x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Boxed HTC One (2014) unit hits eBay, is quickly sold for $499.99

0. phoneArena 12 Mar 2014, 10:21 posted on

As we guessed earlier today, we are back with yet another HTC One (M8)-related leak before the day is even out. This time around, some sneaky person has apparently, somehow, managed to get his hands on a Verizon-branded, fully-boxed HTC M8 and has already managed to sell it on eBay after a short bidding exchange that saw the price shoot up from the initial asking price of $199 all the way up to $499.99...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:22 15

1. ankiipankii (Posts: 35; Member since: 21 Jun 2013)


lol WTF ..how can this be possible

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:25 6

23. akki20892 (Posts: 3621; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


Same question is that a good marketing?

500$ not too bad. HTC how this can be possible before announcement. Oh God why.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 12:33 6

34. amro99 (Posts: 77; Member since: 29 Nov 2012)


Smart marketing or whatever it is called, its getting so much on my nerve! I think I will stop visiting these tech sites until 25th :(

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 17:30 2

61. Muzhhur (Posts: 248; Member since: 14 Sep 2012)


Yes indeed ! smarth one who make it happend and lucky one who take that price!

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 14:17

42. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6684; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


It's probably a fake with a blank mirror

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 22:29 1

77. AiAiRon (Posts: 10; Member since: 12 Mar 2014)


Does everyone really think that these prices are just coincidences?? There is no way that the auction just happened to end at $499.99 to the penny. HTC are refreshing their flagship phone to be more affordable. I guarantee that the non-contract retail price on this phone will be the exact same as what this phone was sold for on ebay!

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:23 10

2. LiyanaBG (Posts: 366; Member since: 07 Nov 2013)


this confirms GSM Arena liers they said only 16GB internal memory. same for the camera all they said was lies

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:38 3

9. LiyanaBG (Posts: 366; Member since: 07 Nov 2013)


i can't wait to see how big is the battery now that GSM Arena give out false information this brings hope back.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:04 4

15. TechFreak123 (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 Feb 2014)


This box only means there is a 32GB version, but there might be a 16GB version as well.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 17:56

63. giani (Posts: 269; Member since: 13 Nov 2012)


I Dont really care about the camera but if the battery is indeed 2600 I won't be upgrading from my One 2013. To be honest that's why I would have hoped the role of the Fcking bezel is...make phone bigger put a decent battery in...
Guess wait for 25th then..

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:24 6

3. ArtSim98 (Posts: 3204; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


What?! A phone got sold before it's even announced? LOLOL

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 14:43 4

46. Shatter (Posts: 2031; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Sounds to me like a Verizon employee stole it and sold.it for some easy cash.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:25 4

4. Calm_down_mon (Posts: 35; Member since: 12 Dec 2013)


This is getting out of hand >.> if this in not some clever plan from htc's marketing deparment that I simply do not understand , htc should get it's sh*t together.

Nice price thou.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:27 1

5. LiyanaBG (Posts: 366; Member since: 07 Nov 2013)


if it was HTC plan they would not sale it for $499. 99 they would drive the price very high on eBay.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:06

16. pwnarena (Posts: 960; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)


they bought it themselves. come on.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:10

17. LiyanaBG (Posts: 366; Member since: 07 Nov 2013)


true that can happen but they would drive the price higher and buy it just like apple did drive the price up to $10000 last year. $499. 99 price just doesn't scream HTC plan

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:17 1

19. AiAiRon (Posts: 10; Member since: 12 Mar 2014)


I really do think that this was a marketing move on HTC. I believe what they are saying is that the phone will go for $199 on two-year contract and $499 without contract.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 13:19 1

37. xche78x (Posts: 101; Member since: 11 Mar 2014)


Negative publicty is still publicity and can be turned to positive. This is htc leaking their own product and even buying it too. Bad marketing strategy that may surprise and have rare outcome. Still wont buy htc though, id rather buy an asus zenphone 6...

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 20:40

73. lsutigers (Posts: 761; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)


No way this was HTC. This is a Verizon employee who will be jobless as soon as ebay gives up his/her info when HTC presses them for it. This is ILLEGAL. This phone has NOT been released yet.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:30 5

6. newbey123 (Posts: 449; Member since: 19 Mar 2012)


I want this phone and I want it now! Looking to be the hottest phone on the market.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:28 6

25. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8839; Member since: 14 May 2012)


I'm starting to really like this phone as well... Decisions decisions.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:36 3

7. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3596; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


This is getting awful

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:38

8. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3596; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Anyway nexus 6 will break its records

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:38 2

10. KingDingaLing (Posts: 324; Member since: 11 Oct 2013)


If this is an actual HTC phone, I would think it would sell for a lot more than that. I just sold an iPhone 4S 64GB for $300 on ebay. Odd, to say the least.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:39

11. UglyFrank (Posts: 550; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)


Why would they use DDR2 ram when they have used DDR3 ram before?

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:03

14. TechFreak123 (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 Feb 2014)


They didn't, the HTC One is also DDR2.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:34

28. UglyFrank (Posts: 550; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)


that is strange, I thought they had used DDR3 in the One X+, there is no disadvantage to using better ram besides cost.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 14:44

47. Shatter (Posts: 2031; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Ddr3 improves the battery life which was the main plus.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 16:23

52. UglyFrank (Posts: 550; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)


I know that

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:53

12. AiAiRon (Posts: 10; Member since: 12 Mar 2014)


I really do think that this was a marketing move on HTC. I believe what they are saying is that the phone will go for $199 on two-year contract and $499 without contract.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 10:54

13. bigv6691 (Posts: 10; Member since: 08 Jan 2014)


How is this phone leaked so bad? Is HTCs security just this terribe?

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:20

20. amats69 (Posts: 1125; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)


No..this is intentional...htc's marketing strategy

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 13:03

35. geordie8t1 (unregistered)


yeah i also believe it was a marketing ploy, as with all the "leaks", it was no secret that the original One was a failure in terms of marketing, everyone knew samsung and apple but not so many people knew about the HTC One, and from the very first announcement it was plagued by lack of marketing, lack of components, patent issues, low quality camera, no micro sd slot big phone for size compared to S4, all of these issues appear to be addressed, leaks equal marketing equals interest, i expect this phone to do substantially better then its predecessor simply because of the above issues addressed :-)

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 13:27 3

38. HTCOE (Posts: 512; Member since: 20 Nov 2011)


this is not a marketing ploy just a handful of irresponsible employees and partners who've had access to the device early because the phone will be available right after the announcement

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:27

24. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Main reasoning is that there might be real penalties if you break Samsung and Apple NDAs. They can give you very little stock or even sue you. With HTC, these companies don't care if they get minimal HTC stock and they are already giving so much money to Sony, Samsung, Nokia, and Apple that they can't afford to pay the legal fees to sue you. Haha

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 17:33 1

62. true1984 (Posts: 593; Member since: 23 May 2012)


dude, you are so f****** lame.....

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:16 1

18. HASHTAG (Posts: 179; Member since: 31 Jan 2014)


Lucky buyer.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:22

21. Kishin (Posts: 634; Member since: 30 May 2013)


That price wow...

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 11:23 6

22. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Lol still using the left over DDR2 ram they had from the low HTC One demand. Oh HTC, you just surprise me with your crappiness more and more each day.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 13:05 8

36. 7Superman9 (Posts: 76; Member since: 17 Sep 2013)


Other than benchmarks, the end user will not see a difference in the DDR2 and DDR3.
Second, considering how clean sense is compared to touchwiz, u really do see anyone noticing.
If you go by the leaked benchmarks for both the S5 and the All new One, the One is faster.
Which makes that a none argument.
Continue to troll though, we all need something to laugh at.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 14:39

45. limporgyuk (Posts: 152; Member since: 06 Nov 2013)


Well said, there are some drongo's around, hopefully he's learnt the error of his ways

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 14:46 3

48. Shatter (Posts: 2031; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Hey HTCtard he didn't say anything about Samsung.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 14:54 3

49. limporgyuk (Posts: 152; Member since: 06 Nov 2013)


No but Samsung uses DDR3, he was using it as an example fool

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 17:12

59. 7Superman9 (Posts: 76; Member since: 17 Sep 2013)


Continue trolling fool. The remark was made as a point but it suited my needs seeing as how I was referring to a troll to begin with.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 16:36 3

54. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Hey if you want a company to rip you off then by all means. If you charge DDR3 prices then you should include regardless of how undemanding or non versatile your software is.

If you are charging flagship prices, then I expect flagship performance AND parts. The last thing we need is another Apple overpricing things just because some loser on phonearena thinks that the end user won't notice.

If you put after market parts in my new car I won't notice but that doesn't make it right or acceptable....

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 17:15 1

60. 7Superman9 (Posts: 76; Member since: 17 Sep 2013)


Same could be said about most manufactures build components. If it increases battery life, then that's what Samsung needs. Seeing as how even with a larger battery and DDR3, the Ones battery lasted longer.
Weak argument, try again.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 19:12

67. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Nothing weak about my argument. If you want crap parts in your phone and the only thing that matters to you is stock software, then by all means.

I want better parts so my custom ROMs can run better than they would on the HTC One.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 21:07 1

75. techaman (unregistered)


Hey stupid what do u think Samsung just did with the gs5 2gig ram and no 64bit if u want to troll go on there page

posted on 13 Mar 2014, 02:16

82. limporgyuk (Posts: 152; Member since: 06 Nov 2013)


I would say a lot of the expense in the HTC One is from machining that aluminium plate for hours - let me tell you its definitely worth it. I think the RAM cost makes up a tiny amount of the BOM. Samsung products look and feel cheap - not what I want from a 'premium' phone.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 16:43 3

58. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


So are you saying Samsung has the right to strip the specs of the gpe of the GS5 because it is fast? Sure why not. Put ddr2 ram and a slower sd801 because the software is fast.... The end user won't notice right...

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 19:06

66. 7Superman9 (Posts: 76; Member since: 17 Sep 2013)


I'm sorry, did I miss something???
Htc didn't use DDR3. If they had, then your argument would be valid. So, if they had downgraded their components, you would be correct.
Thought I would say that two different ways, hopefully that helps you and the other trolls understand.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 19:15

68. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


My argument is valid because you said ddr2 ram was fine because of HTC software. So therefore, according to your retard logic, ddr2 ram would be fine for the gpe edition gs5 because of software.

So are you backtracking your argument to mean that ddr2 ram is fine as long as you never used ddr3 ram before? How is that more valid? That just sounds stupid like your logic.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 19:29 1

70. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1776; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


The S5 only has 2GB of RAM, where others this year are using 3GB, so are they putting out a crap product because others are using better specs? They were the first to come out with 3GB or RAM in a phone, why aren't they upping the RAM as others have done?

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 23:55

78. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Yes the GS5 was pretty disappointing all around but it is at least more reasonable than the crap HTC is putting out.

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 19:25

69. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1776; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


So you've said before you like Apple devices, and they have the highest profit margin of any manufacturer. How do you think they do that? Anyway you look at it, it means they're charging more over the device costs than anyone else. Now HTC doesn't have anywhere near the profit margins that Apple does, and they keep the costs down by using components that aren't bleeding edge, but still give good performance. What are the differences in performance we're talking about here? If we're talking milliseconds, is it really that big a deal? Even a second or two, is that going to ruin your whole day?

I'd prefer a company with a lower profit margin but with similar performance. It's the same as what Motorola has done. Their phones of last year were said to have specs form the previous year, yet in day to day use, they were in the top 5 in terms of performance. If they can do that with so called outdated specs, what are the others doing wrong?

Personally, I'd rather line a company's pockets less and and the same or near the same performance, rather than ensure that a company's higher ups make more money for essentially overcharging me. So are you ok with being overcharged as longs as they have the specs you want?

posted on 12 Mar 2014, 20:22

71. 7Superman9 (Posts: 76; Member since: 17 Sep 2013)


Couldn't have said it better myself.
Unfortunately you cannot reason with ignorant trolls, even if reviews and real world usage prove it. They keep wanting to talk specs and how horrible htc is. When their preferred manufacturer uses those higher specs and still ranks lower. If course, that's what a troll is.
Taters and shatter, keep trolling. At this rate only a fool would validate your view.

posted on 13 Mar 2014, 00:04

79. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Its about peace of mind that you have the top of the line internals. It will also ensure that any Google edition phone will be superior in performance to the HTC One gpe edition.

The second half of your paragraph makes no sense. You are not getting overcharged because you have great specs. All flagships cost relatively the same. So if you are going to be paying $649 for a phone, it better have ddr3 ram and not ddr2 ram just because your software is light.

The only way you are overcharged is if you buy HTC and their skimping on ram and battery. Apple is even worse. If their are companies willing to give you great performance and great specs, why would you buy great performance with crap specs?

posted on 13 Mar 2014, 00:28 1

80. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1776; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


No, apparently you didn't understand it. Profit margin is the amount of money they make after their overhead (materials, assembly labor, maybe r&d). Apple, who you apparently think is a good OEM has the highest profit margin of any mobile device manufacturer. That means if they had the same profit margin as other OEMS, their device would cost significantly less. Are you getting this so far? That means that they are charging more for what you getting vs other manufacturers. Does what I have explained make sense to you or not?

This is why I always smh when Apple fanboys cheer that Apple has the highest profit margin. It's like saying "Yay! I paid more than I needed to for what I got!" That's cheering that a company is making more profit off of it's customers than other companies. I'm not talking total sales or anything of the kind. The profit margin is the average money after expenses per device. The cost of better or worse components is out of the picture at that point, this is the money made after them, after assembly costs, etc, the free and clear money per device.

Now there are only a few ways to increase profit margin. Lesser grade components, pay less for assembly, pay less for advertising, or cut r&d costs. Which do you think they have cut for such a high margin?

posted on 13 Mar 2014, 02:53

84. Taters (Posts: 3524; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


You really are a dumb ass aren't you? Where did I say Apple was a good oem? Go read my replies again. Nowhere did I say Apple was a good oem. I DID say that if HTC charged based on performance alone and skimped on specs, THEN HTC would be just another Apple. Overcharging you based on non versatile light software that skimps on specs.

The only two companies severely overcharging hear are Apple and HTC. And no them having no profit margins is not an excuse to skimp on parts. In fact, that is exactly why they suck. Skimping on parts and quality control.

If you have to compete on value, lose some money to do it like Samsung, LG, and Sony does. You don't see LG skimping on ddr3 ram because of poor profit margins. HTC has no business doing it period.

posted on 13 Mar 2014, 09:52

88. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1776; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


I'm referring to the last time we argued, and you were saying how much had luck you've had with HTC, but that you've never had a problem with Samsung or Apple devices. So if you're using them as a contrast to HTC, you must think they're OK then correct?

You've had problems with HTC, I and my family have had problems with Samsung, as I said in the last article we posted on. The difference is I don't go around and say all Samsung devices are sh*t and I hope they go out of business. Because I understand that my experience isn't the same as everyone else's, something you can't seem to fathom.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories