Director of National Intelligence says PRISM reports "contain numerous inaccuracies"
0. phoneArena 06 Jun 2013, 22:15 posted on
Everyone seems to be scrambling on this one, and more and more it looks like we should be suspicious of the reports by The Washington Post and The Guardian. Not only have most of the companies named in The Washington Post report about PRISM data collection denied involvement in any government program; now, the Director of National Intelligence has come out to say the reports "contain numerous inaccuracies"...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. jroc74 (Posts: 3446; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)
"The unauthorized disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans."
I will reword this as:
"The unauthorized disclosure of information about this program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans."
I said in the other article....it being classified Top Secret....whoever is behind this leak is in a world of trouble...not talking about whether all this is right or wrong...just that their work protocols say this should have never been leaked, released, allowed to leave the building, etc.
Regardless of whether we think its right or wrong....this was classified info.
2. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 4708; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
"Regardless of whether we think its right or wrong....this was classified info."
And so, we should blindly accept the classification and shut the f*ck up? Are you aware that classification has been abused in the past? The only thing separating us from Adolph and Josef is the light of day that exposes blatant abuse of the 10 amendments to the US Constitution. Just this week, we lost the 4th amendment. How far does it have to go before you admit there has been an abuse of power?
5. jroc74 (Posts: 3446; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)
Like I said.....not talking about whether its right or wrong....just based on whatever the person's job was....this should have never been leaked.
If ppl are upset about this....they would be surprised about the other stuff they dont know about.
3. madpiyal (Posts: 107; Member since: 11 Feb 2013)
"to protect our nation from a wide variety of threats"-- hah. What he meant is to raise wars and to convert all the American citizens to robots.
6. Zero0 (Posts: 533; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)
Confused. This leak risks security, but he wants declassification?