Camera samples of the Sony Xperia Z vs 808 PureView vs iPhone 5 vs Note II appear (macro, low light)

5. Nathan_ingx posted on 31 Jan 2013, 03:43 24 2

Here's how i would conclude it:
1. 808
2. Xperia Z
3. iPhone 5
4. Xperia T
5. Note II.
Although i'm l'le confused with the iPhone and T, i chose the iPhone because the T was darker than usual and lacked more detail than the iPhone.
Disappointed with Note II's lack of detail as i thought it would be better than T.

14. hung2900 posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:30 5 0

A little bit annoying that with NoteII or Galaxy S3 we have to turn the low-light shooting on in every indoor situation. Most of comparisons skipped it (they thought it's not fair for others?)

23. Nathan_ingx posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:38 0 0

I don't think it has problems with shooting where the lights are dim. What the image lacked was detail...it looked slightly muddy compared to the rest...a certain sharpness missing.

• This comment is posted in response to #14 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #14 Hide

21. kobainez posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:01 10 0

We hv to remember that this xperia z is still in prototpe stage. The retail version will be better than this

37. emadshiny posted on 31 Jan 2013, 08:28 8 1

come on. T is much better than note. i think note 2 is the worst.

39. kclgphilsbsa posted on 31 Jan 2013, 08:59 1 4

not really.. go to gsmarena.com use their photo compare tool, use galaxy s3 or note 2 den compare it with other sony's phone esp the xperia T, ull see that no sony's phone beats the note2 and s3..
also the videos taken by galaxies are better..

in low light condition>i dont know..

20. cezarepc posted on 31 Jan 2013, 05:39 0 0

My Nokia N8 can't do super-close macros (like the ones shown from the droids and iPhone5). I guess they implemented the same thing on the 808.

29. -RVM- posted on 31 Jan 2013, 07:08 5 0

808 can't do as close macro shots because different optics (field of view ?) or something like that. However, you can use lossless zoom feature to get closer than other smartphones.

43. CanYouSeeTheLight posted on 31 Jan 2013, 18:24 0 0

I agree, compared to the phones in the Xperia's class it is indeed the best, it improved on the Xperia T in term of fine details, noise and contrast! The contrast is what improved the most! Great job Sony!

6. proto posted on 31 Jan 2013, 03:49 0 6

Xperia Z camera making realy good picturesIbetter then iphone5), but cameraphone of 2013? I don't think so. S series and iPhone had best cameraphones last 2 years, so I expect they' will beat xperia z .. we only have to wait..

35. kobainez posted on 31 Jan 2013, 08:09 4 0

This is not the same SONY. This year is SONY only. Last year was SONY+Ericsson

38. kclgphilsbsa posted on 31 Jan 2013, 08:56 1 0

last year is Sony's start ryt?

• This comment is posted in response to #35 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #35 Hide

15. XperiaUser posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:30 5 0

i m just starts thinking about next flagship from Sony with more better camera beast lolz......

17. SIGPRO posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:55 2 8

I don't think so, remember Nokia is coming with new Pureview phones. Even the old 808 beats the Xperia Z.

33. zuckerboy posted on 31 Jan 2013, 07:47 3 1

yes 41 mp lumia with 2kg weight and 60mm thickness lol

48. jiezel91 posted on 02 Feb 2013, 12:04 0 0

not so smart of a joke you got there

• This comment is posted in response to #33 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #33 Hide

9. wendygarett (limited) 6 days ago posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:10 3 16

Because the camera guy (sony fan) is afraid to lose hehehe

18. rgxVOiD posted on 31 Jan 2013, 05:08 9 0

From all the things you usually say, this is the worst

32. BLikens1619 posted on 31 Jan 2013, 07:45 1 0

Lest you forget, the iPhone 5 is sporting a Sony lens.

10. Nathan_ingx posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:12 19 2

Kaliil...here's some tip.
1. Open the article.
2. Read the article.
3. Understand the article, and
4. Comment.

11. alterecho posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:19 4 1

Well, its older and more powerful brother, the 808, is present.

13. XperiaUser posted on 31 Jan 2013, 04:24 1 0

i also want to see comparison btw Xperia Z and lumia 920 , but its too early to say Camera king to lumia , actually too early ;)

22. zuckerboy posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:10 2 3

that is camera test between phones not bricks

24. Nathan_ingx posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:40 2 1

Atleast the 'brick' work wonders...unlike your brain which is underclocked.

25. zuckerboy posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:43 1 1

atleast i have brain ...

• This comment is posted in response to #24 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #24 Hide

27. Nathan_ingx posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:53 2 1

There you go...you just compared yourself to the 'brick' you were describing. Congratulations on getting new heights.

• This comment is posted in response to #25 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #25 Hide

28. LumiaLover posted on 31 Jan 2013, 06:59 1 1

Really?

• This comment is posted in response to #25 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #25 Hide

34. zuckerboy posted on 31 Jan 2013, 07:49 1 1

lol lumia lover ^^

• This comment is posted in response to #28 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #28 Hide

19. Emily1985 posted on 31 Jan 2013, 05:26 0 3

No, BB10z won this part(If you can lie, so I can too).

40. cripton805 posted on 31 Jan 2013, 11:20 2 1

I dont know how often you read the news here, but recently Nokia was releasing an update to help with the 920s blurry pictures.

I think it was a couple days ago.

Sooo.... Somebody is lying.

47. papss posted on 01 Feb 2013, 17:27 0 0

You once again fail to comprehend what I write.... LOW LIGHT.. Seriously it's not that hard to read and understand?

44. pyradark posted on 31 Jan 2013, 19:08 0 0

but not on sales!! hahahaha

45. legend1 posted on 01 Feb 2013, 07:28 0 0

not entirely true give nokia some time and you will see and this is a camera comparison not a sales comparison