Eric Schmidt says Android will close the billion devices mark towards year-end
0. phoneArena 16 Apr 2013, 09:06 posted on
Eric Schmidt is currently having a fireside chat a the Dive into Mobile conference, and he brought the G1 to stage to show it still works, spitting out some statistics on the incredible Android growth afterwards...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Wow! Android is getting bigger! I love you Android!
By the way, wish all the best to Windows Phone and BlackBerry, keep the apps and games coming! :)
12. omar300 (Posts: 209; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)
i dont know about blackberry but windows is defiantly a great platform.
it can be called androids step brother.
i hope android brings live tiles sort of thing soon.
i like how person can see messages missed calls without opening an app through live tiles, but my complain is that they dont have a good music player. and because its closed system no one can make one.
THATS WHY ANDROID IS BEST! :D
15. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Hey me too, that's what I thought! I also hope that Android brings live tiles soon!
But, we also can say that Windows Phone and BlackBerry is Android's stepbrothers! :)
2. maier9900 (Posts: 272; Member since: 17 Dec 2011)
Im glad iOS is not open source. It would bring in all the malware possible, just like android currently does. Sad. Oooh, and if iOS was open source for all the manufacturers (like android is) it would've reached 2 billion devices long ago.
9. taikucing (unregistered)
that's why Mac OS X got virus last year asked for kaspersky's help. Kaspersky also said that mac security is 10 years behind microsoft.
Google this: "Apple Strips Mac OS X Website of Virus Statements" or "Mac security is 10 years behind Microsoft".
I wonder why Linux has the biggest market share in servers & supercomputers, not only because it's free, powerful, more stable, but also its security is though.
Yeah dude, open source is not bad. People can contribute for the better OS. The browser I'm using now is open source (firefox). It's better, faster, safer, more features than IE & safari. I can't Ctrl + Enter in safari, it sucks.
10. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)
ur dumb as hell lmao i got 3 macs and 1 being very old never got a virus running OS tiger its years ahead Microsoft in the pc field win 8 has how many virus over 10000 and that's being nice come on dude u hate apple y r u mad at them
13. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
2 billion devices!!... Mate your a joke...yes because a third of the world's population would have a iPhone or ipad.... Get real mate and stop being a pointless isheep
4. addicted2088 (Posts: 53; Member since: 25 Sep 2012)
"As long as memory requirements don't massively increase, these devices will trickle down."
Considering both ICS and JB increased RAM usage, which was already quite high thanks to the Java core, I can see RAM requirements increasing even more, making low-end devices a poor experience. Compare that to OS like Symbian and MeeGo where RAM usage was low and multitasking was awesome, and I wish Google finds a way to reduce RAM usage and increase performance. :/
6. taikucing (unregistered)
I think that's caused by too much bloatwares that occupy the memory, or the apps are heavily skinned. Uninstall the bloatwares or install the custom ROM which takes less memory. The qwerty BB OS7 has 512 MB RAM, sometime BB freezes, takes long time to boot. As a comparison, my phone with 512 MB RAM & JB still runs fine, still has 200 MB free memory, no lag problem. BB Z10 takes a lot of memory too IMO, that's why it has 2 GB RAM
7. addicted2088 (Posts: 53; Member since: 25 Sep 2012)
I have a Nexus device so there isn't any bloatware installed. It's a fact that stuff takes more RAM on Android (especially when enabled with hardware acceleration, Google points that out). And the main reason is the use of Java. I'd like to point out that I'm not talking about how much RAM my system is taking at any point, rather how much an app takes compared to other OS versions. And it's quite a lot (the settings app itself takes 40MB, that's too much).
8. addicted2088 (Posts: 53; Member since: 25 Sep 2012)
Oh, and as for your OS running quite well on 512MB, it's because while I curse the high RAM usage, Android's system of clearing out memory when needed, caching etc makes it otherwise a good system. It's just that at any moment the number of apps that are actively paused in the background and can be resumed is low due to high RAM usage, before Android starts killing them. Blackberry (and Symbian too) had no setting for closing older apps as new ones were opened, so meeting freezes and lags were much more common.
11. Aeires (unregistered)
I think the point he was trying to make was people in those parts of the world aren't likely to be buying high end games and whatnot. What they will be primarily doing is using their phones for calls, texts, and other ways to communicate, which shouldn't take that much memory use.
5. porter_ (Posts: 8; Member since: 15 Apr 2013)
He was referring to one billion Android activations, not one billion Android apps.
Edit - Ah, headline changed now
14. Edmund (Posts: 656; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
I'm one of those billion, yet haven't used android (actively) in over 2 years. Schmidt is dreaming if he thinks affordable handsets like the Lumia 520, 620, and 720 won't have an impact on sales of mid-range android models.