Despite concentrating on LTE build out, Sprint will spend $200 million to upgrade its 3G pipeline
0. phoneArena posted on 08 Nov 2012, 19:56
With Sprint's LTE still with a limited footprint, the carrier has decided to budget $200 million to improve its 3G network, especially with the addition of a large number of new subscribers over the last few months; the $200 million is going to improve the speed of its 3G pipeline...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Mark.J.Linskiy posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:14 7 1
I think Sprint is making some smart decisions which will benefit the consumer, such as myself. Hope all goes well, with LTE and 3G.
2. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:15 0 0
will boost and virgin mobile 3g have faster speeds from this or not?
15. tuminatr posted on 09 Nov 2012, 00:16 0 0
had to say exactley if sprint put any restriction on virgin customers but concidering they use the sprint network it will probibly help
19. Contreramanjaro posted on 09 Nov 2012, 13:36 0 0
Boost and Virgin have a lower priority on the network but any improvements should help them out as well.
3. mas11 posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:18 2 1
That says a lot about their current 3G network. While AT&T and Verizon are pouring hundreds of millions into Late to make those networks as good as their 3G networks Sprint is playing catch up.
8. wumberpeb posted on 08 Nov 2012, 21:07 1 1
Sprint hasn't had the luxury of money the past few years, what did you expect? They've also had roughly half the subscribers as the other 2. Of course they're playing catchup
11. lsutigers posted on 08 Nov 2012, 22:15 2 1
This $200 is not all Sprint is investing in it's 3G network. This is IN ADDITION to Network Vision improvements and NV brings all new equipment with increased capacity to 3G as well as 4G LTE. In these last 2 years it's taking Sprint to upgrade ALL 3G and 4G LTE, which is faster than both AT&T and VZW for similar coverage areas, they are investing billions in their networks.
4. Kaze105 posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:19 0 0
If this upgrade is dont fairly soon or at the longest within 1 year, I think its a smart choice for Sprint. Having insanely bad 3G speed and coverage is the reason why I stay away from them. If they can at least give me Verizon 3G speeds, I will easily change to them.
16. tuminatr posted on 09 Nov 2012, 00:20 1 0
depends where you live, in Minnesota, North Dakota where they have coverage and Wisconsin they are good but I was in Charlotte North Carolina last year and holy balls did the network suck
5. KFear posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:32 1 0
A good move for Sprint. The problem is that roll-outs are ungodly slow for the carrier. That might have to do with budgets, however. I'm sticking with Sprint the whole way...but, man, i'm tired of "almost" and then just stopping there.
6. theBankRobber posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:52 1 3
Please, got a email about them building my network for better this and better that but still got 2 damn bars in my house. Don't matter how they sell it, Sprint still is a crappy network.
7. scsa852k posted on 08 Nov 2012, 20:56 1 3
Good, because their 3G speed is almost non-existent.
10. johnbftl posted on 08 Nov 2012, 22:15 1 2
I mentioned their data network speeds being an issue a while back in another article and someone told me I didn't know what I was talking about. Apparently now that phone arena makes it news all of a sudden everyone has something to say about how bad Sprint's network is. I used to be a territory rep for Sprint handling indirect retail channels like Best Buy and Radioshack. I know a lot about a lot of their issues.
12. lsutigers posted on 08 Nov 2012, 22:20 1 0
It's not bad in all markets, in fact, Sprint's 3G runs over 1mbps+ in many markets but the ones that have issues with slower speeds are being worked on, as well as the ones that don't have speed issues as they are re-building their entire network 3G and 4G LTE nationwide.
13. ojdidit84 posted on 08 Nov 2012, 22:36 1 0
No, there used to be a lot of people being vocal about Sprint's network issues. I was one of them. 3G data went to hell shortly after the first Evo and Epic came to Sprint. At one point my 3G DL speeds wouldn't reach over 50kbps. Left and went to Verizon.
Sprint's making all the right moves, albeit quite a bit behind the big 2 but they haven't exactly had the cash to barely maintain their networks, let alone make many improvements.
17. wumberpeb posted on 09 Nov 2012, 00:39 3 1
Hold up guys, we got an expert here. Indirect sales rep must also mean RF Engineer
20. EvoHero posted on 11 Nov 2012, 19:40 0 0
Those guys have access to much more information about the network as a whole than the engineers.
I'm sorry, what were YOUR qualifications again?
14. Googlethis posted on 08 Nov 2012, 23:15 2 1
Good work sprint I like your service keep it up
18. GeekMovement posted on 09 Nov 2012, 11:48 0 1
If they support the west coast a bit more that would be great.