Certain evidence in Apple-Samsung case was skewed toward Apple

7. Stuntman posted on 09 Oct 2012, 02:07 34 1

Exactly. I walked into a Samsung store and bought the SGS3 because I thought it was an iPhone. :)

8. Doakie posted on 09 Oct 2012, 02:16 24 0

Wait so you're telling me that my Galaxy S 3 wasn't made by Apple? I'm going to sue this Samsung who made such a great knockoff.

15. whysoserious posted on 09 Oct 2012, 03:11 24 0

Wait, what?! That phone with a bigger AMOLED screen with a Samsung logo in front is not an iPhone?!? Damn you Samsung!

• This comment is posted in response to #8 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #8 Hide

28. PhenomFaz posted on 09 Oct 2012, 07:50 11 0

Yeah Samsung made a knock-off that actually performs better than the original iPhone!
How dare they make it better, more functional and simply more awesome than the original!

Apple should sue Samsung for pure awesomeness :)

• This comment is posted in response to #8 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #8 Hide

52. anywherehome posted on 10 Oct 2012, 12:35 0 0

Ive bought one tiny and one big sh*t thought it was an iPhone and an iPad...

• This comment is posted in response to #8 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #8 Hide

13. Droid_X_Doug posted on 09 Oct 2012, 03:01 1 0

Yup-per. Didn't Sammy negotiate the rights to build (and sell) versions of the iPhone with screen sizes larger than 4 inches? It was all part of the deal where Sammy agreed to supply Apple with the chipset for the iToys.

17. Sprissy posted on 09 Oct 2012, 04:38 0 10

Really????? Are you blind....GS3 has Samsung right on top the screen....hello that's a pretty good sign that it's not an iPhone.

31. parkwaydr posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:23 14 0

Sarcasm is a foreign language to you isn't it?

• This comment is posted in response to #17 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #17 Hide

19. angelesmec posted on 09 Oct 2012, 04:38 7 0

I can understand that an average consumer might think that an iPhone was mistaken for a Samsung phone although they are very different in most design cues but seeing the Samsung logo and still thinking that it was an iPhone and purchasing it was really a foolish

20. angelesmec posted on 09 Oct 2012, 04:39 1 0

I can understand that an average consumer might think that an iPhone was mistaken for a Samsung phone although they are very different in most design cues but seeing the Samsung logo and still thinking that it was an iPhone and purchasing it was really a foolish act. common sense people.. sorry for the term used.

23. TheLibertine posted on 09 Oct 2012, 06:06 28 1

I buyed a Samsung TV thinking it was an iPhone...

36. ZEUS.the.thunder.god posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:51 10 0

You must be thinking its the new 55" iPOD XXXXXL lol:)

• This comment is posted in response to #23 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #23 Hide

38. d3nster posted on 09 Oct 2012, 09:48 4 0

bahahahahaha!!

• This comment is posted in response to #36 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #36 Hide

29. ZEUS.the.thunder.god posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:07 5 0

what the hell.. I have always been using my phone thinking its an iNexus designed in california:)

12. Bluesky02 posted on 09 Oct 2012, 02:54 3 0

Agreed

18. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 09 Oct 2012, 04:38 9 0

The jury is biased so they didn't care much about the facts anyway.

22. doejon posted on 09 Oct 2012, 05:26 9 0

whaaaaaaaaaaaat i thought my device with my msdcard and removable battery is an iphone - damn i got punkd´

51. anywherehome posted on 10 Oct 2012, 12:34 0 0

.......

14. zibbyzib2000 posted on 09 Oct 2012, 03:03 9 0

Agreed :l

10. Doakie posted on 09 Oct 2012, 02:24 9 0

Funny. I was thinking the exact same thing. Samsung should have spent $250 million on lawyers...

26. protozeloz posted on 09 Oct 2012, 07:29 4 0

actually if no mistaken they were not allowed to do so either to call on an extra witness or show other devices and proof

30. remixfa posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:12 7 0

they werent allowed to call on Shin or present certain very obvious pieces of evidence, but when this quote was read to the jury, samsung's lawyers should have still stood up and called BS. They had the trial stacked against them unfairly, but they also made some pretty big bonehead mistakes for a law firm representing such a big client.

32. parkwaydr posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:29 4 0

I agree Remix, I also feel koh should not have been allowed to oversee this case because of her ties to the firm that represented Apple.

• This comment is posted in response to #30 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #30 Hide

34. networkdood posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:49 3 0

park hit the nail on the head...OWWW!!
Yeah, having a judge oversee this trial - one that has ties to APPLE - that in itself is grounds for a re-trial. What is wrong with our system of justice for overlooking something so obvious such as this?

• This comment is posted in response to #32 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #32 Hide

37. parkwaydr posted on 09 Oct 2012, 09:08 3 0

The problem is that we as country have become disgustingly greedy, money outweighs everything, even justice. While I don't want to sound like a conspiracy freak, I wouldn't be surprised if Apple handed out some checks along the way in this one. The sad truth is that our once great nation is so corrupt even our candidates for office are both crooks.

• This comment is posted in response to #34 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #34 Hide

39. ZEUS.the.thunder.god posted on 09 Oct 2012, 10:58 2 0

I am from India and feel the same way. but we as consumers can bring the change. thats why I hate apple from my heart and soul.

• This comment is posted in response to #37 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #37 Hide

43. remixfa posted on 09 Oct 2012, 15:53 2 0

lol.
When HAVENT they been crooks? :)

• This comment is posted in response to #37 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #37 Hide

44. parkwaydr posted on 09 Oct 2012, 16:25 1 0

good point. lol

• This comment is posted in response to #43 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #43 Hide

11. plgladio posted on 09 Oct 2012, 02:33 6 0

Hehe good one..

27. someones4 posted on 09 Oct 2012, 07:35 5 0

same as how steve jobs quote Pablo Picasso. Can't create his own tagline

35. networkdood posted on 09 Oct 2012, 08:49 2 0

true, lol

46. VZWuser76 posted on 09 Oct 2012, 17:04 0 0

I said the same thing when the trial was happening. They basically say that people are to stupid to tell the difference between an iphone and anything else. Yet at the same time they want those stupid people to buy their product. I can understand if you only got a second or two to look at it to not be able to tell the difference, I've done that myself with devices used on TV or in movies. But when you go to buy a device, especially one that comes with a 2 year contract, that you don't just pick up the first things that looks remotely like what you want. The first time they power it up they'll see the Samsung logo instead of Apple's. And it's not like your stuck with it if you bought the wrong one. You've got 14 to 30 days to return it (depending on carrier).

If Apple really believes all these potential customers are that stupid, then maybe those stupid people shouldn't have a smartphone.

42. AppleHateBoy posted on 09 Oct 2012, 15:07 0 0

Well said!