x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • "Crystal clear" Samsung Galaxy F leaked again, this time in its full glory

"Crystal clear" Samsung Galaxy F leaked again, this time in its full glory

Posted: , by Chris P.

Tags :

The supposedly metal-clad upcoming Samsung Galaxy F has been all over the place this last month, and by now most of us have reason enough to believe that an official launch is imminent. Not to be confused with the Samsung Galaxy S5 LTE-A, the Galaxy F is believed to be both a higher-spec'd version and one in a more premium shell. This last part is corroborated by the latest, official-looking render of the Galaxy F in "crystal clear", courtesy of @evleaks.

This is not the first time we see what the alleged Galaxy F looks like, and we've even seen parts of the crystal clear version before, but now you can bask in its full glory. Once again, the phone appears to be sporting a metal or at least a metallic-looking rear shell, so we might see Samsung finally respond to consumer feedback at last. 

In terms of hardware, the Galaxy F is expected to keep the S5's novel heart-rate monitor, along with its 16-megapixel ISOCELL camera. New on the list is an upgraded Snapdragon 805 processor and probably some extra RAM. The Galaxy F is also expected to make use of a 5.3-inch, Quad HD resolution (1440 x 2560 pixels) display. If we were to venture a guess, the Galaxy F, if real, is a few months away from reality. 


source: evleaks

93 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 02 Jul 2014, 07:05 10

1. iMemo (Posts: 110; Member since: 22 Feb 2014)


Okay... That looks cute!

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 08:19 1

32. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)


Speaker design on back could give it much better look.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 22:08

88. steedsofwar (unregistered)


The front looks very attractive. The back looks ugly. Why 5.3"?

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 08:31 4

35. aayupanday (Posts: 577; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


Now that's how you imitate LG...

posted on 03 Jul 2014, 04:58

92. shuaibhere (Posts: 1986; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)


More like LG imitating Samsung S series with G series....

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 08:56 8

38. Lampriya (banned) (Posts: 245; Member since: 05 Oct 2013)


cute? Yeah only in samsung fans mind. everything about samsung is cute and innovative. I'm speechless

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 09:12 17

44. ArtSim98 (Posts: 3535; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


Isn't it the same for Apple fanboys? Like you as a perfect example.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 09:14 14

46. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Funny because you do the exact same thing. Pot, meet kettle.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 10:04 7

59. BobbyDigital (Posts: 2034; Member since: 29 May 2014)


As do you Smurf. Let's be honest here, you're one of PA's biggest trolls. You troll almost every non Samsung related article and go on and on about how great Samsung is. You're just as bad as Mxy and the nokia/MS fanboys.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 13:14

69. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Prove it. Give me five articles in the past week.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 13:29 3

70. BobbyDigital (Posts: 2034; Member since: 29 May 2014)


So now you're a liar on top of being a troll?? Wow. And I don't have to prove anything that's already common knowledge in these forums.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 17:03

79. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Didn't think so. I win.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 20:00 3

83. BobbyDigital (Posts: 2034; Member since: 29 May 2014)


Seriously dude? Just because you haven't trolled yet this week, doesn't mean you don't troll. Ask anyone in these forums if you're a Samsung gambit who trolls anything not Samsung and I guarantee they'll say yes. But hey, if you can't be honest with yourself more power to you junior.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 20:08 3

85. Run.n.Gun (Posts: 45; Member since: 06 Nov 2013)


lol..PapSmur stands on the frontline when it comes to defending Samsung and that is indeed common knowledge

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 22:14

90. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Please feel free to direct yourself into reading comment #2.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 22:13

89. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Comment #2.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 09:32 5

52. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)


Just log out.. you're even worse than zyx(can't remember the darn name) atleast he's a bit logical.. all you do i praise without any facts to back you up.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 09:53 4

54. doejon (Posts: 398; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


at least they are trying to change something unlike apple

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 17:20

80. Htconem7 (Posts: 7; Member since: 02 Jun 2014)


I wonder if HTC and Samsung will release their respective "prime" products to counter the release of Iphone 6. Very interesting.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 18:53 4

82. marcski07 (Posts: 598; Member since: 25 Apr 2014)


CEO: designers! let's redefine our design! let's make a galaxy F, as in F for Fashion! an elegant, seamless, beautiful, handset!
designers: how about simply change our perforated design to brushed metal in the back and keep the perforated design in the front? that will surely perfect for FASHION, and our fans will surely gonna love the NEW design.
CEO: hmm... that's good idea! that's really a MAJOR change! you guys are genius!

galaxy F * c k T * r d s

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 07:05 14

2. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


No thanks. If history repeats itself (M8), aluminum = inferior reception.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 07:10 2

6. maccess (Posts: 742; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)


True.. My m7 reception isnt as good as my note 2.. But this looks quite tempting though..

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 08:16 3

31. amats69 (Posts: 1466; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)


Seriously? You have the HTC one m7? The phone u bash to death before? Dude pretending that you have that phone just for the sake of bashing,trolling or posting some lies is just BS..lol..right Papa smurf?

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 09:11 3

43. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Don't know if you're trying to say I have a M8 or not.

M8's reception sucks. Period.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 14:49

72. maccess (Posts: 742; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)


I have an m7 as my daily driver even until now.. I like the phone just for the speaker and the smoothness of sense UI.. Everything else like the camera, the easily dent edge, easily hot back when you browsing or playing games and the not so great reception are the downside for me.. And please give me any link that i ever bash the m7 to death kid.. And one more, did i ever mention that i dont own an m7??

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 07:12 5

9. Supraman21 (Posts: 325; Member since: 09 Jun 2010)


http://www.anandtech.com/show/7984/discussion-on-material-choices-in-mobile
There is no history of bad reception from the HTC One. Neither the M7 or M8

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 07:14 5

12. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)


There is buddy.
And I used to have M7. So saying that from experience.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 07:25 7

16. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Use the device in person. I always get three or four signal bars everywhere in Chicago where my S5 always got five. The noticeable difference is the Wifi radios that give me 50% slower speeds. S5 gave me 108mbps and M8 gave me 50. God they blow so much.

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 09:03

41. Noble_One (Posts: 60; Member since: 18 Aug 2012)


I believe this is true...I've never had the m7 or m8 but my evo 4g LTE definitely had reception issues when compared to the one x. The aluminum novelty wore off real quick for me personally...

posted on 02 Jul 2014, 12:52

68. chebner (Posts: 235; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


I don't think comparing an Evo 4g LTE to a One X is really valid when it comes to reception. Yes they are the essentially the same phone constructed with different materials but they also run on different networks. The EVO was exclusive to Sprint, other carriers had the ONE X. Your reception issue may have been related to the Sprint network and not your aluminum phone.

I too had the EVO 4g LTE. While it wasn't the best phone I've ever had in terms of reception, it was miles ahead of the EVO 3D, which was plastic.

The M8 is another step up from the EVO 4g LTE for reception. I've had one dropped call in 3 months and data connections are much more consistent and speedier. It helps that Sprint has vastly improved their network where I live.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories