x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Did LG just pull a Samsung? LG Optimus G specs review and comparison vs Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC One X

0. phoneArena 18 Sep 2012, 02:10 posted on

If LG has managed to finally escape the stigmata of subpar cameras and wimpy loudspeakers of its flagship handsets with the Optimus G, it has every chance to turn what is already the best-spec'd Android phone on paper, into a truly formidable device that others, including Samsung, will have to look up to this holiday season...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 07:12 11

1. wendygarett (unregistered)

The galaxy s3 is the winner when it come to its sexy design :-)

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 07:32 45

10. thebest (Posts: 231; Member since: 08 Jul 2012)

actually, the samsung galaxy s3 doesn't look as good as the htc one x, the new optimus G also looks good and simple,the material also looks good, the build quality looks better than the galaxy s3 build quality
if i am asked to choose any one of the 3 phones, i would choose the galaxy s3, but htc one x is the winner when it comes to sexy design

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 07:48 13

17. noriya (Posts: 12; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)

i don't think gs3 had a sexy design,i think it like alien design.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:05 6

28. u-suck-more (Posts: 529; Member since: 26 Aug 2011)

are u on crack?

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:09 14

31. maverick786us (Posts: 150; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)

The design of this smartphone is far better than Galaxy S3

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:18 6

36. pokharkarsaga (Posts: 405; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)

LG Optimus G phone of the year 2012.it straight away beats Samsung galaxy s3 & HTC one X in specs& perfomance.i don't think people will sacrifice specs and performance for design.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:20 4

37. Angkor (Posts: 108; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)

Is it time for a "drop test"? against iPhone, HTC X, Moto Razr, and Galaxy S3.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:22 6

39. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

It looks like a larger, more modern Prada...

...oh wait...

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:54 4

55. kartik4u98 (Posts: 511; Member since: 19 May 2012)

why do you think so? After handling s3 I loved the overall feel and look of the smartphone..
P.s- I do agree that I hated the design when saw on the computer..

posted on 18 Sep 2012, 02:45 3

118. doejon (Posts: 403; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)

phone of the year is galaxy note 2

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 12:14 2

77. XperiaUser (unregistered)

but i think galaxy has a wrost design among all . if i want round corner then we have htc one x and for sharp corner we have Optimus G. and i luv its design.
Galaxy S3 -- Bulky design , designed for human but not from the earth

posted on 30 Aug 2012, 06:21 2

106. RiceKnight (Posts: 5; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)

Well I'd have to disagree, although I can see how it is a chicks design :)

I kinda like this this LG phone, but to be honest that might just be me being in love with the 320 ^_^;

posted on 18 Sep 2012, 03:39 1

120. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)

i know you're being sarcastic this time around wendy.....lol got everybody believing you hahahaha

posted on 09 Oct 2012, 02:37

130. Raymond_htc (Posts: 430; Member since: 06 Apr 2012)

if you call The S3 sexy, i don't think you know whats the definition of ''style''...

suppose you're a galaxy S3 owner.....

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 07:14 9

2. mercorp (Posts: 1040; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)

Peope who bought the optimus 4x hd will really be dissapointed...
Xiaomi should better watch out.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 07:39 6

15. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

xiaomi is a china only phone.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 07:59

24. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1543; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)

It will also possibly come to Europe
I imagine that they won't maintain the prices though.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:05

26. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)

they will be disappointed... :/

and I still won't buy it until JB isn't released. i don't care if they announce it, i want it to come!

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:09 1

32. MeoCao (unregistered)

Xiaomi will obviously use the same tactics as early Japanese and Korean companies: use domestic market to make quantity and make profits in developed market.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:28 1

43. Angkor (Posts: 108; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)

Xiaomi is not only phone made by Chinese company there are Lenovo, Oppo, BBK, Haier, Kejian, Konka, Meizu, Ningbo Bird, TCL, and ZTE and more.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 08:44 4

51. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

Im not going to buy it unless they promise unlocked bootloaders, leaked updates, and fast official update times. LG has possibly the worst update record of all major Android manufacturers.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 09:21 2

62. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)

that is why i want a nexus, or a flagship phone.
sgs line gets updated... sensation, desire and one x gets updates but are slow... lg: crap.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 10:09 1

65. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

im still steamed that my stock android "with google" Tegra2 tablet has never seen anything past 3.1 officially. Thats just ridiculous.. ITS STOCK CODE!! lol.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 15:33

86. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)

....No one promises leaked updates.

There is such thing as public tester programs like HTC Elevate where a few get early access to RUUs and the like, but usually leaks are hard to come by.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 16:32 1

88. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

samsung has a website they leak all their updates to.www.samsungfirmwares.com.

They let XDA test them :)

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 17:28

90. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)

That's not an official Samsung site, and that's a parked domain with nothing on it.

Once again, no OEM has official leaks. That's why they're called leaks. HTC has it's Elevate program, Motorola has their soak tests, Samsung probably has internal testing. More likely than not, they all overlook the leaking of firmware to dev communities as long as nothing meant to stay secret for good reason is leaked.

Leaks happen because there is a big enough community that there are liasons that can get in touch with people on the inside to get early access.

posted on 28 Aug 2012, 21:52 1

94. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

i didnt say it was an official samsung site.
Apparently they had a name change. Here is the active site.


It is a repository for all sorts of unreleased firmware direct from samsung. Yes, they do their internal testing, but they also release it to the wild. Didnt you ever wonder where all that crazy development for samsung phones came from? There is all sorts of test roms released by samsung to the community. It was the communities response and their ability to make sammy's software better that convinced Sammy to hire people direct from XDA and Cyanogenmod to work on their software... including Steve Klondik.. aka Cyanogen himself.

you speak in finalities without proof. There is no such thing as "no OEM does X". Unless you have direct proof, you shouldnt think that way. Samsung IS VERY VERY modder friendly. That has been a large reason for their success while others like HTC who USED to be very modder friendly closed the doors. They are all reopening their doors slowly but surely to compete with samsung for Modder love... which they've had the bulk of for a while.

posted on 29 Aug 2012, 00:16

99. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)

Yes, and xda has all sorts of unreleased firmware direct from HTC. The HTC One X had at least the 1.27 leak, 2.05, 2.15, and an early release of the 2.17 firmwares. What's your point?

No, you shouldn't speak in finalities without proof, because no company has the official policy of leaking internal firmware being tested. You are claiming that it is for some OEMs. Unless you can produce proof that says OEMs do, your argument is invalid. Samsung didn't get a dev community because they leaked firmware, it's because they kept unlocked bootloaders out of the box. It is a far more reasonable statement to say that the reason why firmware gets leaked is because there is such a big dev community. More devs means more people that can try to communicate with people inside the company, and gain access to firmware meant exclusively for internal use.

posted on 29 Aug 2012, 06:19 1

101. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

they are not unlocked of the box.. they are just incredibly easy to unlock.
I've been using a samsung phone for over 2 years now.. trust me, they leaked the crap out of their updates on purpose to make the loudest complainers happy when the SGS1 wasnt getting basic updates.. all of a sudden the flood gates opened and there was a new "leaked" rom from Samsung nearly every week or 2 for a long time for the SGS1. Now they do it for pretty much every major phone and minor phone they have. Your talking 4 firmware updates.. im talking hundreds. Heck there have been 10 in the last few months just for the SGS1 which hasnt seen an "official" update since Android 2.2 over a year ago and is over 2 years old now. The SGS3 has had dozens already this month. Heck, unofficially its had 4.1 for a good bit now. The SGS2 has had unofficial 4.04 for quite some time, and the SGS1 got unofficial 2.3.6 upgrades ages ago.

Samsung has an unofficial policy of leaking their stuff out to the community, and has for quite some time. Its a way of free advertising by word of mouth. ROMs are made off this constant influx of releases which keeps the ever growing communities in XDA quite happy and talkative. Some test roms are wonderful, and some are not. They all have slight tweaks from the previous leak.
Anyways, I think your just continually trying to split hairs with me to argue for no reason. You keep trying to tell me how things are... without any proof. I'm telling you what I see and have found, with proof.

posted on 29 Aug 2012, 20:37

104. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)

Uh, I managed to flash a Galaxy S1 and S2 without ever jumping through anything that required unlocking a bootloader. There's a flashcounter but that's it.

Then that's great, but that's not an official testing program. More likely than not, it's Samsung turning a blind eye to someone who is leaking test releases on the inside.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories