Drama in the airwaves: Verizon one step closer to buying AWS spectrum
0. phoneArena 10 Jul 2012, 07:32 posted on
The drama surrounding the American wireless spectrum continues. According to the latest rumor, Verizon has gotten the FCC's thumbs-up in its quest of purchasing some AWS spectrum...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. maxican16 (Posts: 363; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
Now if only VZW were not encrypting bootloaders...
2. Knicknevin (Posts: 135; Member since: 18 Mar 2011)
and screwing everyone on the cost of data...pretty soon, they will gouge us not on only cost per MB (likely around $2 or $3) but also surgcharge for video and music as opposed to text.
5. kaintae (Posts: 57; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
It's basic economics. Bandwidth is not unlimited. The carriers have to do what makes sense to remain profitable. the companies with a smaller customer base can afford to offer "unlimited" data (read the fine print) because other than that and low prices, there's no other appeal to join them. You don't hear people talking about how great Sprints coverage is! If the bigger carriers did that, their networks would crash and burn. So instead of getting on the bigger companies for "screwing" you, you should be picking on the nerds who find streaming 20GB of data a month through their phones necessary, thus forcing the carriers to "gouge" the prices in order to maintain reasonable service quality.
7. CRICKETownz (Posts: 980; Member since: 24 Oct 2009)
first person i've seen that actually defends logical business sense instead of selfishly complaining as a consumer that high quality services should be offered for pennies...+1.
3. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4165; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
I know Verizon is expensive.
In life you get what you pay for. I have had 4G LTE everywhere I have been with Verizon. If 4G is not available then I have SOLID 3G. That is from EAST to WEST coast. (Yes I have to travel a lot.) On Sprint I was fine in the "city" but in the "suburbs" I had less than stellar coverage & that is being nice. Now if I was in the woods, mountains or the farm, then forget about.
I give props for the way Verizon keeps maintaining & upgrading their already phenomenal 4G LTE coverage. I can't knock them because I am getting what I pay for. I have to say this, Verizon's coverage is the Ferrari, Rolex, Diamond, or Palace of mobile carriers & I can truly say this, they are the BEST hands down. There is just no dispute.
It's money well spent if you want speed (4G LTE) & coverage. I am not disappointed at all. Most people in life can't say they have the best car, the best house, the best jewelry, or even the best food to eat. I can truly say I have the BEST carrier in the US, & that is Verizon.
Who can argue with that?
6. bolaG (Posts: 468; Member since: 15 Aug 2011)
Agreed. VZW is the best for the money.
Coverage practically everywhere exept some rural areas in the mid-west. The largest LTE network, Motorola awesomeness, great coverage, and pretty dam good customer service.
8. BattleBrat (Posts: 1090; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
Yes, the RAZR is quite the beast, combine it with a Lapdock and a wireless controller, THEN YOURE HAVING FUN!
all at 4g speeds.
4. Immolate (Posts: 285; Member since: 17 Jun 2011)
Saw an article this morning that 32 Democrats from the house are pushing the Obama Administration to block this deal. Justice reports to the POTUS. Who is hurt when Verizon is stronger? AT&T and Sprint to name two. As mentioned, T-mo has been convinced to participate in order to give the FCC cover to approve.