is not asking too much since the phone is capable doing so. These low ISO tripod shots are awesome but no tripod I know of can freeze your friends or moving cars.
24. eisenbricher (Posts: 972; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
Did you even take look at 2nd and 2rd pic? They aren't the ones with large exposure times. Not even the 3rd one.
16. rd_nest (Posts: 1093; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
You go around carrying a tripod everyday? If that's the case, I will rather carry a D800 with me.
18. rd_nest (Posts: 1093; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
BTW, no serious people will ever do 'photoshoot' with a tiny mobile -camera sensor.
25. eisenbricher (Posts: 972; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
But National Geographic's Stephen Alvarez just did
32. rd_nest (Posts: 1093; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
Yea, coz he was paid by Nokia to do that. Is that so hard to grasp or are you that stupid??
34. Bernoulli (Posts: 2299; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
People photoshop even with the crappy Galaxy series cameras, it's called Instagram
53. elitewolverine (Posts: 3111; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
It was also about portability.
Sure you could carry a huge camera. I have 2 DSLR's, that for zoom and pictures are freaking awesome.
But for every day use, a 1020 is just simply amazing. Will it beat a dslr? Not really.
But for people not wanting to flop down $700 or so on an entry DSLR to pull it out maybe once a month vs a 1020 that you have every day in your hand for hours? It is a no brainer.
Yes I am that person that keeps a tripod, UV filters, 3 lenses and a Nikon in my car. (except in extreme heat). But not everyone is me and for what the 1020 does it is simply a beast.
If the 1520 can be on par with the 1020 in regards to quality etc, it is nothing but pure win.
9. SleepingOz (unregistered)
Even so, the pictures are really good.
11. TechBizJP08 (Posts: 495; Member since: 25 Mar 2013)
Common, seriously? That's samples only, don't be such a baby. It was photographed by a professional. What do you expect the outcome?
33. Bernoulli (Posts: 2299; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
Iso sets the balance of natural light, at night time you want a higher number for the iso, not lower, and in none of the lumia series can the iso be 2000, it's either 1,600 3,200 or 4000, so please don't talk out of your ass.
41. Penny (Posts: 1385; Member since: 04 Feb 2011)
I've taken shots with my Lumia 928 with ISO 100 and 2s exposure without a tripod. As long as you can use something to stabilize the phone, like holding it in place on a table, or railing, or on the ground, you can keep it stable enough to utilize those slow shutter speeds.
But yes, this would blur any moving subjects in the picture, so it works best in a still scene or when you want to intentionally blur like people do with car tail lights.
3. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2018; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)
Geeeezuusssss!!!! Awesome pix #teamNokia
31. rantao333 (Posts: 304; Member since: 21 May 2013)
forget about android, here i come, nokia!
8. SleepingOz (unregistered)
And millions are picking the GNIII over this, everyday!
20. papss (unregistered)
You mean WILL pick the note 3.. The 1520 isn't out yet so customers aren't yet doing so.
28. saffant (Posts: 242; Member since: 04 Jul 2011)
Regardless of whether it was out or not lol. People will still pick Note 3 instead.
35. Bernoulli (Posts: 2299; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
Nah, not many of us want sammys cheap plastics
37. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
lol dillusion....may i remind you samsung is the most popular smartphone manufacturer in the world fanboy??
45. Bernoulli (Posts: 2299; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
No that's apple, all of their phones are smartphones, but just like sammys line up, just because they're popular doesn't mean they're the best.
49. moolotovzz (Posts: 24; Member since: 12 Mar 2013)
it is hard to believe a person who has android 18 on his pic.. NO HATING THOUGH
50. SleepingOz (unregistered)
What I meant is that they could have wait a little more to pick the lumia instead, like the few remaining nokia fanboys are doing. But yup, you're right. Many will still pick the GNIII over it, even when it'll be out.
19. rd_nest (Posts: 1093; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
Nobody expected otherwise. That's what fanboys do even when a competitor has a vastly superior product and literally defined the catagory.
There would have been no 1520 if it wasn't for Note-series.
7. woodshop20 (Posts: 459; Member since: 14 Sep 2013)
Though those are great photos, I'll wait for phonearena to do an actual review. Manufacturer sponsored photos can be a bit dodgy (e.g. the iPhone 5s photo of a jellyfish underwater when the phone isn't waterproof).
I like how Nokia has focused less on the camera this time and more on the user experience with (finally) up to date specs.
21. papss (unregistered)
If you are waiting on PA for photo samples you will be disappointed. They fudge up anything wp related and it's somehow worse then other less superior cameras. I just hope robot ray doesn't do the review.
12. Diazene (Posts: 129; Member since: 01 May 2013)
not bad, but certainly not amazing, I was hoping for sharper and less noisy pictures
hope they can fix it with a software update
17. maverick786us (Posts: 138; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)
I am bit disappointed with soft images. I was having too many expectation from its camera
13. GeekMovement (Posts: 1898; Member since: 09 Sep 2011)
Best windows phone hands down. One of the best smartphones as well.
15. maverick786us (Posts: 138; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)
I am bit disappointed with soft images. I was having too many expectation from its camera
22. valapsp (Posts: 491; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)
I love this phone. I have to choose a carrier in a month so can someone tell me what's wrong with AT&T? Should I go with T-Mobile or Verizon? But the latter two will not have the 1520.
39. clevername (Posts: 1435; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)
in my experience only thing wrong with ATT is price. coverage and data speeds were always great for me here in southern california
46. Immolate (Posts: 296; Member since: 17 Jun 2011)
AT&T is pricey like Verizon and the second place carrier for network, but #2 has become pretty good of late and no question that they are the better pick for phone selection unless you're a Droid guy.
26. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)
how can I get details of pictures ? (ISO , shutter speed vs )
27. Smokin (Posts: 120; Member since: 10 Oct 2013)
That is awesome! that's even better than the Z1 imo
36. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3427; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
No words... Just impressive...
@Chris: I want a comparison of 1520 and Z1 cameras. :)
43. freebee269 (Posts: 529; Member since: 10 Aug 2012)
not gonna lie, when i seen that first picture of the buildings surrounding the park the first words that jumped to my mind was holy sh*t. that's impressive!
44. GrapeEyes (Posts: 248; Member since: 01 Sep 2013)
I have had enough of these android zombies!
It is simple. android has no charactor, warmth, emotion. It is all over the place.
The only reason why the Windows operating system on Nokia has not already destroyed android and ios is because microsoft played evil and put every update and improvement on hold so it can buy the Nokia mobile division on the cheap!!
If the deal does go through. You will see some incredible updates that will blow android and ios out the water!!!
Microsoft is greedy just like Apple, they both will do anything to make as much money as possible! but what goes around, comes around.
I know most Nokia customers are angry with Microsoft but trust me, if the deals goes through? massive mobile operating improvements will come in 2014.
Nokia will rise again.
52. LumiaLover (Posts: 160; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)
Mr Elop has done quite well out of all of this too. The whole situation stinks, but consumers will win in the end because we will continue to see amazing devices with unrivaled build quality and hopefully a much improved WP OS.
47. AceStorm1249 (Posts: 14; Member since: 16 Feb 2013)
if it wasn't for the lack of many apps i would go for the lumia
51. LumiaLover (Posts: 160; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)
I hope they produce a 5" version of the 1520. This is a lovely device but it's just a bit too big for me. I have L925 which I love, but I was considering going down in size to the iPhone 5S, as I like to type one handed. The 1520 certainly caught my attention though. Hopefully next year I will have a tough choice to make between the iPhone 6 and the Lumia 5" version of this phone .