x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




FCC chairman would sign off on Dish Network's bid to become a wireless carrier under one condition

0. phoneArena 21 Nov 2012, 12:30 posted on

There is no question that Dish Network Chairman Charlie Egren wants to have his company become a wireless carrier even going as far as attempting to buy pre-paid carrier MetroPCS; FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski says he would support Dish Network as a wireless operator under one condition...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 12:38 2

1. toiletcleaner (Posts: 214; Member since: 10 Oct 2012)


Just shut up and take my money ;)

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 17:48

13. MeoCao (unregistered)


I think Dish can get around the problem by building many smaller towers with lower power.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 13:21 4

2. lyndon420 (Posts: 1787; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)


Agreed...take my money-especially if Google gets involved.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 15:59 2

9. MAXXtreme007 (Posts: 22; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


I don't care a ton about Dish, but if Google is involved, I'm IN!!! Google is AWESOME!!!

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 13:44

3. dorianb (Posts: 429; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


"FCC Chairman wants Dish to lower its power levels to avoid interference with other networks."

How low we talking & what are the drawbacks? Beside obvious penetration into buildings & the like.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 14:38

4. Reluctant_Human (Posts: 867; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


Penetration and distance. This would mean a whole lot more cell sites and skyrocketing the cost of service.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 15:17 2

5. tward291 (Posts: 559; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


i would love this free tv free wirless service. well not free but ill get one hell of a discount. not to mention internet. i wonder how low the fcc want to go.if its to low to push up cost there better off with the partnership with tmobile. or sell there spectrum to att. profit sharing baby

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 15:44

6. cheeseycheeser (Posts: 399; Member since: 24 Mar 2011)


Imagine if T-Mobile buys metro, then Dish and Google team up with T-Metro to make a super carrier that already has great overage with rock bottom prices and all the new nexuses!!

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 15:52

7. DaNTRoN (Posts: 135; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)


A lower power would stretch the wave length making it longer. Now I'm probably wrong but long wavelengths travel father and penetrate deeper. The only thing i see as being a problem with this, keeping in mind i could be wrong, but the only draw back would be less data transmitted per wave. Thus lowering data speed.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 15:59

8. kg4icg (Posts: 69; Member since: 18 May 2008)


Lowering power does not make the frequency wavelength any longer. What it does is makes it harder for receivers to puck up signals at longer distance making static more susceptible.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 16:29 1

10. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


I'm not a ridiculously huge fan of Google or the thought that the company will perpetually be this benevolent force in the tech industry (we don't know who who have control of all that information as time goes forward). Still, if any company is going to do wireless as it should be done, it would be Google. No contracts, high speed internet partially for a profit, but to also catch the United States up to the rest of the world for network size and strength. We have companies like AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint that are indeed tech companies, but they are so saddled with old business that they don't innovate. Google would force them to make drastic changes to the usual. If they do this and the network is open, I'm going to move myself over to their network. Even if it isn't the best starting out. I'm tired of these cellular companies absolutely screwing people...

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 16:40

11. downphoenix (Posts: 2416; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)


Google should buy out T-Mobile.

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 16:56 1

12. MorePhonesThanNeeded (Posts: 645; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


I don't understand the FCC, why should Dish lower their power levels to avoid interference with other networks such as those used by the FAA and the Military? Hold on these two should be using the best possible frequencies and devices and if they are susceptible to interference then they are using garbage ass technology and need to upgrade to something much better and more stable. FCC is so retarded, why auction off spectrum if the companies who have to use it are stuck having to pay exorbitant amounts of cash to build towers all over the damn place to keep their signal a live whilst the FAA and Military get a free pass to basically squat on old tech which can be messed with by high power equipment on a frequency close by...these are the cheap guys running the country right there. FAA and Military should have some of the best equipment out there, but according to the FCC chairman they obviously do not.

Dish will probably bite the bullet on this and shake hands with the Goog and go all out, not sure how Dish will profit from this as Goog will make buckets off the adverts but Dish would have to get their money somehow...customers...!

posted on 21 Nov 2012, 19:20

14. tward291 (Posts: 559; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


dish should just take that spectrum and offer wireless service for tablets and laptops.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories