x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Firmware update for Nokia 808 PureView doesn't seem to bring anything new to the table

Firmware update for Nokia 808 PureView doesn't seem to bring anything new to the table

Posted: , by Alan F.

Tags :

Firmware update for Nokia 808 PureView doesn't seem to bring anything new to the table
The Nokia 808 PureView is well known for its 41MP camera which makes people forget that it is a smartphone first and foremost. The device has just received a firmware update from Nokia which, at 420MB (via PC), had those owning the phone hopeful that some thing good was inside. It's the same principle that makes you think that a better present is inside a larger box than a smaller one.

The Nokia 808 PureView has received a firmware update

The Nokia 808 PureView has received a firmware update

The new software version is 113.010.1508 and so far, those who have downloaded the update have found....absolutely nothing new. Sure, it's a let down for those were hoping for new features. This is not to say that some improvements haven't been made that make the phone run faster or smoother. In case you've forgotten, the Nokia 808 PureView is powered by Symbian.

If you own the Nokia 808 PureView and have updated your model, let us know if you have found anything new on your phone after installing the update. Simply type your comments in the box below.

source: PureViewclub, MyNokiaBlog via IntoMobile

51 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 05 Jan 2013, 16:17 10

1. Izzy_V (Posts: 216; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)


The phone for people that don't know they can get a good smartphone and camera instead of a good camera and a crappy phone.

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 16:19 25

2. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


Error no mate, symbian may not be as eye catching but it does everything needed and more

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 17:13 7

5. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


"...it does everything needed and more"

Depending on needs and different people have different needs.
Symbian does less than Android.

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 17:29 10

8. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Symbian may not have as many apps as android (and we all should know app count isn't everything, and a good system doesn't need to rely so heavily on apps), but it is technically more capable than android. There's still stuff a 2010-era Symbian can do that even devices like the Nexus4 and Note2 can't do. It might help if android weren't running on a virtual machine, so it could unlock all the power the OEMs put under it. If Symbian were put on one of those beasts it would be staggeringly great.

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 17:45 1

10. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


"Symbian may not have as many apps as android (and we all should know app count isn't everything, and a good system doesn't need to rely so heavily on apps), but it is technically more capable than android."

Who says that I was talking about the apps?!

"There's still stuff a 2010-era Symbian can do that even devices like the Nexus4 and Note2 can't do."

I think you should decide, you are talking about devices or about operating systems?!

"If Symbian were put on one of those beasts it would be staggeringly great."

What was if it was blah blah blah... but we have what we have and since it is not installed on one of those beasts...

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 17:53 5

11. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


I agree that Symbian may run faster than Android but even if Symbian was on the "super duper" hardware it still has less functionality than Android. Fact.

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 19:06 8

12. weinerslav (Posts: 126; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


Lol, I left my last year top of the line android phone for the 808 and was the best thing I could have done, not that I don't like android but the 808 suits me best. Maybe it has less functionality but a lot of things just work better

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 02:01 2

18. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


I have posted a few points about android vs. Symbian, but I'm too bored to do it again. Bing (or google, or whatever) an unbiased source for android vs. Symbian. Symbian's biggest crutches were display resolution, screen size, and Nokia putting specs closer to minimums than maximum - not saying they're underpowered, just that they could easily have taken some stronger components and been stupendously good.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 05:55

23. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


We are talking about Operating System (software) but for some reasons you are again mixing software with hardware...

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:00

29. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


give me a few examples

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 21:50 1

17. steelicon (Posts: 318; Member since: 02 Apr 2011)


Some OEM should buy out Symbian or revive Symbian UIQ, fix it properly and put it in a Google Nexus 4 (LG) or Samsung Galaxy Note II (GT-N7100) level hardware or better.

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 19:15 6

14. Omar-BHR95 (Posts: 184; Member since: 23 Dec 2012)


SURE BUT IT HAS ALMOST EVERYTHING NEEDED
1.Best Camera ( better than all Droid Cameras)
2.Easy to use OS
3.Important apps such as Whatsapp , Twiiter , Skype , Viber , Facebook , PhotoEditor , Video Editor , Youtube Downloader and many more
4.Best TBT Navigation ( offline )

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 05:56 1

24. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


"Best Camera ( better than all Droid Cameras)"

Symbian doesn't have camera because it is software not hardware!

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 10:37 1

45. Omar-BHR95 (Posts: 184; Member since: 23 Dec 2012)


SQUEEZE ME !!!!!

IM TALKING ABOUT THE 808 PUREVIEW AND ALSO REMEMBER THE HTC TITAN 2 THAT HAD A 16 MP CAMERA AND THEY HAVE PUT IT ON WP OS , YEA BECAUSE ANDROID OS COULDNT HANDLE THAT MUCH MP

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 21:47 5

16. steelicon (Posts: 318; Member since: 02 Apr 2011)


No. You still cannot have that 41MP sensor and PureView Pro technology. No FM Transmitter. No 3.5mm AV out. Poor battery life. Poor multitasking. Poor power management. Android is just a kid out of kindergarten. Try again after your Android beta testing in like 5 more years until Android catches up with Symbian.

FYI : I like Android, but claiming that it is better than Symbian is just getting way ahead of exaggeration.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 05:58 1

25. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


Do you feel any difference between software and hardware?! And if you feel do you realize that I'm talking about software (Symbian) not hardware?!

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:20 1

31. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


Android OS is not bad, but simply not as good as Symbian. It's less performance-optimized (because of VM), more battery hungry, fragmented, has security issues, even official store is full of trojan and other malware apps. Another problem of Android is, that they don't have OEM which is on par or better than Nokia, when it comes to HW.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:25

34. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


This is LINUX, what do you expect. Freedom. A full OS not halfbaked like Symbian.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:42 1

36. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


On the other hand, Android is just a halfbaked Linux.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:45

37. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Way much better than Symbian and other OS ....

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:50

39. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


And btw, Maemo/MeeGo are actually Linux, yet they are better optimized than Android. The reason is that they doesn't use crappy VM interprated applications.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 10:09

42. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


don't use*

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 17:18 2

7. smallworld (Posts: 488; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)


Denial...

posted on 05 Jan 2013, 19:08

13. weinerslav (Posts: 126; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


Or fact

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 03:06 3

19. ChiX017 (Posts: 308; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)


Thats absolutely ignorant, common!

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:24

33. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Very true, what a crappy phone, even my N958.GB is much better than this huge ugly bulky phone.

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 07:47 2

38. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


Explain....not gonna let you post such cap and not get called on it

So explain

Ohh and don't say half baked as that's all you know how to say

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 09:19

40. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


You and we all know why, it's an N series and the 8800

posted on 06 Jan 2013, 11:34 3

48. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


your so full of it, your tragic kid

explain how the n95 is better? come on i want a real answer no dodging the question troll

we all know your just a hate filled jealous kid who dont like other options that has advantages over your precious android so you troll

p.s you fail at trolling too

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 04:23 1

50. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 4002; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


I bet, according to him, more buttons means it's more better...
Troll, N95 is a phone of the yester-years...808 might look dumb and heavy, but N95 can't and will never be better than 808.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories