BlackBerry privatization bid fails, Thorsten Heins out as CEO
0. phoneArena 04 Nov 2013, 08:02 posted on
About six weeks ago, the news came down that troubled Canadian company BlackBerry had agreed to a $4.7 billion deal from Fairfax Financial which would make the company private once again. The move would mean the company could work on rebuilding its lost market share outside of public scrutiny, but that deal never completely ended the rumors that BlackBerry was looking to sell the company, even in part...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Diego! (Posts: 474; Member since: 15 Jun 2009)
So, with Thorsten Heins out, they will create a new version of their OS? Oh no... not again! I hope they polish BB10 in order to get more people to get attracted to it.
Let's wait and see. On the other hand, bring ASAP BBMessenger to WP8! :D
4. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5279; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
As CNBC analyst (and successful investor) Jim Cramer observed: "This feels a lot like a desperation move."
10. Tommy1960i (Posts: 90; Member since: 11 Oct 2013)
May be they want to partner with google to introduce an BB OS wich will run android apps and games natively plus some more options. I dont think that BB10 or 11 or next one will succed because of the number and quality of the apps. Android or WP is their last chance.
2. E.S.1 (Posts: 286; Member since: 14 Sep 2013)
And they have to cut their prices in half so people start paying attention to their products.
3. WestFiasco (Posts: 12; Member since: 29 May 2013)
The price of the Z10 is what made me go to Android when it was time for an upgrade from my then current Blackberry. It just didn't seem worth the price they were asking when better was available for either less or a bit more.
6. residualhatred (Posts: 23; Member since: 28 May 2012)
I would have honestly brought the Q10 if it was priced cheaper. As a backup phone, it would be great to try. Blackberry was hoping all of its loyal customers who left would come back without hesitation. Now Im looking to a Nokia.
7. WestFiasco (Posts: 12; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Bad choices, we all make them. Some with lasting effects others not so much, time will truly tell just which side blackberry's choices truly reside on.
5. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5634; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
This idiot should of been gone when bb was failing.
8. slaggyb (Posts: 165; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
I hope the new interim CEO John Chen as the name sounds Korean don't end up using android on blackberry because he is sammy's brother. Now were is Allan F? He stopped reporting and gave this to Micheal H.
9. Doakie (Posts: 841; Member since: 06 May 2009)
Funny you say that. Because if Blackberry spent time making a heavy Blackberry skin atop Android instead of buying QNX and building their own OS then now being faced with the DAUNTING task of building their own Ecosystem they probably wouldn't be in the same horrible shape they are now. Plus they could have come to market way earlier than they did.
Let's say they decided to make a secure version of Android for the corporate sector kinda like how the govt has built their own secure version of Android. Even if they left Play Services behind like Amazon did to be able to ensure secure apps, they could have opened their own Blackberry Android Appstore and monetized off of that. Not to mention developers wouldn't have to start from scratch to develop for BlackBerry they'd just have to remove dependence upon the Play Services framework and submit their app for BlackBerry approval. The corporate and govt world would have been in their hands again, not to mention any qwerty loving Android fans. If the multitasking skin is what you like I'm sure they could have done that if they had thoroughly re skinned Android. Look at how differently the Kindle Fire works.
Honestly I think this method I've just mentioned would have been the Saving Grace for BlackBerry, Nokia Symbian and Palm/HP webOS. Each of those companies should have taken free to use AOSP and built a skin atop it that stuck with their own design parameters; that would have appeased their loyal customers who loved their UI and it would have made developing for their platform as easy as getting app approval. Plus money wise it would have been the cheapest route.
But then again I'm not a CEO. What do I know?
11. theuwilliam (Posts: 4; Member since: 10 Jun 2013)
I have to say, I really like your idea. I'm not sure if that would be feasible, but that would be a good route for Blackberry to move forward with. +1!
12. slaggyb (Posts: 165; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
The world doesn't revolve around android and not every OEM should go android reskinned or not. The world will be a boring place if the was no blackberry or windows OS. Not everybody wants android and am included. I have been using blackberry from the bold 9000 and have used all the high end bolds until recently the Q10. I have used all samsung flagship from the galaxy s2 to the note 2 which I still own and it's just collecting dust in my room. For me nothing beats blackberry I am a business guy always on the move and my blackberry has always done everything required of it.