x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe

0. phoneArena 10 Oct 2013, 10:32 posted on

benchmarking overall browser performance is a tricky affair. There's always the fear that one or all (in which case its fine) of the browsers you may want to test are going to game the benchmark one way or another....

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:01 5

13. ady_lad (Posts: 82; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)

Yeah, i used to love Opera. I had Opera on my phone since i had my Nokia 6630, i used it on every phone until i bought my HTC One. On this phone opera seems sluggish. Opera used to be better on the PC too, but now it's Firefox and IE10 for me.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:13

16. buccob (Posts: 2601; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)

Agree except for your final comment... IE10 in PC is really bad... I go with Chrome for a clean UI, what it sucks is that is such a RAM hog for Android... it even closes my music thats playing in the background

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:50 2

25. ady_lad (Posts: 82; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)

I think IE10 is a pretty good browser...there is no browser to be perfect, but i like Firefox for versatility, and i like IE10 too, i think it's a pretty solid browser to be fair.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 13:08 3

50. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)

Firefox > Chrome > every other browser > Internet Explorer.

I used to use Chrome but Firefox has received tons of updates since then and is faster.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 14:21 4

58. user996 (Posts: 218; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)

poor guy your back in 2000? with IE5,6 or what? IE10 and 11 rules. chrome is mess up time to time. becomes unresponsive and not responding but at that time IE10 or 11 flies through web pages

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 17:39

68. ady_lad (Posts: 82; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)

I woukdn't be so harsh on him, but i did have some bad experiences with Chrome, for me it proved it wasn't an alternative.

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 02:10

81. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Same here, chrome is crap, plus the privacy concerns one must have when using any Scroogle product...

posted on 16 Nov 2013, 16:34

99. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)

IE == Adware friendly!
FF is developer's paradise.

posted on 08 Mar 2014, 19:40

104. durnyank (Posts: 1; Member since: 15 Apr 2013)

I use a Mac, and Safari has come a very long way in the past couple of years. I USED to use Firefox and occasionally Chrome (NEVER IE), but now Safari out performs all of the other big name browsers that are compatible with Mac.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:59 2

11. ady_lad (Posts: 82; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)

I use Firefox mostly, it's faster and has more features than Chrome, but guess waht...i just downloaded puffin and it actually feels a lot faster than any other two...

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 16:32

66. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1237; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)

Agreed. Firefox is the smoothest which is the most important aspect to me.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:02

14. Shrihari (Posts: 97; Member since: 29 Jan 2013)

opera mini...using since five years...

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:10 2

15. maherk (Posts: 4205; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)

I am stuck with dolphin mainly because of the bookmarks, I just love it when I swipe right to get to my bookmarks. And also setting up the volume keys to switch tabs. I don't know if there is any browser that has those features

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:19

19. buccob (Posts: 2601; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)

I tried Dolphin in the past, but I did not love it... so I stayed with Opera at the time... mainly because Opera was usable with an external Keyboard (using the arrows to control a virtual mouse)... but the latest update that dissed the Classic mode they took that feature out, which I used it a lot when mirroring to TV and using mouse and keyboard (turning my phone into a "pc")

So I started using Chrome more and more, but kept Opera for low bandwith usage and low memory, though Puffin is taking that place alongside with Small Web Browsers for Sony's Small Apps


posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:14

17. Evil_SaNz (Posts: 259; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)

Puffin has scroll lag until it fully loads the page...chrome is fast but still has some hiccups under page load and scroll is too sensitive, causes some kind of "vertigo". Same for Firefox, while loading Phonearena site can't view immediately the page, artifacts and low res text.

Opera overheats the phone and has some bugs with some kind of pages.

My vote goes to Dolphin, always smooth even under pressure. Who cares if it's 1-2 sec slower: at least I can read immediately the sites with a smoothness feel

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:18 1

18. PootisMan (Posts: 255; Member since: 02 Aug 2013)

Sorry, but Dolphin so far is the best browser on my Nexus 4. Really love the features.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:25

20. ScruffyNerfHerder (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

Doesn't the latest Chrome have Puffin like features that can be enabled? Same with the Kindle Fire Silk browser?

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:50

26. ScruffyNerfHerder (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

Just to answer myself after some Googling, yes, Chrome (as of version 29) as well as Firefox, Opera, Silk and other browsers all support various implementations of SPDY which is a protocol for letting the certain web handling be done by a cloud server (in the case of Chrome, Google's servers) to reduce processing and page load times on the client browser. But in Chrome, it isn't enabled by default.

I'm not sure if Puffin uses SPDY and/or something else but it seems like this set of tests performed by this article needs to be re-ran with SPDY enabled for all the tested browsers for an accurate comparison of "server assisted" browsing benchmarks such as Puffin is doing.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:27 1

21. boosook (Posts: 1441; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)

The problem with Chrome is its high CPU usage... but unfortunately CPU usage has not been taken into account in these tests. Just open some tabs and you'll notice that Chrome keeps on using the CPU even when all the pages have been loaded. What's more, if you exit with the Home buttone (i.e. you leave the tabs open with chrome in the background) it still uses the same cpu amount! You can really drain your batteries this way.
This does not happen with Dolphin: once you've loaded the page, the CPU is idle again.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:37 2

22. Kitkat_4.4 (Posts: 74; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)

Wonder how much $$$ PA took from Puffin devs for doing this. Just checked Puffin on my Nexus 4. Woah, this things lags, haven't seen this much lag on even opera mini or similar browsers lol. Though after reading this, gave a try to firefox and it was quite good. Though I will stick to chrome. Just one flaw I found in firefox was that when loading up phonearena.com, it kept take my data when I even clicked on "X" to stop loading the page and just show me whatever is loaded till then, but still it was taking data. sad. chrome ftmfw.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:41

23. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)

It has scroll lag but the load times and benchmarks destroy 3 other browsers I tested: Firefox, Stock Browser and Chrome. Also the built in gamepad and flash player support are good if you like flash games. Its still a low slower than firefox on my i5 4670k @4.5ghz with a ramdisk caching the internet and its on a 500GB 840 Evo SSD which loads everything instantly.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:43 6

24. Chris.P (Posts: 566; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)

Not a dime, unfortunately ;(

And precisely what is it that we're 'doing'? If you have it downloaded then go ahead and put it through the same tests and you're bound to arrive at the same results. No lie! :)

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:03

30. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)

Challenge accepted

Tested on my worst android backup phone (LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile version) I killed all apps possible before running this.

Sunspider: 217ms
Kraken: 2278.1ms
Browsermark: 3642
Peacekeeper: 2986 (only one that appears to be hardware reliant, nexus 4 was a little higher than yours)

The other 3 score differences between the L9 and my Nexus 4 isn't that much but the nexus 4 does run the browser much smoother.

As said above load times are way better than the other 3 still, nexus 4 loads significantly faster than the L9, better than your scores show.

Speedtest for my home internet: 12ms Ping, 12.6mbps download 1.5 upload.

Tmobile LTE Test: 55ms ping, 38mbps download, 22 upload.

Tested on both load times were slightly better on my home since less latency.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:16

34. ScruffyNerfHerder (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

Shatter and Chris P., from my brief reading about SPDY (mentioned above in my comment), bandwidth saving features (which may affect page load times) are enabled by default on at least some browsers (like Chrome) when connected over a wireless data service connection but disabled by default over a wifi connect. Anyway, one possible explanation why 4G and wifi testing could give different results.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:19

35. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)

I can attest to this one: not a dang-on penny.
I use Puffin and it really blazes compared to the other browsers - all of which I've used except UC.
This, amazingly, is an objective and professional article - kudos to the author. However - I would like to see a Puffin vs Safari comparison.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:38

39. Kitkat_4.4 (Posts: 74; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)

Then I guess benchmarks doesn't prove a thing. Real Experience says it lags even worse than opera mini on Symbian. Scroll , zooming the page, user interface... lags alot! Though firefox is really nice. Sadly puffin was on my phone for mere 10 mins and was installed.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 16:04

65. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)

You should add test notes such as the device used and your WiFi speed.

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 01:15

77. Chris.P (Posts: 566; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)

It was one possibility, but since the post got so long I decided not to burden it with stuff that aren't essential/go without saying.

Tests were performed on the PA Wi-Fi. I specifically ran SpeedTest like 10 times before I started, since I only got 2 lines of coverage in the studio and wanted to make sure I wasn't just having an exercise in futility.

DL was minimum 15 Mbit, all the way up to 35Mbit, UP was up to 20 or so.

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 01:17 3

78. Chris.P (Posts: 566; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)

Am I missing something, or is there actually Safari for Android?

posted on 23 Mar 2014, 01:16

105. shioupyn (Posts: 1; Member since: 23 Mar 2014)

I am Shioupyn Shen, CEO of CloudMosa, maker of the Puffin Web Browser. I can attest the Chris. P and Phone Arena did not receive any payment from CloudMosa. In fact, I do not know Chris P. at all. By the way, it is a pleasure to meet you.

CloudMosa is a self-funded and self-booting company. All revenue is spent on product development and data center expansion. I truly believe word-of-mouth marketing that a good product can sell itself through user referrals.

Here are my responses to some other questions. (1) Puffin has iOS version. Please evaluate Puffin against other browsers on iOS, too. (2) Puffin can save network usage by more than 50%. Please benchmark on network usage to see how Puffin can save users money. (3) Puffin works even better on tablets. Puffin on tablets is truly a laptop replacement. It would be great if you can evaluate Puffin against other tablet browsers on both iOS and Android.

Here is a million dollar question -- how can Puffin be possible? What is Puffin's secret recipe?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories